Journals / Uluslararası Akademik Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 11

THE ROLE AND EFFECT OF HUMAN CAPITAL AND R&D ON THE SALES OF NEW PRODUCT: A STUDY ON THE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY OF KEIHANSHIN REGION IN JAPAN

BEŞERİ SERMAYE VE AR-GE’NİN YENİ ÜRÜNÜN SATIŞLARDAKİ PAYI ÜZERİNE ROLÜ VE ETKİSİ: JAPONYA KEİHANSHİN BÖLGESİNİN İMALAT SANAYİSİNİN İNOVASYON PERFORMANSI ÜZERİNE İNCELEME

Pages
1–18
Publication Date
2021-08-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has also been concluded that the most significant factors ensuring innovation within the companies are R&D and the experience of the companies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the updated version of the survey designed to examine the Finnish national innovation system has been applied to analyze the manufacturing industry in Osaka, Kyoto, Kobe and Sakai in the Keihanshin region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The innovation performance of Japan in 2018 has been evaluated by using the data obtained from the survey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has also been concluded that the most significant factors ensuring innovation within the companies are R&D and the experience of the companies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İnovasyon · Yeni Ürün Geliştirme · İmalat Sanayi

Abstract

In this study, the updated version of the survey designed to examine the Finnish national innovation system has been applied to analyze the manufacturing industry in Osaka, Kyoto, Kobe and Sakai in the Keihanshin region. The innovation performance of Japan in 2018 has been evaluated by using the data obtained from the survey. The study has examined the influence of innovation factors on company performance and searched the amount allocated to R&D expenditures and the effects of university graduates on the new product through modeling technique and directly referring to innovation (the percentage of the new product in sales). The data obtained as a result of the survey in the study; the factors affecting innovation performance were tabulated and interpreted on behalf of the region. The findings have indicated that big companies are more innovation-oriented. It has also been concluded that the most significant factors ensuring innovation within the companies are R&D and the experience of the companies. Moreover, it has been noticed that companies view know-how as a key in gaining an advantage in competition. After examining the innovation performance, Least Squares (Least Squares) regression analysis was used under the assumption of normality since the share of the new product in sales, which is used as an innovation production function output, is a continuous variable for the model established. Econometric findings show that human capital and R&D expenditures positively affect the share of new products in sales. The results of the econometric analysis show that the findings of the model are reliable.

Özet

Bu makalede, Finlandiya ulusal yenilik sisteminin tespitine yönelik düzenlenen anket formunu temel alınıp güncellenerek Keihanshin bölgesindeki Osaka, Kyoto, Kobe ve Sakai şehirlerinde imalat sektörü üzerine uygulanmıştır. Anketten elde edilen veriler kullanılarak, Japonya’da, 2018 yılı inovasyon performansı değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışma hem şirketlerin inovasyon faktörlerinin şirket performansına etkisini incelemekte hem de inovasyona doğrudan atıf yaparak (yeni ürünün satışlar içindeki yüzdesi) Ar-Ge harcamalarına ayrılan pay ile üniversite mezunlarının yeni ürün üzerindeki etkisini modelleyerek araştırmaktadır. Çalışmada inovasyon performansını etkileyen etmenler grafikleştirilmiş ve bölge adına yorumlanmıştır. Elde edilen bulguların büyük şirketlerin daha yenilikçi olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Şirketler için yeniliğin gerçekleşmesini sağlayan en önemli faktörlerin Ar-Ge ve firmaların tecrübesi olduğu anlaşılmıştır. Ayrıca firmalar, know-how’u rekabette avantaj sağlamada en önemli etmen olarak görmektedir. Çalışmada ayrıca inovasyon üretim fonksiyonu çıktısı olarak kullanılan satışlarda yeni ürünün payı değişkeni, sürekli bir değişken olduğu için normallik varsayımı altında En Küçük Kareler (EKK) regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Beşeri sermaye ve Ar-Ge masrafının satışlardaki yeni ürünün payına pozitif etkisi olduğu anlaşılmıştır. Yapılan ekonometrik analiz sonuçları modelin sonuçlarının anlamlı ve güvenilir olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

OGUZTURK, B. S., ÖZBAY, F., ARICAN, M., KALELİ, F. (2021). THE ROLE AND EFFECT OF HUMAN CAPITAL AND R&D ON THE SALES OF NEW PRODUCT: A STUDY ON THE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE OF THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY OF KEIHANSHIN REGION IN JAPAN. Uluslararası Akademik Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 11, 1–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/814422

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acs, J., & Audretsch, D. (1987). Innovation, market structure, and firm size. JSTOR, 69(4), 567–574. https://doi.org/doi:10.2307/1935950
  2. Acs, J., & Audretsch, D. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. JSTOR, 78(4), 678–690.
  3. Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., & And, M. F.-. (1994). R & D spillovers and recipient firm size. JSTOR, 76(2), 336–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109888
  4. Akın, Ö., & Reyhanoğlu, M. (2014). İşletme Büyüklükleri Bağlamında Türkiye’nin İnovasyon Portresi (2002-2008 Dönemi). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusbed.62064
  5. Almeida, F., Kennedy, A. J., Lin, B., & Nowak, I. V. (2019). Measuring innovation through a crowd source initiative. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(3), 471–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-04-2019-0046
  6. Audretsch, D. B., & Acs, Z. J. (1991). Innovation and Size at the Firm Level. Southern Economic Journal, 57(3), 739–744.
  7. Avermaete, T., Viaene, J., Morgan, E. J., & Crawford, N. (2003). Determinants of innovation in small food firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060310459163
  8. Batmaz, N., & Özcan, A. (2008). Yeniliği Etkileyen Unsurlar Ve Toplumsal Refah İlişkisi. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 1(1), 233–246. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/202045
  9. Bhattacharya, M., & Bloch, H. (2004). Determinants of Innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sbej.0000014453.94445.de
  10. Bouncken, R. B., Fredrich, V., Ritala, P., & Kraus, S. (2018). Coopetition in New Product Development Alliances: Advantages and Tensions for Incremental and Radical Innovation. British Journal of Management, 29(3), 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12213
  11. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard business school press. Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446467620.035
  12. Cooper, R. G. (2017). We’ve Come a Long Way Baby. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(3), 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12372
  13. Cooper, R. G. (2019). The drivers of success in new-product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 76(January), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.07.005
  14. Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of inno