Journals / Turkish Journal of Maritime and Marine Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Nutritional Composition of Protein Hydrolyzate Produced from Fish Waste

Balık atıklarından üretilen protein hidrolizatının besinsel kompozisyonu

Pages
27–39
Publication Date
2021-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, the properties of fish protein hydrolysates obtained according to different fish waste composition, enzyme concentration, temperature, time, and ph conditions were investigated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fish by-products are valuable resources with great potential for human consumption.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Proteases show the ability to produce low molecular weight peptides by a high rate of hydrolysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, the properties of fish protein hydrolysates obtained according to different fish waste composition, enzyme concentration, temperature, time, and ph conditions were investigated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Balık protein hidrolizatı · amino asit · besinsel kompozisyon

Abstract

Fish by-products are valuable resources with great potential for human consumption. Fish protein hydrolysates (FPH) are used as a functional food, animal feed, organic fertilizer, and pet food as commercial products, as well as in the medicine and pharmacology sector as they show antihypertensive, antithrombotic, anticancer, immunomodulatory, and antioxidant activities with the nutraceutical properties they contain. They can be an important source for obtaining high value-added products such as protein, amino acids, collagen, gelatin, and fat. It will contribute to the sustainability of aquaculture. The quality and functional properties of the product obtained by changing the waste, enzyme and production conditions used to differ. Proteases show the ability to produce low molecular weight peptides by a high rate of hydrolysis. The amino acid composition of fish protein hydrolysates is important due to its impact on nutritional value and functional properties. The protein quality of food and its capacity to meet the needs of organisms is determined by the essential amino acids that food has. Many researchers have reported that the amino acid content of fish protein hydrolysates varies according to the species of fish and the type of enzyme. In this article, the properties of fish protein hydrolysates obtained according to different fish waste composition, enzyme concentration, temperature, time, and ph conditions were investigated.

Özet

Balık yan ürünleri, insan tüketimi için büyük potansiyele sahip değerli kaynaklardır. Balık protein hidrolizatları (BPH) ticari ürün olarak fonksiyonel gıda, hayvansal yem, organik gübre ve evcil hayvan gıdası olarak kullanıldığı gibi BPH’ larının içerdikleri nutrasötik özellikteki biyoaktif peptitler ile antihipertensif, antitrombotik, antikanser, immunomodulatör ve antioksidan aktivitesi gösterdikleri için tıp ve farmakolji alanında da değerlendirilmektedir. Protein, amino asit, kollajen, jelatin ve yağ gibi katma değeri yüksek ürünler elde etmek için önemli bir kaynak olabilirler. Su ürünleri yetiştiriciliğinin sürdürülebilirliğine katkı sağlayacaktır. Kullanılan atık, enzim ve üretim şartlarının değişmesiyle elde edilen ürünün kalite ve fonksiyonel özellikleri farklılık göstermektedir. Proteazlar yüksek oranda hidroliz ile düşük molekül ağırlıklı peptit üretme kabiliyeti göstermektedir. Balık protein hidrolizatlarının amino asit bileşimi, besin değeri ve fonksiyonel özelliklere olan etkisinden dolayı önemlidir. Bir gıdanın protein kalitesini ve organizmaların ihtiyaçlarını karşılama kapasitesini o gıdanın sahip olduğu esansiyel amino asitler belirler. Birçok araştırıcı balık protein hidrolizatlarının amino asit içeriklerinin, balıkların türüne ve enzim çeşidine göre değişiklik sergilediğini bildirmişlerdir. Bu makalede farklı balık atık kompozisyonları, enzim konsantrasyonu, sıcaklık, zaman ve ph şartlarına göre elde edilen balık protein hidrolizatlarının özellikleri derlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, K., TOKUR, B. (2021). Nutritional Composition of Protein Hydrolyzate Produced from Fish Waste. Turkish Journal of Maritime and Marine Sciences, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 27–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/809284

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. FAO, 2020. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (2020). Sustainability in action, http://www.fao.org/3/ca9229en/CA9229EN.pdf (accessed 03.07.2020),Rome. Choe, U., Mustafa, A.M., Lin, H., Choe, U., Sheng, K., (2020). Anaerobic co-digestion of fish processing waste with a liquid fraction of hydrothermal carbonization of bamboo residue. Bioresour. Technol. 297, 122542. Kim, S.K., Mendis, E., (2006). Bioactive Compounds from Marine Processing Byproducts-A Review. Food Research International, 39, 383-393.
  2. Hsu, K., (2010). Purification of antioxidative peptides prepared from enzymatic hydrolysates of tuna dark muscle by-product. Food Chemistry, 122, 42-48 FAO, (2017). Committee on fisheries, sub-committee on fish trade, Sixteenth Session Busan, Republic of Korea, 4-8 September, 2017, Reduction of Fish Food Loss and Waste. FAO, (2014). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture opportunities and challenges. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 223 s. Esteban, M. B., Garcia, A. J., Ramos, P., Marquez, M. C., (2007). Evaluation of fruit– vegetable and fish wastes as alternative feedstuffs in pig diets. Waste Management, 27, 193–200.
  3. Dumay, J., (2006). Extraction de lipides en voie aqueuse par bioréacteur enzymatique combiné à l'ultrafiltration: application à la valorisation de co-produits de poisson (Sardina pilchardus). Ph.D. Thesis. Murray, J., Burt, J.R., (2001). The Composition of Fish. Ministry of Technology, Torry Research Station, Torry Advisory Note No. 38. Retrieved March 19, 2016, from http://www.fao.org/wairdocs/tan/x5916e/x5916e00.htm.
  4. Ghaedian, R., Coupland, J.N., Decker, E.A., McClements, D.J., (1998). Ultrasonic determination of fish composition. Journal Food Engineering, 323-337.
  5. Khiari, Z., Rico, D., Martin-Diana, A.B. & Barry-Ryan, C., (2015). Valorization of fish by-products: rheological, textural and microstructural properties of mackerel skin gelatins. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 19, 1, 180-191. DOI: 10.1007/s10163-015-0399-2
  6. Abbey, L., Glover-Amengor, M., Atikpo, M.O., Atter, A. & Toppe, J., (2017). Nutrient content of fish powder from low value fish and fish byproducts. Food Science and Nutrition, 5, 3, 374-379. DOI:10.1002/fsn3.402 Suvanich, V., Ghaedian, R., Chanamai, R., Decker, E.A.E.A., McClements, DJ., (2006). Prediction of proximate fish composition from ultrasonic properties: catfish, cod, flounder, mackerel and salmon. Journal of Food Science, 63, 966-968.
  7. Roslan, J., Mustapa