EVALUATION OF DIGITAL LITERACY STATUS OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The research sample consisted of 320 undergraduate students enrolled at the departments of nursing and emergency aid and disaster management in the 2020-2021 academic year.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:All statistical analyses were performed on SPSS 25.0, and p

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:2020-2021 Verileri

⚙️Variables:Üniversite · Öğrenci · Okuryazarlık

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate digital literacy among undergraduate students. Materials and Methods: The research sample consisted of 320 undergraduate students enrolled at the departments of nursing and emergency aid and disaster management in the 2020-2021 academic year. We collected the data using the Digital Literacy Scale, the Online Social Support Scale, and the Academic Self-Efficacy Scale. In the data analysis, we considered percentiles and means and performed one-way analysis of variance, pearson correlation and post hoc tests (Tukey HSD and Games Howell multiple comparison test). All statistical analyses were performed on SPSS 25.0, and p

Keywords

Üniversite Öğrenci Okuryazarlık Dijital Okuryazarlık

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKYÖRÜK, N., DÜZEN, K. Ö. (2021). EVALUATION OF DIGITAL LITERACY STATUS OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Turkish Journal of Health Science and Life, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 116–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/808895

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

Referans1 1. Onursoy S. Üniversite Gençliğinin Dijital Okuryazarlik Düzeyleri: Anadolu Üniversitesi Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi 2018
6(2):889-1013. Referans 2. Gilster P. Digital Literacy, New York: John Wiley,1997 Referans 3. Eshet Y. Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital Era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 2004
13(1):93-106. Referans 4. Global Digital. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-turkey. 2021
Erişim Tarihi: 10.08.2021. Referans 5. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Hanehalkı Bilişim Teknolojileri (BT) Kullanım https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim Arastirmasi. 2020
Erişim Tarihi: 10.08.2021. Referans 6. Çiftçi H. Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Sosyal Medya Bağımlılığı. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 2018
7(4):417-434. Referans 7. Pornsakulvanich V. Personality, Attitudes, Social Influences, and Social Networking Site Usage Predicting Online Social Support. Computers in Human Behavior 2017
Referans 8. Okur HD. Gençlik ve Sosyal Paylaşım Siteleri. Düşünce Dünyasında Türkiz Siyaset Ve Kültür Dergisi. 23(4), 93-106. Referans 9. Chen W, Choi ASK. Internet and social support among Chinese migrants in Singapore. New Media and Society 2011
13(7):1067–1084. Referans 10. Lu W, Hampton KN Beyond the power of networks: Differentiating network structure from social media affordances for perceived social support. New Media and Society 2017
19(6): 861–879. Referans 11. Bişkin SÖ, Kocaayan F. Sanal Sosyal Destek Ölçeği Uyarlama Çalışması. International Human and Civilization Congress from Past to Future Abstracts Books 2019:114. Referans 12. Liu D, Wright K, Hu B. A meta-analysis of social network site use and social support. Computers & Education 2018
Referans 13. Liu CY, Yu CP. Can Facebook use induce well-being?. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2013
16(9):674–679. Referans 14. Özpulat F, Özvarış ŞB. Akşehir Sağlık Yüksekokulu Öğrencilerinin Özyeterlilik Düzeyleri ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Algılarının Belirlenmesi. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi 2019
28(2):98-107. Referans 15. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy, In: Ramachaudran VS (ed.). Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. New York, Academic Press,1994. Referans 16. Millburg SN. The effects of environmental risk factors on at-risk urban high school students’ academic self-efficacy. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Univers