Journals / Turkish Journal of Geosciences / 2021 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Classification and generation of the enclaves in Karapınar-Karacadağ volcanic rocks (Central Anatolia)

Pages
30–46
Publication Date
2021-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to petrographic observations and geochemical data we propose that fractional crystallization, magma mixing and assimilation processes have a key role in the evolution of the KKVRs and their enclaves.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Karapınar-Karacadağ Volcanic Rocks (KKVR) have very complex magmatic history and outcropped the southwestern part of the Cappadocia Volcanic Province (Central Anatolia).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The magma mixing/mingling enclaves (Type 1, 7, 8) are the mixing products of coeval more felsic and mafic magmas.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to petrographic observations and geochemical data we propose that fractional crystallization, magma mixing and assimilation processes have a key role in the evolution of the KKVRs and their enclaves.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:magma mixing enclave · magma segregation enclave · Volcanic rocks

Abstract

Karapınar-Karacadağ Volcanic Rocks (KKVR) have very complex magmatic history and outcropped the southwestern part of the Cappadocia Volcanic Province (Central Anatolia). Here we present the petrography and whole-rock chemistry of the enclave-bearing rocks to constrain their source and evolution history. These petrographic observation and geochemical data reveal that the enclaves in the Karapınar-Karacadağ volcanic rocks are magma mixing/mingling enclaves (MME), magma segregation enclaves (MSE), and xenoliths. Here we discriminated these enclaves into eight different types according to their mineral composition and textural features. The magma mixing/mingling enclaves (Type 1, 7, 8) are the mixing products of coeval more felsic and mafic magmas. They show hypocrystalline porphyritic, holocrystalline granular, and intergranular textures, and rich in mafic minerals, and have characteristic petrographic features such as quenched amphibole, bladed biotite, ocelli-quartz, sieved and cellular plagioclases. In andesites they range from basalt to andesite in composition. However, in basalts, they are in basaltic composition. The magma segregation enclaves (Type 2, 4, 5, 6), which are observed in almost all the KKVRs, are cognate xenolith because of plucking from the different parts of the magma chamber. They are holocrystalline and granular in texture. The magma segregation enclaves contained in the andesitic host rocks are hornblende gabbro and pyroxene gabbro in composition, whereas in the basaltic host rocks they are dunite, lherzolite, and basalt in composition. The xenolithic enclaves (Type 3) are observed in the basalts as quartz, plagioclase, biotite, and amphibole xenocrysts. Major oxides and trace element data of the studied rocks indicate that the MSEs are more primitive than their host rocks, and all of the enclaves (MME-MSE) are in accordance with their hosts. According to petrographic observations and geochemical data we propose that fractional crystallization, magma mixing and assimilation processes have a key role in the evolution of the KKVRs and their enclaves.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, G. G., KURT, H., ASAN, K. (2021). Classification and generation of the enclaves in Karapınar-Karacadağ volcanic rocks (Central Anatolia). Turkish Journal of Geosciences, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 30–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/808860

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aydar, E., Gündoğdu, N., Bayhan, H., & Gourgaud, A. (1994). Kapadokya bölgesinin Kuvaterner yaşlı volkanizmasının volkanik-yapısal ve petrolojik incelenmesi. TÜBİTAK Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 3, 25-42.
  2. Barbarin, B., & Didier, J. (1991). Review of the main hypotheses proposed for the genesis and evolution of mafic microgranular enclaves. In Enclaves and granite petrology. Barbarin, B., & Didier, J. (1992). Genesis and evolution of mafic microgranular enclaves through various types of interaction between coexisting felsic and mafic magmas. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 83(1-2), 145-153.
  3. Best, M.G. (2003). Igneous and metamorphic petrology (2 ed.): John Wiley & Sons. Browne, B. L., Eichelberger, J. C., Patino, L. C., Vogel, T. A., Uto, K., & Hoshizumi, H. (2006). Magma mingling as indicated by texture and Sr/Ba ratios of plagioclase phenocrysts from Unzen volcano, SW Japan. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 154(1), 103-116.
  4. Cantagrel, J.M., Didier, J., & Gourgaud, A. (1984). Magma mixing: origin of intermediate rocks and “enclaves” from volcanism to plutonism. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 35(1), 63-76.
  5. Chappell, B.W. (1996). Magma mixing and the production of compositional variation within granite suites: evidence from the granites of southeastern Australia. Journal of Petrology, 37(3), 449-470.
  6. Chappell, B.W., White, A.J.R., & Wyborn, D. (1987). The importance of residual source material (restite) in granite petrogenesis. Journal of Petrology, 28(6), 1111-1138.
  7. Chen, Y., Chappell, B.W., & White, A.J.R. (1991). Mafic enclaves of some I-type granites of the Palaeozoic Lachlan Fold Belt, southeastern Australia. In Enclaves and granite petrology (pp. 113-124).
  8. Dahlquist, J.A. (2002). Mafic microgranular enclaves: early segregation from metaluminous magma (Sierra de Chepes), Pampean Ranges, NW Argentina. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 15(6), 643-655.
  9. Di Giuseppe, P., Agostini, S., Manetti, P., Savaşçın, M.Y., & Conticelli, S. (2018). Sub-lithospheric origin of Na-alkaline and calc-alkaline magmas in a post-collisional tectonic regime: Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes in recent monogenetic volcanism of Cappadocia, Central Turkey. Lithos, 316-317, 304-322.
  10. Didier, J. (1973). Granites and their enclaves: the bearing of enclaves on the origin of granites. Didier, J. (1991). The different types of enclaves in granites-Nomenclature. Enclaves and granite petrology, 19-23.
  11. Dogan-Kulahci, G.D., Temel