Journals / Turkish Journal of Food and Agriculture Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Efficacy of a pilot-scale ultrasonication system for pasteurization of milk

Pages
50–55
Publication Date
2021-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The maximum cost was estimated at 2.778,00 € for the system and at 3.624,00 € for plate heat exchanger to pasteurize 20.000 L of milk. 96.52% amplitude, 40 min, and 53.50 °C were determined jointly as the optimal operational settings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to test a pilot-scale continuous ultrasonication (US) system to pasteurize whole milk in terms of physical properties, energy consumption, and inactivation of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total mesophilic aerobic bacteria (TMAB), total coliform (TC), total enterobactericeae (TE), and Escherichia coli.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Except for those treated by 90% amplitude for 20 and 30 min, the samples were found negative for ALP activity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The maximum cost was estimated at 2.778,00 € for the system and at 3.624,00 € for plate heat exchanger to pasteurize 20.000 L of milk. 96.52% amplitude, 40 min, and 53.50 °C were determined jointly as the optimal operational settings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ultrasonication · Milk processing · Optimization

Abstract

This study aimed to test a pilot-scale continuous ultrasonication (US) system to pasteurize whole milk in terms of physical properties, energy consumption, and inactivation of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total mesophilic aerobic bacteria (TMAB), total coliform (TC), total enterobactericeae (TE), and Escherichia coli. Except for those treated by 90% amplitude for 20 and 30 min, the samples were found negative for ALP activity. Inactivation of TC, TMAB, TE, and E. coli rose with an increased amplitude and temperature. The maximum cost was estimated at 2.778,00 € for the system and at 3.624,00 € for plate heat exchanger to pasteurize 20.000 L of milk. 96.52% amplitude, 40 min, and 53.50 °C were determined jointly as the optimal operational settings.

🔖

Cite This Article

EVRENDİLEK, G. A., BODRUK, A., ACAR, F. (2021). Efficacy of a pilot-scale ultrasonication system for pasteurization of milk. Turkish Journal of Food and Agriculture Sciences, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 50–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/808738

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Asaithambi, N., Singha, P., Dwivedi, M., & Singh, S. K. (2019). Hydrodynamic cavitation and its application in food and beverage industry: A review. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 42(5), e13144. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13144
  2. Ashokkumar, M., Bhaskaracharya, R., Kentish, S., Lee, J., Palmer, M., & Zisu, B. (2010). The ultrasonic processing of dairy products—An overview. Dairy Science & Technology, 90(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1051/dst/2009044 Bermúdez-Aguirre, D., Mobbs, T., & Barbosa-Cánovas, G. V. (2011). Ultrasound Applications in Food Processing. In H. Feng, G. Barbosa-Canovas, & J. Weiss (Eds.), Ultrasound Technologies for Food and Bioprocessing (pp. 65–105). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7472-3_3
  3. Cameron, M., McMaster, L. D., & Britz, T. J. (2010). Impact of ultrasound on dairy spoilage microbes and milk components. Dairy Science & Technology, 90(1), 119–119. https://doi.org/10.1051/dst/2010003
  4. Carpenter, J., Badve, M., Rajoriya, S., George, S., Saharan, V., & Pandit, A. (2016). Hydrodynamic cavitation: An emerging technology for the intensification of various chemical and physical processes in a chemical process industry. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 33. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2016-0032
  5. Chandrapala, J., Martin, G. J. O., Zisu, B., Kentish, S. E., & Ashokkumar, M. (2012). The effect of ultrasound on casein micelle integrity. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(12), 6882–6890. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5318
  6. Chemat, F., Zill-e-Huma, & Khan, M. K. (2011). Applications of ultrasound in food technology: Processing, preservation and extraction. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 18(4), 813–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.11.023
  7. Chouliara, E., Georgogianni, K. G., Kanellopoulou, N., & Kontominas, M. G. (2010). Effect of ultrasonication on microbiological, chemical and sensory properties of raw, thermized and pasteurized milk. International Dairy Journal, 20(5), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2009.12.006
  8. De Jong, P., & Villamiel, M. (2000). Inactivation of Pseudomonas flourescens and Streptococcus thermophilus in trypticase soy broth and total bacteria count in milk by continuous-flow ultrasonic treatment and conventional heating. Journal of Food Engineering, 45, 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00059-5
  9. Ganesan, B., Martini, S., Solorio, J., & Walsh, M. K. (2015). Determining the effects of high intensity ultrasound on the reduction of microbes in milk and orange juice using response sur