Journals / Turkish Journal of Food and Agriculture Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Postharvest losses in food grains – A Review

Pages
25–36
Publication Date
2021-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the end, research gaps were identified and recommendations were provided about minimizing grain contamination and postharvest losses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Grains (cereals and legumes) are universal foods that provide calories, proteins, essential minerals and vitamins.
📊
Key Findings & Data:They are essential to the nutrition of many including infants and children.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the end, research gaps were identified and recommendations were provided about minimizing grain contamination and postharvest losses.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Grains · postharvest losses · insect’s infestation

Abstract

Grains (cereals and legumes) are universal foods that provide calories, proteins, essential minerals and vitamins. They are essential to the nutrition of many including infants and children. Attack by insects and microorganisms, particularly fungi, during drying, storage and processing, affects the quality, safety and market value of grains. Fungal attacks before or during drying can be disastrous, the effect can persist throughout the supply chain. Postharvest grain losses pose challenges to food and nutritional security, public health, and many developing nations' economy. Postharvest storage structures and packaging materials are expected to extend the shelf life of the grains by protecting them from insects, microorganisms, environmental factors and making the microenvironment unfavorable for insect and microbial activities. Traditional storage and packaging materials are highly inefficient in this sense and are associated with quality degradation. Traditional storage and packaging materials commonly used by farmers, mostly in developing countries, include granary, crib, wooden box, gunny bag and polypropylene woven bag. Modern storage and packaging materials commonly used are metal silo and hermetic bags; they are effective but unfortunately cannot be afforded by most farmers in developing countries. The article reviewed postharvest storage management of cereals and legumes. Literature was gathered through a comprehensive literature review. The use of various traditional storage and packaging materials for grains was debated. Techniques for the prevention of postharvest losses were extensively discussed, emphasis was given to novel technology and the use of natural insecticides. Challenges associated with controlling postharvest losses were also summarised. In the end, research gaps were identified and recommendations were provided about minimizing grain contamination and postharvest losses.

🔖

Cite This Article

ABDULLAHİ, N., DANDAGO, M. A. (2021). Postharvest losses in food grains – A Review. Turkish Journal of Food and Agriculture Sciences, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 25–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/808735

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abass, A.B., Fischler, M., Schneider, K., Daudi, S., Gaspar, A., Rüst, J., Kabula, E., Ndunguru, G., Madulu, D., & Msola, D. (2018). On-farm comparison of different postharvest storage technologies in a maize farming system of Tanzania Central Corridor. Journal of Stored Products Research, 77, 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2018.03.002
  2. Abdoulaye, T., Herbert, J., Iita, A., Alexander, C., Baributsa, D., Kadjo, D., Moussa, B., Omotilewa, O., Ricker-gilbert, J., & Shiferaw, F. (2015). Postharvest Loss of Maize and Grain Legumes in Sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from Household Survey Data in Seven Countries. Purdue Extention, EC-807-W, 1-4.
  3. Achaglinkame, A.M., Opoku, N., & Amagloh, F.K. (2017). Aflatoxin contamination in cereals and legumes to reconsider usage as complementary food ingredients for Ghanaian infants: A review. Journal of Nutrition and Intermediary Metabolism, 10, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnim.2017.09.001
  4. Adarkwah, C., Obeng-Ofori, D., Hörmann, V., Ulrichs, C., & Schöller, M. (2017). Bioefficacy of enhanced diatomaceous earth and botanical powders on the mortality and progeny production of Acanthoscelides obtectus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Sitophilus granarius (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) and Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebr. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 37(4): 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758417000170
  5. Affognon, H., Mutungi, C., Sanginga, P., & Borgemeister, C. (2015). Unpacking postharvest losses in sub-Saharan Africa: A Meta-Analysis. World Development, 66, 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.002
  6. Afzal, I., Bakhtavar, M.A., Ishfaq, M., Sagheer, M., & Baributsa, D. (2017). Maintaining dryness during storage contributes to higher maize seed quality. Journal of Stored Products Research, 72, 49-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2017.04.001
  7. Aguiar, A.R., Alvarenga, E.S., Silva, E.M.P., Farias, E.S., & Picanço, M.C. (2019). Synthesis, insecticidal activity, and phytotoxicity of novel chiral amides. Pest Management Science, https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5289
  8. Akinneye, J.O., Adedolapo, A., & Adesina, F.P. (2018). Quantification of Organophosphate and Carbamate residue on stored grains in Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Biology and Medicine, 2(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.17352/jbm.000003
  9. Alam, M.J., Hoque, M., Munsura, A., Rony, N.H., & Haque, S. (2019).
  10. Sustainable management of corn borer, Helicoverpa zea of maize through using some chemicals and bio-rational insecticides. Journal of Scie