Journals / Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching Practices / 2020 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Pupils’ reflective thinking in solving linear equation system problem

Pages
19–27
Publication Date
2020-06-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We successfully concluded that different mathematical abilities provide differences in pupils' reflective thinking for solving LES problems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Reflective thinking begins with perplexity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The qualitative research employed 46 Indonesian reflective thinkers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We successfully concluded that different mathematical abilities provide differences in pupils' reflective thinking for solving LES problems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:pupils’ reflective thinking · mathematical abilities · linear equation system problems

Abstract

Reflective thinking begins with perplexity. Efforts to overcome perplexity by involving the experience and knowledge. In the process of reflective thinking, problem solvers need to use mathematical abilities. The research reveals pupils’ reflective thinking in solving Linear Equation System (LES) problem in term of their mathematical abilities. The qualitative research employed 46 Indonesian reflective thinkers. A reflective thinker is a pupil employes experience and knowledge in solving LES problem. The instruments have been validated by mathematicians and education experts. Data collected by some methods among others: test, observation, and in-depth interview. Triangulation conducted as data validation process. We successfully concluded that different mathematical abilities provide differences in pupils' reflective thinking for solving LES problems. It is necessary to develop reflective thinking skills in pupils with low mathematical abilities.

🔖

Cite This Article

KHOLID, M. N., SA'DIJAH, C., HİDAYANTO, E., PERMADİ, H., FIRDAREZA, R. M. F. (2020). Pupils’ reflective thinking in solving linear equation system problem. Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching Practices, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 19–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/80717

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Afshar, H. S., & Farahani, M. (2018). Inhibitors to EFL Teachers’ Reflective Teaching and EFL Learners’ Reflective Thinking and the Role of Teaching Experience and Academic Degree in Reflection Perception. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 19(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2017.1351353
  2. Annisavitri, R., Sa’dijah, C., Qohar, A., Sa’Diyah, M., & Anwar, L. (2020). Analysis of Mathematical Literacy Test as A Problem-Solving Ability Assessment of Junior High School Students. AIP Conference Proceedings 2215 - 060002, 060002-1-060002–060007. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000648
  3. Bishop, J. P. (2012). “She’s Always Been the Smart One. I’ve Always Been the Dumb One”: Identities in the Mathematics Classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 34–74. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.1.0034
  4. Cavanagh, M. (2011). Active Learning in Higher Education. Social and Behaviour Science And, 12(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1469787410387724
  5. Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of The Relation of Reflective Thinking to The Educative Process (1st ed.). D.C. HEATH AND COMPANY. DiDonato, N. C. (2013). Effective Self- and Co-Regulation in Collaborative Learning Groups: An Analysis of How Students Regulate Problem Solving of Authentic Interdisciplinary Tasks. Instructional Science, 41, 25–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9206-9
  6. Dubinsky. (2002). Reflective Abstraction in Advanced Mathematical Thinking. In Mathematics Education Library (pp. 95–126). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1_7
  7. Ghanizadeh, A. (2017). The Interplay Between Reflective Thinking, Critical Thinking, Self-Monitoring, and Academic Achievement in Higher Education. Higher Education, 74(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0031-y
  8. Handayani, U. F., Sa’Dijah, C., Sisworo, Sa’Diyah, M., & Anwar, L. (2020). Mathematical creative thinking skill of middle-ability students in solving contextual problems. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215(April), 060007-1-060007–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000645
  9. Hanley, P., Slavin, R., & Elliott, L. (2015).
  10. Thinking, Doing, Talking Science: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary. Hidajat, F. A., Sa’dijah, C., Sudirman, & Susiswo. (2019). Exploration of Students ’ Arguments to Identify Perplexity from Reflective Process on Mathematical Problems. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 573–586. https://do