Journals / Toros Üniversitesi İİSBF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 15

MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANIES: WHAT THEY APPRISE ON TWITTER?

Pages
90–103
Publication Date
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the sentiment analysis which was performed on tweet contents, it was found that 39.1% of them were partially positive, 31% were positive, 25.1% were neutral, 4.1% were partially negative and 0.7% of them were negative.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study aims to analyze how the World's Most Innovative Companies apprise themselves on the Twitter platform.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, tweets published by the top 50 companies in the 2021 report of the World's Most Innovative Companies published by Forbes, were discussed as an example.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the sentiment analysis which was performed on tweet contents, it was found that 39.1% of them were partially positive, 31% were positive, 25.1% were neutral, 4.1% were partially negative and 0.7% of them were negative.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Innovation · Semantic Analysis · Twitter

Özet

The study aims to analyze how the World's Most Innovative Companies apprise themselves on the Twitter platform. To reach this aim, the data mining method is used. In the study, tweets published by the top 50 companies in the 2021 report of the World's Most Innovative Companies published by Forbes, were discussed as an example. Tweets contain the dates between 03.06.2021 and 10.06.2021. The tweets were evaluated through the Maxqda 20.04 program, sentiment analysis was performed, the frequency frequencies of the words included in the tweets were examined and the word cloud was extracted. According to 1200 tweets analyzed, the most frequently used words were new (12.2%), help (6.9%), learn (6.7%), details (6.4%), and team (6.1%). The most frequently used hashtags other than the companies' own names observed as #pride (10.3), #worldenvironmentday (5.8%), #ai (5.2%), #pmi (4.5%), #primeday (3%). 9) and #covid19 (3.2%). In the sentiment analysis which was performed on tweet contents, it was found that 39.1% of them were partially positive, 31% were positive, 25.1% were neutral, 4.1% were partially negative and 0.7% of them were negative. It is considered that this study, which is carried out on how businesses that want to take their place in the innovation world, share their "what" with the whole world and their stakeholders, whose innovation studies they follow, will be beneficial for the managers of companies trying to be innovative and academicians working in the field on innovation.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYGISIZ, E. G. (2021). MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANIES: WHAT THEY APPRISE ON TWITTER?. Toros Üniversitesi İİSBF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 15, 90–103. https://ajindex.com/articles/807167

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ainin, S., Feizollah, A., Anuar, N. B., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Sentiment analyses of multilingual tweets on halal tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives, 34(February), 100658. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.tmp.2020.100658 Ali, H., Moin, S., Karim, A. & Shamshirband. S. (2018). Machine Learning-Based Sentiment Analysis for Twitter Accounts. Mathematical and Computational Applications 23, no. 1: 11, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca23010011.
  2. Almossa, S.Y. (2021). University students’ perspectives toward learning and assessment during COVID-19. Educ Inf Technol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10554-8
  3. Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies, and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch, Feb. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.108.9995&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  4. Argenti, P.A. & Barnes, C.M. (2009), Digital Strategies for Powerful Communications. New York: McGraw Hill Barker, A. (2002). Yenilikçiliğin Simyası (A. Kardam, Çev.) İstanbul.
  5. Mess Yayın. Belloso, W.H. (2020). On innovation. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 54, 1068–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-020-00125-3
  6. Cheng, C. F., Chang, M. L., & Li, C. S. (2013). Configural paths to successful product innovation. Journal of Business Research, 66 (12), 2561–2573
  7. Drucker, P. (1985). Principles of successful innovation. Research Management. Vol. 28, No. 5, September-October, 10-12
  8. Dyer, J. & Gregersen, H. (2018). How we rank the most ınnovative companies 2018. https://www.forbes.com/sites/innovatorsdna/2018/05/29/how-we-rank-the-most-innovative-companies-2018/?sh=2eebe2ac1e3c
  9. Elçi, Ş. (2006). İnovasyon. Kalkınma ve Rekabetin Anahtarı. 7. Print. Meteksan Bilişim & BTHaber Fisk, P. 2011. Yaratıcı Deha (N. Özata, Çev.). İstanbul:
  10. Kapital Medya Hizmetleri Freeman, C. (1995). The 'National System of Innovation' in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics 1995, 19, 5-24
  11. Graf, I., Gerwing, H., Hoefer, K., Ehlebracht, D., Christ, H. & Braumann, B. (2020). Social media and orthodontics: A mixedmethods analysis of orthodontic-related posts on Twitter and Instagram. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. August, Vol 158, Issue 2, 221-228.
  12. Granstrand, O. & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90-91, 102098., 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.technovation.2019.102098
  13. Godin, B. (2008) Innovation: The History of a Category. Montreal: Project of