SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Journal of Cognitive Systems / 2021 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

A COMPUTATIONAL FRAMEWORK OF GOAL DIRECTED VOLUNTARY MOTION GENERATION AND CONTROL LOOP IN HUMANOID ROBOTS

Evren DAĞLARLI
Pages
13–17
Publication Date
2021-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus motion disorders can be reconstructed not only in humanoid robots but also in humans via some locomotion equipment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, it is aimed to construct a computational framework related to bio-inspired motion generation and control systems for humanoid robots.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To acquire natural motion patterns in humanoid robots, behaviors observed from biological motor systems in humans and other mammals should be analyzed in detail.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus motion disorders can be reconstructed not only in humanoid robots but also in humans via some locomotion equipment.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Motion generation · Control loop · Motion correction

Abstract

In this paper, it is aimed to construct a computational framework related to bio-inspired motion generation and control systems for humanoid robots. To acquire natural motion patterns in humanoid robots, behaviors observed from biological motor systems in humans and other mammals should be analyzed in detail. Computational mechanisms are mainly placed on the bio-physical plausible neural structures embodied in different dynamics. The main components of the system are composed of the limbic system, neocortex, cerebellum, brainstem, and spinal cord modules. Internal dynamics of these modules include a nonlinear estimator (e.g. chaotic attractor), memory formation, learning (neural plasticity) procedure. While the proposed novel neuro-cognitive framework is performing goal-directed voluntary motion generation and control tasks, also it estimates the amount of motion errors and computes motion correction signals. By this study, some motion-based central nervous system lesions (e.g. epilepsy, Parkinson, etc.) can be computationally modeled so that impairments of motor control commands are detected. Thus motion disorders can be reconstructed not only in humanoid robots but also in humans via some locomotion equipment.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAĞLARLI, E. (2021). A COMPUTATIONAL FRAMEWORK OF GOAL DIRECTED VOLUNTARY MOTION GENERATION AND CONTROL LOOP IN HUMANOID ROBOTS. The Journal of Cognitive Systems, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 13–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/806216

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Nagabandi, A., Konolige, K., Levine, S., & Kumar, V. (2020, May). Deep dynamics models for learning dexterous manipulation. In Conference on Robot Learning (pp. 1101-1112). PMLR
  2. Arimoto, S. (1995). Fundamental problems of robot control: part II a nonlinear circuit theory towards an understanding of dexterous motions. Robotica, 13(2), 111-122
  3. Mattar, E. (2013). A survey of bio-inspired robotics hands implementation: New directions in dexterous manipulation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 61(5), 517-544
  4. Ott, C., Eiberger, O., Friedl, W., Bauml, B., Hillenbrand, U., Borst, C.,. & Hirzinger, G. (2006, December). A humanoid two-arm system for dexterous manipulation. In 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (pp. 276-283). IEEE
  5. Maekawa, A., Matsubara, S., Wakisaka, S., Uriu, D., Hiyama, A., & Inami, M. (2020, April). Dynamic Motor Skill Synthesis with Human-Machine Mutual Actuation. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12)
  6. Abbatematteo, B., Rosen, E., Tellex, S., & Konidaris, G. (2021). Bootstrapping Motor Skill Learning with Motion Planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.04736
  7. Wang, N., Chen, C., & Di Nuovo, A. (2020). A framework of hybrid force/motion skills learning for robots. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems
  8. Zeng, C., Chen, X., Wang, N., & Yang, C. (2021). Learning compliant robotic movements based on biomimetic motor adaptation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 135, 103668
  9. Liu, R., Zhang, Q., Chen, Y., Wang, J., & Yang, L. (2020). A Biologically Constrained Cerebellar Model With Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Limb Control. IEEE Access, 8, 222199-222210
  10. Tolu, S., Capolei, M. C., Vannucci, L., Laschi, C., Falotico, E., & Hernandez, M. V. (2020). A cerebellum-inspired learning approach for adaptive and anticipatory control. International journal of neural systems, 30(01), 1950028
  11. Zahra, O., Tolu, S., & Navarro-Alarcon, D. (2021). Differential mapping spiking neural network for sensor-based robot control. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 16(3), 036008
  12. Shin, D. J. (2020). A Convolutional Neural Network-based Policy Inspired by the Cerebellum
  13. Yang, S., Wang, J., Zhang, N., Deng, B., Pang, Y., & Azghadi, M. R. (2021). CerebelluMorphic: Large-Scale Neuromorphic Model and Architecture for Supervised Motor Learning. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
  14. Parr, T., Limanowski,