Journals / Stratejik Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

COMPETITIVE INERTIA, FUNCTIONAL STRATEGIES AND TEMPORARY COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: A MODAL PROPOSITION

REKABETÇİ ATALET, İŞLEVSEL STRATEJİLER VE GEÇİCİ REKABET AVANTAJI: KAVRAMSAL BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Pages
208–234
Publication Date
2020-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this study is to reveal the importance of functional strategies in terms of sectoral organization model, resource-based approach and guerrilla logic to conceptually evaluate relationships between competitive inertia, functional strategies and temporary competitive advantage in organizations and to gain temporary competitive advantage in hyper competition environments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Organizations have to adapt themselves to their environments in order to survive.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, managers try to gain a competitive advantage by determining the most suitable strategy that is suitable for them and successfully adapts to these technological and industrial changes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this study is to reveal the importance of functional strategies in terms of sectoral organization model, resource-based approach and guerrilla logic to conceptually evaluate relationships between competitive inertia, functional strategies and temporary competitive advantage in organizations and to gain temporary competitive advantage in hyper competition environments.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:rekabetçi atalet · işlevsel stratejiler · geçici rekabet avantajı

Abstract

Organizations have to adapt themselves to their environments in order to survive. They try to survive and gain competitive advantage in a competitive, turbulent and unstable market resulting from rapid technological advances. However, in today’s highly dynamic and hyper competitive environment, it is difficult to adapt to the environment and obtain sustainable competitive advantage by using firm-level resources. Therefore, managers try to gain a competitive advantage by determining the most suitable strategy that is suitable for them and successfully adapts to these technological and industrial changes. If organizations do not take measures to maintain their competitive advantage by falling into inertia and do not support competitive inertia with innovations and functional strategies, it is inevitable for the organization to weaken and fall behinds of its competitors. The purpose of this study is to reveal the importance of functional strategies in terms of sectoral organization model, resource-based approach and guerrilla logic to conceptually evaluate relationships between competitive inertia, functional strategies and temporary competitive advantage in organizations and to gain temporary competitive advantage in hyper competition environments.

Özet

Örgütler, hayatta kalmak için çevreye uyum sağlamak zorundadır. Örgütler, hızlı teknolojik gelişmelerden kaynaklanan aşırı rekabetçi, çalkantılı ve dengesiz bir pazarda hayatta kalmaya ve rekabet avantajı elde etmeye çalışmaktadır. Fakat günümüzün oldukça dinamik ve aşırı rekabetçi çevresinde, firma düzeyinde kaynakları kullanarak çevreye uyum sağlamak ve sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajı elde etmek zordur. Bu nedenle yöneticiler, kendileri için uygun olan ve bu teknolojik ve endüstriyel değişikliklere başarılı bir şekilde uyum sağlayan en uygun stratejiyi belirleyerek rekabetçi bir avantaj elde etmeye çalışmaktadır. Eğer örgütler atalete düşerek elde ettikleri rekabet avantajını sürdürecek tedbirler almazlarsa ve rekabetçi ataleti, yeniliklerle ve işlevsel stratejilerle desteklemezlerse, örgütün zayıflaması ve rakipleri karşısında geri kalması kaçınılmazdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, sektörel örgüt modeli, kaynak tabanlı yaklaşım ve gerilla mantığı çerçevesinde, örgütlerde rekabetçi atalet, işlevsel stratejiler ve geçici rekabet avantajı arasındaki ilişkileri kavramsal olarak değerlendirmek ve aşırı rekabet ortamlarında geçici rekabet avantajı elde etmede işlevsel stratejilerin önemini ortaya koymaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHYA, M. (2020). COMPETITIVE INERTIA, FUNCTIONAL STRATEGIES AND TEMPORARY COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: A MODAL PROPOSITION. Stratejik Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 208–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/802821

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Amburgey, T.L. ve Miner, A.S. (1992). Strategic momentum: The effects of repetitive, positional and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 335-348.
  2. Andrews, K. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Irvin: Homewood. Ansoff, H.I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw Hill. Ansoff, H.I. (1992). A profile in intellectual growth. (Ed. A.D. Bedeian) Management Laureates: A Collection of Autobiographical Essays içinde (s.s. 1-39),
  3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  4. Ansoff, H.I. (2007). Strategic management. (11. Baskı), New York: Palgrave McMillan Ansoff, H.I., Kipley, D., Lewis, A.O, Helm-Stevens, R. ve Ansoff, R. (2019). Implementing strategic management. (3. Baskı), Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Audia,P.G., Locke, E.A. ve Smith, K.G. (2000). The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 837-853.
  5. Barca, M. (2009). Stratejik yönetim düşüncesinin gelişimi. Dosya, Ankara:
  6. Ankara Sanayi Odası. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  7. Chen, M.J., Smith, K.G. ve Grimm, C.M. (1992). Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses. Management Science, 38(3), 439-455. D’Aveni, R.A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: Free Press. D’Aveni, R.A. (1995). Coping with hypercompetition: Utilizing the new 7S’s framework. Academy of Management Executive, 9(3): 45-57. D’Aveni, R.A. (1999). Strategic supremacy through disruption and dominance. Sloan Management Review, Spring: 127-135. D’Aveni, R.A., Dagnino, G.B. ve Smith, K.G. (2010). The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1371-1385.
  8. Derfus, P.J., Maggitti, P.G., Grimm, C.M. ve Smith, K.G. (2008). The red queen effect: Competitive actions and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 61-80.
  9. Dess, G.G. ve Davis, P.S. (1984). Porter’s (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 467-488.
  10. Dutton, J.E. ve Duncan, R.B. (1987). The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 279-295.
  11. Eisenhardt, K. ve Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities. What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10), 1105-1121