Journals / Sosyal Bilimler Akademi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

A LITERATURE REVIEW ON CORPORATE SOCİAL RESPONSİBİLİTY

KURUMSAL SOSYAL SORUMLULUK ÜZERİNE BİR LİTERATÜR TARAMASI

Pages
195–205
Publication Date
2020-11-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, after considering conceptually, the aims, models, advantages and disadvantages of corporate social responsibility are examined in detail.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The series of conscious efforts or actions that organizations undertake to create a better social order, improve employee rights and contribute to environmental sustainability on a firm basis are expressed as corporate social responsibility.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a matter of fact, in organizations, it is seen that corporate social responsibility increases productivity, raises employee motivation, reduces employee turnover rate, minimizes stakeholder pressures, creates a reliable corporate company image, enables more investors to participate in the company and increases its competitive power.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, after considering conceptually, the aims, models, advantages and disadvantages of corporate social responsibility are examined in detail.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk · Rekabet · Sürdürülebilirlik

Abstract

The series of conscious efforts or actions that organizations undertake to create a better social order, improve employee rights and contribute to environmental sustainability on a firm basis are expressed as corporate social responsibility. Social responsibility is an important element that should not be neglected on behalf of companies in the process of carrying out organizational activities. As a matter of fact, in organizations, it is seen that corporate social responsibility increases productivity, raises employee motivation, reduces employee turnover rate, minimizes stakeholder pressures, creates a reliable corporate company image, enables more investors to participate in the company and increases its competitive power. In this study, after considering conceptually, the aims, models, advantages and disadvantages of corporate social responsibility are examined in detail.

Özet

Organizasyonların daha iyi bir toplumsal düzenin oluşturulması, çalışan haklarının iyileştirilmesi ve firma bazında çevresel sürdürülebilirliğe katkı sunmak amacıyla girişmiş oldukları bilinçli çabalar veya eylemler dizisi kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk olarak ifade edilir. Örgütsel faaliyetlerin yürütülmesi sürecinde sosyal sorumluluk, firmalar adına ihmal edilmemesi gereken önemli bir unsur olarak dikkat çekmektedir. Nitekim organizasyonlarda, kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun üretkenliği arttırdığı, çalışan motivasyonunu yükselterek iş gören devir hızını düşürdüğü, paydaş kaynaklı baskıları en alt düzeye çektiği, güvenilir kurumsal bir firma imajı oluşturduğu, daha fazla yatırımcıyı firma bünyesine katabilme imkanına kavuşturduğu ve rekabet gücünü arttırdığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada kavramsal olarak ele alındıktan sonra kurumsal sosyal sorumluğun amaçları, modelleri, avantajları ve dezavantajları detaylı bir şekilde irdelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEYİTOĞULLARI, O., BİLEN, A. (2020). A LITERATURE REVIEW ON CORPORATE SOCİAL RESPONSİBİLİTY. Sosyal Bilimler Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 195–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/801406

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Ackerman, R. & Bauer, R. A. (1976). Corporate Social Responsiveness: The Modern Dilemma. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company. Aluchna, M. (2014). The Effectiveness of CSR Initiatives and their Impact upon Stakeholders, In Idowu, S. O., Kasum, A. S., and Mermod, A.Y. (Eds.), People, Planet and Profit: Socio-Economic Perspectives of CSR. Gower, Surrey, pp. 199-217.
  2. Basah, M.Y.A. (2012). Corporate Socıal Responsıbılıty and Natural Envıronmental Rısk Management in The Context of the Bankıng Sector of Malaysıa, Doctor of Philosophy, Accounting and Finance Section, Cardiff Business School. Birch, D. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: Some Key Theoretical Issues and Concepts for New Ways of Doing Business, Journal of New Business Ideas and Trends, Vol. 1, Iss. 1, pp. 1 – 19. Bowen, Howard R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, University of Iowa Press.
  3. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward The Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholder, Business Horizons, Vol. 34, Iss. 4, pp. 39- 48. Dai, N. T. Ng, A. and Tang, G., (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation in Management Accounting, Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, pp. 1 – 10. Davis, K. (1960). Can Business Afford to Ignore Corporate Social Responsibilities?, California Management Review, Vol. 2, No: 3, pp. 70 - 76. Davis, K. (1973). The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 16, Num. 2, pp. 312 - 322. Davis, K. (1975). Five propositions for social responsibility, Business Horizons, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 19 – 24. Frederick, W. C. (1986). Towards CSR3: Why Ethical Analysis Indispensable and Unavoidable in Corporate Affairs, California Management Review, Vol. 28, Iss. 2, pp. 126 - 141. Frederick, W. C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2: The Maturing of Business and Society Thought, Business and Society, Vol. 33, Num. 2, pp. 150 – 164. Frederick, W. C. (1998). Moving to CSR4. What to Pack for the Trip, Business and Society, Vol. 37, Iss. 1, pp. 40 – 59. Geethamani, S. (2017). Advantages and Disadvantages of Corporate Social Responsibility, International Journal of Applied Research, Vol. 3, Iss. 3, pp. 372 – 374. Jamali, D. and Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context, Journal of Business Ethics, (72): 243–262.
  4. Kanji. R. and Agrawal, R. (2016). Models of Corporate Social Responsibility