Journals / Social Scientific Centered Issues / 2019 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Use of Technology in Measurement and Evaluation: Electronic Portfolios

Pages
37–42
Publication Date
2019-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this way, whether the participants can achieve the related gains and the missing aspects of the training process were examined from a different perspective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The rapid increase of scientific knowledge makes it diffucult to keep pace with.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, the evaluator can reach full and realistic results about the learner .The study was carried out with 48 students with different socio-economic characteristics who participated in the project “I learn about nature by exploring from Microworld to Macroworld in the Ilgaz Mountain National Park- 3, which was realized within the scope of TÜBİTAK 4004 Nature Education and Science schools support program in 2016-2017 academic year. 30 students actively participated in the study and were able to create an electronic portfolio via the flip grid site during the training period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this way, whether the participants can achieve the related gains and the missing aspects of the training process were examined from a different perspective.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Flip grid · technology · measurement and evaluation

Abstract

The rapid increase of scientific knowledge makes it diffucult to keep pace with. At this point, technology has become to guide us. Using technology for our needs and to access scientific knowledege has been adopted by all segments of society. Thus, it is easier to understand the rapidly developing and changing world. One of the areas where technology is effective is education. Technology reshapes both traditional relationships between teachers and students and the educational environment. The use of technology in education comes up with different examples in each part of the lessons. Traditional assessment and evaluation approaches are far from measuring high-level thinking skills. Alternative measurement and assessments are process-based methods which place students on center, help them express their ideas,and allow them to involve actively in all processes of learning. It is a known fact that alternative measurement and assessment techniques are insufficient in Turkey and the world. Technological pedagogical field knowledge research has emphasized the gap in this field in recent years. Portfolios are important tools in a process-oriented assessment. Electronic portfolios offer a lot of convenience for both the learner and the evaluator compared to traditional portfolios. In addition, the evaluator can reach full and realistic results about the learner .The study was carried out with 48 students with different socio-economic characteristics who participated in the project “I learn about nature by exploring from Microworld to Macroworld in the Ilgaz Mountain National Park- 3, which was realized within the scope of TÜBİTAK 4004 Nature Education and Science schools support program in 2016-2017 academic year. 30 students actively participated in the study and were able to create an electronic portfolio via the flip grid site during the training period. The students recorded 60-90 seconds of videos about the education and recorded them in the system. Project practitioners actively evaluated the training process and provided feedback using multimedia environments. In this way, whether the participants can achieve the related gains and the missing aspects of the training process were examined from a different perspective.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAKAR, F., AVAN, Ç. (2019). Use of Technology in Measurement and Evaluation: Electronic Portfolios. Social Scientific Centered Issues, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 37–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/801350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adıgüzel, T., Gürbulak, N., & Sarıçayır, 2011. Akıllı Tahtalar ve Öğretim Uygulamaları, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15). Akkoç, H. (2012). Bilgisayar destekli ölçme-değerlendirme araçlarının matematik öğretimine entegrasyonuna yönelik hizmet öncesi eğitim uygulamaları ve matematik öğretmen adaylarının gelişimi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 3(2). Alkan, C. ve Diğerleri (1995). Eğitim Teknolojisine Giriş. Ankara: Önder Matbaacılık. Ataman; A. (1992). Eğitim Sürecinde Yaratıcılık. (Yayına Hazırlayan: Ayşegül Ataman). Yaratıcılık ve Eğitim, (105-124). Ankara:
  2. Türk Eğitim Derneği, Eğitim Dizisi, (17). Avan, Ç., GÜLGÜN, C., YILMAZ, A., & DOĞANAY, K. (2019). STEM EĞİTİMİNDE OKUL DIŞI ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARI: Kastamonu Bilim Kampı. Journal of STEAM Education, 2(1), 39-51.
  3. Barış, M. F., & Tosun, N. (2013). Sosyal ağ ve e-portfolyo entegrasyonu: Facebook örneği. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 122-129.
  4. Brady, K., Holcomb, B., Smith, B. (2010). The Use of Alternative Social Networking Sites in Higher Educational Settings: A Case Study of the E-Learning Benefits of Ning in Education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, www.ncolr.org/jiol, Volume 9, Number 2, Summer 2010, ISSN: 15414914 Davis, M. H. and Ponnamperuma, G. G. (2005). Portfolio Assessment. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 32(3), 279-284.
  5. Dipace, A. (2009). Evaluatıon of learnıng and e-portfolıo: authentıc assessment ın the experıence of on lıne master. 1st International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 6-8 July, 2009,
  6. Barcelona, Spain. Eren, Yavuz, K. (2005). Aktif Öğrenme Yöntemleri. Ceceli Yayınları,
  7. Ankara.
  8. Graue, M. E. (1993). Integrating theory and practice through instructional assessment. Educational Assessment, 1(4), 283-309.
  9. Gülbahar, Y., Kalelioğlu, F., Madran, O. (2010). Sosyal Ağların Eğitim Amaçlı Kullanımı. 10.11.2017 tarihinde inet-tr.org.tr/inetconf15/ozet/10.html adresinden alınmıştır. Heritage, M. (2007). What Do Teachers Need to Know and Do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89 (2), 140 – 145. Hodges W.J., Lamb P., Brown M.H. & Foy D.S. (2005),
  10. Assessment For All, Science Scope, January, 43-44.
  11. Höçük, S. (2012). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin elektronik portfolyoların kullanımı ile ilgili görüşleri. IV. Uluslararası Türkiye Eğitim Araştırmaları Kongresi, 4-7 Mayıs 2012, İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
  12. Karamustafaoğlu, S., Çağlak, A., & Meşeci, B. (2012). Alternatif Ölçme Değerlendirme Ar