Journals / Researcher / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Is it the speaker's formant, actor's formant, shouting formant or calling formant cluster?: A proposal for a more proper name/concept

Journal
Researcher
Pages
368–377
Publication Date
2017-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It concluded that, to call the given acoustical phenomenon as the 3-4 kHz peak P3-4kHz may be as simple as it is correct, too

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Appropriateness of concepts is a trouble of social and natural scientists.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study examined the drawbacks of calling the 3-4 kHz spectral energy peak with different names; speaker’s formant, actor’s formant, shouting formant and calling formant cluster.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It concluded that, to call the given acoustical phenomenon as the 3-4 kHz peak P3-4kHz may be as simple as it is correct, too
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:P3-4kHz Speaker’s Formant Actor’s Formant Shouting Formant Conceptualization

Abstract

Appropriateness of concepts is a trouble of social and natural scientists. The main problem was created generally by conceptual stretching or assigning different names to the same thing that created an abundance of concepts that have potential to cause unnecessary complexity and uncertainty in the literature. The present study examined the drawbacks of calling the 3-4 kHz spectral energy peak with different names; speaker’s formant, actor’s formant, shouting formant and calling formant cluster. It concluded that, to call the given acoustical phenomenon as the 3-4 kHz peak P3-4kHz may be as simple as it is correct, too

Özet

Kavramların yerindeliği hususu bilim insanları açısından önemli bir sorundur. Sorunu üreten temel etmenin, söz konusu bir kavramın zorlama bir şekilde genişletilmesi veya aynı bulguya/şeye, literatürde gereksiz bir kavramsal karmaşa ve belirsizlik yaratma potansiyeli üretecek şekilde, farklı isimler verilmesi olduğu görülür. Bu çalışmada, spektral olarak 3-4 kHz bölgede görülen enerji sıçramasının konuşmacı formantı, aktör formantı, haykırma formantı ve çağırma formant demeti gibi farklı isimlerle anılmasının sakıncaları ele alınmıştır. Söz konusu akustik kavramsallaştırılmasının, basit ve bir o kadar da doğru olacağı sonucuna varılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

SARUHAN, Ş. (2017). Is it the speaker's formant, actor's formant, shouting formant or calling formant cluster?: A proposal for a more proper name/concept. Researcher, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 368–377. https://ajindex.com/articles/797559

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Austin S. F. (2005). Treasure “Chest”: A Physiological and Pedagogical Review of the Lower Mechanism. Journal of Singing, 61(3), 241-251.
  2. Bele I. V. (2006). The Speaker’s Formant. J Voice, 20(4): 555-578. Boersma P. & Kovačić G. (2006). Spectral characteristics of three styles of Croatian folk singing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1805-1816. Borch D.Z. & Sundberg J. (2002). Spectral distribution of solo voice and accompaniment in pop music. TMH-QPSR, 43(1), 31-35. Buller J. & Gamble A. (2002). Conceptualizing Europeanization. Public Policy and Administration, 17(2), 4-24.
  3. Castellengo M. (2005). Manuel Garcia Jr: A clear-sighted observer of human voice production. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 30(3), 163-170. Cleveland T. F. Sundberg J. & Stone R. E. (2001). Long term-average spectrum characteristics of country singers during speaking and singing. J Voice, 15(1), 54-60. Dong L. Kong J. & Sundberg J. (2014). Long-Term-Average Spectrum Characteristics of Kunqu Opera Singers' Speaking, Singing and Stage Speech. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 39(2), 72-80.
  4. Gerring J. (1999). What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity, 31(3), 357-393. Harling M. & Sundberg P. (1998). Taxonomy and Philosophy of Names. Biology and Philosophy, 13, 233-244.
  5. Henrich N. (2006). Mirroring the voice from Garcia to the present day: Some insights into singing voice registers. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology., 31(1), 3-14. Henrich N. Roubeau B. & Castellengo M. (2003). On the use of electroglottography for characterization of the laryngeal mechanisms. In: Proceedings of Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference (SMAC 03), Stockholm, Sweden. Hunter E. J. & Titze I. R. (2005). Overlap of hearing and voicing ranges in singing. Journal of Singing, 61(4), 387-392. Jordan G. Halpin D. & Maloney W. (2004). Defining Interests: Disambiguation and the Need for New Distinctions? BJPIR, 6, 195-212. Kovačić G. Boersma P. & Domitrevic H. (2003). Long-Term Average Spectra in Professional Folk Singing Voices: A Comparison of the Klapa and Dozivački Styles. Institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Proceedings, 25, 53–64.
  6. Kurt Y. (2012). Kur’ân’ın Korunmasında Hâfızlık Müessesesi. Hitit Univ. İlahiyat Fakül. Derg., 11,229–251.
  7. Lamesch S. Expert R, Castellengo M. Henrich N & Chuberre B. (2007). Investigating voix mixte: A scientific challenge towards a renewed vocal pedagogy. CIM07 proceeding