SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Quantrade Journal of Complex Systems in Social Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Survey System Using Blockchain for Scientific Research

Salim Eray ÇELİK
Vildan ÖZKIR
Pages
45–67
Publication Date
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, we use the technology organization environment (TOE) theory to identify barriers that may arise in technology adoption and use the Fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Laboratory Evaluation (Fuzzy Dematel) method to evaluate, analyze and prioritize the interactions of these barriers with each other.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The survey is a list of questions prepared according to a specific plan for the resource people who constitute a universe or sample to understand specific people's feelings, thoughts, and experiences on a subject.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, there are many disadvantages such as lack of transparency, lack of participant privacy, and low level of security due to the centralized structure of existing survey systems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, we use the technology organization environment (TOE) theory to identify barriers that may arise in technology adoption and use the Fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Laboratory Evaluation (Fuzzy Dematel) method to evaluate, analyze and prioritize the interactions of these barriers with each other.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Blockchain · Survey System · Fuzzy Dematel

Abstract

The survey is a list of questions prepared according to a specific plan for the resource people who constitute a universe or sample to understand specific people's feelings, thoughts, and experiences on a subject. However, there are many disadvantages such as lack of transparency, lack of participant privacy, and low level of security due to the centralized structure of existing survey systems. Blockchain is a Digital Trust Protocol that provides agentless, transparent, secure information transfer that protects user privacy with crypto encryption. In this study, we propose a blockchain-based, inter-university survey system to be used in scientific research to solve the problems encountered in existing survey systems. We also do a SWOT analysis of our proposed approach and centralized survey systems, utilize an algorithm in the literature to investigate whether blockchain is suitable for survey applications, compare the central survey systems with the design we propose in terms of transparency using the CNN transparency index. Moreover, we use the technology organization environment (TOE) theory to identify barriers that may arise in technology adoption and use the Fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Laboratory Evaluation (Fuzzy Dematel) method to evaluate, analyze and prioritize the interactions of these barriers with each other.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, S. E., ÖZKIR, V. (2021). Survey System Using Blockchain for Scientific Research. Quantrade Journal of Complex Systems in Social Sciences, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 45–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/796912

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Ahmad, M. and Salah, K. (2018) “IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges,” Future Generation Computer Systems, 82, pp. 395–411. doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.11.022. Aitzhan, N.Z. and Svetinovic, D. (2018) “Security and Privacy in Decentralized Energy Trading Through Multi-Signatures, Blockchain and Anonymous Messaging Streams,” 15(5), pp. 840–852.
  2. Andoni, M. et al. (2019) “Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 100(November 2018), pp. 143–174. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.014. Androulaki, E. et al. (no date) “Hyperledger Fabric: A Distributed Operating System for Permissioned Blockchains.” AYDAŞ, İ. (2020) “PRE-ELECTION POLLS IN TURKEY,” 3(2017), pp. 54–67.
  3. Azaria, A. et al. (2016) “MedRec: Using blockchain for medical data access and permission management,” Proceedings - 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data, OBD 2016, pp. 25–30. doi:10.1109/OBD.2016.11. B, C.D. et al. (2015) “Making Bitcoin Exchanges Transparent,” pp. 561–576. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24177-7.
  4. Baur, A.W. et al. (2015) “Cryptocurrencies as a Disruption ? Empirical Findings on User Adoption and Future Potential of Bitcoin and Co,” pp. 63–80. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25013-7.
  5. Bhargavan, K. et al. (no date) “Formal Verification of Smart Contracts Short Paper F *,” pp. 91–96.
  6. Biswas, B. and Gupta, R. (2019) “Computers & Industrial Engineering Analysis of barriers to implement blockchain in industry and service sectors,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136(July), pp. 225–241. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.005. Biswas, K. and Technology, A.B. (2016) “Securing Smart Cities Using Blockchain Technology,” pp. 10–11. doi:10.1109/HPCC-SmartCity-DSS.2016.178. “Blockchain’s Roles in Meeting Key Supply Chain Management Objectives By: Nir Kshetri Kshetri, Nir (2018)." Blockchain’s Roles in Meeting Key Supply Chain Management Objectives,”” (2018), pp. 80–89. “Blockchain’s roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy By: Nir Kshetri Kshetri, Nir (2017)."Blockchain’s roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy "” (2017), 41, pp. 1027–1038.
  7. Bruens, B. and Moehrle, M.G. (2018) “Understanding the diffusion of the blockchain technology: A patent-based analysis using the tf-lag-idf for term novelty evaluation,” PICMET 2018 - Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology: Managing Technological Entrepreneurship: The E