Journals / PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs / 2016 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Understanding Turkey’s Emerging “Civilian” Foreign Policy Role in the 2000s through Development Cooperation in the Africa Region

Pages
67–100
Publication Date
2016-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally the paper will question whether this specific development cooperation policy has so far been successful in constructing a credible “civilian foreign policy role” for Turkey in the Africa region

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper attempts to understand the gradual “civilian” shift in Turkish foreign policy in the first decade of the 2000s through its development cooperation activities in the Africa region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this aim, by applying the “civilian power” role concept developed by François Duchêne, it first investigates how Turkey’s 1 domestic democratic and economic preconditions, 2 normative commitments, and 3 power instruments evolved throughout history to make it possible to talk about an emerging “civilian role” in Turkish foreign policy during the first decade of the 2000s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally the paper will question whether this specific development cooperation policy has so far been successful in constructing a credible “civilian foreign policy role” for Turkey in the Africa region
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Turkish Foreign Policy · Civilian Power · Civilian Foreign Policy Role

Abstract

This paper attempts to understand the gradual “civilian” shift in Turkish foreign policy in the first decade of the 2000s through its development cooperation activities in the Africa region. To this aim, by applying the “civilian power” role concept developed by François Duchêne, it first investigates how Turkey’s 1 domestic democratic and economic preconditions, 2 normative commitments, and 3 power instruments evolved throughout history to make it possible to talk about an emerging “civilian role” in Turkish foreign policy during the first decade of the 2000s. Then it looks more closely at Turkey’s civilian foreign policy practice through the “development cooperation” activities of the Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency TİKA across Africa and specifically in Somalia throughout the 2000s. Finally the paper will question whether this specific development cooperation policy has so far been successful in constructing a credible “civilian foreign policy role” for Turkey in the Africa region

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖK, G. O., DAL, E. P. (2016). Understanding Turkey’s Emerging “Civilian” Foreign Policy Role in the 2000s through Development Cooperation in the Africa Region. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 67–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/795694

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. 1 Tarık Oğuzlu, “Soft Power in Turkish Foreign Policy”, Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 61, No. 1 (2007), pp.81-97; Eleni Fotiou and Dimitrios Triantaphyllou, “Assessing Turkey’s “Soft Power” Role: Rhetoric versus Practice”, The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 45, No. 1 (2010), pp. 99-113. 2 Emel Parlar Dal, “Assessing Turkey’s “Normative” Power in the Middle East and North Africa Region: New Dynamics and their Limitations”, Turkish Studies Vol. 14, No. 4 (2013), pp.709-734. 3 Ziya Öniş and Mustafa Kutlay, “Rising Powers in a Changing Global Order: the political economy of Turkey in the age of Brics”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 8 (2013), pp. 1409-1426. Tarık Oğuzlu, “Making Sense of Turkey’s Rising Power Status: What Does Turkey’s Approach within NATO Tell Us?” Turkish Studies, Vol. 14, No. 4 (2013), pp. 774-796; Tarık Oğuzlu and Emel Dal Parlar, “Decoding Turkey’s Rise: An Introduction”, Turkish Studies, Vol.14, No. 4 (2013), pp. 617-636. 4 Şaban Kardaş, “Turkey: A Regional Power Facing a Changing International System”, Turkish Studies, Vol.14, No.4 (2013), pp. 637-660. 5 Gökhan Bacik, and Isa Afacan, “Turkey Discovers Sub-Saharan Africa: The Critical Role of Agents in the Construction of Turkish Foreign-Policy Discourse”, Turkish Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3 (2013), pp. 483-502. Mehmet Özkan and Birol Akgün, “Turkey’s Opening to Africa”, Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 48, No. 4 (2010), pp. 525– 546. Mehmet Ozkan and Serhat Orakçı, “Viewpoint: Turkey as a “Political” Actor in Africa – An Assessment of Turkish Involvement in Somalia”, Journal of Eastern African Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2 (2015), pp. 1-10. 6 Karen E. Smith, “Beyond the Civilian Power Debate”, Politique Europeénne Vol. 1, No. 17 (2005), pp. 63-82. 7 See François Duchene, “The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence” in Max Kohnstamm and Wolfgang Hager (eds.), A Nation Writ Large? Foreign-Policy Problems before the European Community, London, Macmillan, 1973, pp. 1-21. 8 See Sebastian Harnisch, and Hanns W Maull, Germany as a Civilian Power, the Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic, Manchester, Manchester Uni. Press, 2001.
  2. Jonas, Wolff, “Democracy Promotion and Civilian Power: The Example of Germany’s ‘ValueOriented’ Foreign Policy”, German Politics, Vol. 22, No. 4 (2013), pp. 477-493. Silvia Dutrénit Bielous, “Civilian Power, Military Power and Human Rights in Recent Uruguay History”, Canadian Journal of