Journals / PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs / 2017 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

A Quarter-Century Pursuit of Independence: Politics of Trade, Energy, and Economic Development in Uzbekistan

Pages
49–90
Publication Date
2017-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is a matter of policy choices to translate this promising outlook into solid and sustainable economic growth

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Uzbekistan chose an original path of economic development policy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper divides the post-independence economic policies of the Uzbek leadership into three periods according to various definitive characteristics, and argues that the original path of the Uzbek model has been one of the key factors for the performance of the Uzbek economy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is a matter of policy choices to translate this promising outlook into solid and sustainable economic growth
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Uzbekistan · Economy · Political Economy

Abstract

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Uzbekistan chose an original path of economic development policy. Known as the Uzbek model, these policies helped the Uzbek economy survive at least two economic crises over the last two decades. In terms of various macroeconomic indicators, the Uzbek economy outperformed similar countries. This paper divides the post-independence economic policies of the Uzbek leadership into three periods according to various definitive characteristics, and argues that the original path of the Uzbek model has been one of the key factors for the performance of the Uzbek economy. Over the last 25 years, the main motivation behind the occasional changes in the political and economic preferences of the Uzbek leadership has been the pursuit of independence.In its quarter century of economic policies, Uzbekistan’s economy has achieved considerable success and has had various opportunities. It is a matter of policy choices to translate this promising outlook into solid and sustainable economic growth

🔖

Cite This Article

SAKAL, H. B. (2017). A Quarter-Century Pursuit of Independence: Politics of Trade, Energy, and Economic Development in Uzbekistan. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 49–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/795668

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Bernardo Teles Fazendeiro, “Keeping Face in the Public Sphere: Recognition, Discretion and Uzbekistan’s Relations with the United States and Germany, 1991- 2006”,
  2. Central Asian Survey, Vol. 34, No. 3 (2015), pp. 341-356; “Uzbekistan - Foreign Relations””, Global Security, http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/centralasia/uzbek-forrel. htm (last visited 31 December 2016). For an attempt of periodization of Uzbek politics, see, Durbek Sayfullayev, “Uzbekistan’s Diplomacy in the Modern International Relations System”,Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 16, No. 4 (2016), pp. 415- 422; For another early example of periodization of Uzbek example based on the performance of economic reforms, see,Richard Pomfret, “The Uzbek Model of Economic Development, 1991-1999”,Economics of Transition, Vol. 8, No. 3 (2000), pp. 733-748. Robert Lewis, “Early Irrigation in West Turkestan”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 56, No. 3 (1966), p. 479. See, for an example: Sir Mandeville, The Voiage and Travaile of Sir John Maundevile, Kt, London, Edward Lumley, (1839 reproduction ofthe 1725 version), pp. 263-64. Ian Matley, “The Golodnaya Steppe: A Russian Irrigation Venture in Central Asia”,Geographical Review, Vol. 60, No. 3 (1970), pp. 328-29.
  3. Kn. Massalskiy, Khlopkovoye Delo v Srednei Azii i Ego Buduschee (Cotton Industry in Central Asia and Its Future), S.Peterburg, B. Kirschbaum, 1892, pp. 15-17. Matley, “The Golodnaya Steppe”, p.329; Massalskiy, Khlopkovoye Delo v Srednei Azii i Ego Buduschee, p. 15. John Whitman, “Turkestan Cotton in Imperial Russia”,American Slavic and East European Review, Vol. 15, No. 2 (1956), p. 194. Igor Lipovsky, “The Central Asian Cotton Epic”,Central Asian Survey, Vol. 14, No. 4 (1995), p. 533. The total demand was 1.87 million bales. See, Michael, Cotton Growing in the Soviet Union, p. 3. For cotton agriculture and irrigation in Central Asia during and before Soviet era, see M. Bennett, “Food and Agriculture in the Soviet Union, 1917-48”,Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 57, No. 3 (1949), pp. 185-198; George Cressey, “Changing the Map of the Soviet Union”,Economic Geography, Vol. 29, No. 3(1953), pp. 198-207; A. A. Grigoryev, “Soviet Plans for Irrigation and Power: A Geographical Assessment”,The Geographical Journal, Vol. 118, No. 2 (1952), pp. 168-179; Lipovsky, “The Central Asian Cotton Epic”. Zvi Lerman, Yoav Kislev, David Biton and Alon Kriss, “Agricultural Output and Productivity in the Former Soviet Republics”, Econ