Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Green Public Procurement as an Environmental Policy Instrument in the European Union

AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NDE ÇEVRE POLİTİKASI ARACI OLARAK YEŞİL KAMU ALIMLARI

Pages
85–119
Publication Date
2020-07-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Compared to other environmental policy instruments green public procurement is applied in a limited number of countries, it affects only a slight portion of the market, instead of producers decisions are made by consumers, and it promotes the use of ecological innovation and technologies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Green public procurements are accepted as a policy instrument in the European Union (EU) in order to enhance the environmental sustainability of the markets.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study aims to determine the differences between the green public procurement and other environmental policy instruments in the EU and to reveal its relationship with other environmental policy instruments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Compared to other environmental policy instruments green public procurement is applied in a limited number of countries, it affects only a slight portion of the market, instead of producers decisions are made by consumers, and it promotes the use of ecological innovation and technologies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Green Public Procurement · Environmental Policy · European Union

Abstract

Green public procurements are accepted as a policy instrument in the European Union (EU) in order to enhance the environmental sustainability of the markets. The study aims to determine the differences between the green public procurement and other environmental policy instruments in the EU and to reveal its relationship with other environmental policy instruments. In the study, in line with the aim, EU common environmental policy and its instruments are examined in terms of green public. Compared to other environmental policy instruments green public procurement is applied in a limited number of countries, it affects only a slight portion of the market, instead of producers decisions are made by consumers, and it promotes the use of ecological innovation and technologies.

Özet

Piyasaların çevresel sürdürülebilirliğini artırabilmek için Avrupa Birliği’nde (AB) yeşil kamu alımları bir politika aracı olarak kabul edilmektedir. Çalışma AB’de yeşil kamu alımlarının diğer çevre politikası araçlarından farklılıklarını tespit etmeyi ve diğer çevre politikası araçları ile olan ilişkisini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaç kapsamında çalışmada yeşil kamu alımları özelinde AB ortak çevre politikası ve araçları incelenmiştir. Yeşil kamu alımları diğer çevre politikası araçlarına kıyasla daha sınırlı sayıda ülkede uygulanmakta, ilgili piyasanın küçük bir kısmını etkilemekte, kararlar üreticiler yerine tüketiciler tarafından verilmekte, ekolojik inovasyonu ve teknolojilerin kullanımını teşvik etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİKMEN, S., ŞANLI, İ. D. (2020). Green Public Procurement as an Environmental Policy Instrument in the European Union. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 85–119. https://ajindex.com/articles/79396

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ahsan, Kamrul, ve Shams Rahman. “Green Public Procurement Implementation Challenges in Australian Public Healthcare Sector”. Journal of Cleaner Production 152 (2017): 181–97.
  2. Akenji, Lewis. “Consumer Scapegoatism and Limits to Green Consumerism”. Journal of Cleaner Production 63 (2014): 13–23.
  3. Aldenius, Malin, ve Jamil Khan. “Strategic Use of Green Public Procurement in the Bus Sector: Challenges and Opportunities”. Journal of Cleaner Production 164 (2017): 250–57.
  4. Alejandre, Eider, Andrea Traspaderne, ve Alberto Ortiz de Elgea. “Best Practice on Green or Sustainable Public Procurement and New Guidelines”, 2010.
  5. Annik, Fet, Michelsen Ottar, ve Boer Luitzen. “Green Public Procurement in Practice — The case of Norway”. Society and Economy 33, sayı 1 (2011): 183–98.
  6. Avrupa Birliği Başkanlığı. “Fasıl 27 - Çevre”, 2018. https://www.ab.gov.tr/92.html.
  7. Barde, Jean-Philippe. “Economic Instruments in Environmental Policy: Lessons from OECD Experience and their relevance to Developing Economies”, 1994.
  8. Bauer, Bjørn, Jens Christensen, Karen Christensen, Tue Dyekjær-Hansen, ve Ida Bode. Benefits of Green Public Procurement. Copenhagen: TemaNord, 2009.
  9. Bohm, Peter, ve Clifford S. Russell. “Comparative Analysis of Alternative Policy Instruments”. Içinde Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, editör A. V. Kneese ve J. L. Sweeney, 1:395–460. Elsevier, 1985.
  10. Callan, Scott J., ve Janet M. Thomas. Environmental Economics & Management: Theory, Policy, and Applications. 6. Edition.
  11. Mason, Ohio: South-Western, Cengage Learning, 2013.
  12. Cerutti, Alessandro K., Simone Contu, Fulvio Ardente, Dario Donno, ve Gabriele L. Beccaro. “Carbon Footprint in Green Public Procurement: Policy Evaluation from a Case Study in the Food Sector”. Food Policy 58 (2016): 82–93.
  13. Czarnezki, Jason J. “Green Public Procurement, Legal Instruments for Promoting Environmental Interests in the United States and European Union”. Uppsala University, 2019.
  14. Danilina, Vera, ve Federico Trionfet. “Green Public Procurement v.s. Environmental Taxation: implications for the EU-MENA environmental policy”, 2019. https://planbleu.org/sites/default/files/publications/femise_medbrief_16.pdf.
  15. Day, Catherine. “Buying Green: The Crucial Role of Public Authorities”. Local Environment 10, sayı 2 (2005): 201–9. Decision 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013), OJ L 310 of November 9, 2006 (y.y.). Donate