Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2007 / Sayı: 153

The role of international organizations in fight against corruption

Yolsuzlukla mücadelede uluslararası kuruluşların rolü

Pages
74–101
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within these framework in this study, the efforts of international organizations that combat corruption will be discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Even though there has been no a description of corruption that all scholars has agreed, in broad terms, corruption may be defined as the abuse of public office for private gain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It encompasses unilateral abuses by government officials such as embezzlement and nepotism, as well as abuses linking public and private actors such as bribery, and fraud.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within these framework in this study, the efforts of international organizations that combat corruption will be discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Even though there has been no a description of corruption that all scholars has agreed, in broad terms, corruption may be defined as the abuse of public office for private gain. It encompasses unilateral abuses by government officials such as embezzlement and nepotism, as well as abuses linking public and private actors such as bribery, and fraud. Besides, corruption arises in both political and bureaucratic offices and can be petty or grand, organized or unorganized. Thus, it has become an issue of major political and economic significance especially in recent years and the necessity to take measures against it has become evident both by states and by international organizations. Within these framework in this study, the efforts of international organizations that combat corruption will be discussed.

Özet

Her ne kadar üzerinde tüm akademisyenlerin hemfikir olduğu bir yolsuzluk tanımı bulunmasa da, genel anlamda yolsuzluk bir kamu otoritesinin kişisel çıkar elde etmek için kötüye kullanılması olarak tanımlanabilir. Yolsuzluk; zimmet, nepotizm gibi kamu görevlilerinin yaptıkları tek taraflı eylemler yanında özel ve kamusal aktörlerle bağlantılı rüşvet, dolandırıcılık gibi kavramları da bünyesinde barındırmaktadır. Bunun yanı sıra yolsuzluk, küçük ya da büyük çaplı olmak üzere politik ve bürokratik alanlarda hem bireysel hem de organize şekillerde ortaya çıkabilmektedir. Bu nedenle, özellikle son yıllarda ekonomik ve politik öneme sahip olan bir sorun olarak hem devletlerin hem de uluslararası örgütlerin önlem alması gereken bir sorun olarak görülmektedir. Bu çerçevede, çalışmamızda yolsuzlukla savaşan uluslararası örgütlere yer verilecek ve yolsuzlukla mücadeleye bu kuruluşların düzenlemeler yoluyla yaptıkları katkılar üzerinde durulacaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKAŞ, M., ÇAK, M. (2007). The role of international organizations in fight against corruption. Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 153, 74–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/79140

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ackerman S. R. (1978), Corruption: A Study in Political Economy, New York Academic Press, p. 9
  2. Ackerman S. R. (1999), Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequnces and Reform, New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 91-111
  3. Anand S., & Knack, S. & Young, L.& Azfar, O. (2001),"Gender and corruption," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pp.25-55, February
  4. Barrett, P.,(1999) “Auditing in Contemporary Public Administration”, Public Seminar Series, The Australian National University, 17 May 1999
  5. Boadi E. G.; Conflict of Interest Nepotism and Cronyism, www.transparency.org/sourcebook/21.pdf, 01/03/2007
  6. Buchanan J., Tollıson R. and Tullock G.; (1980), Toward a Theory of the Rent Seeking Society, College Station, Texas A&M University Pres, p.9
  7. Commission of The European Communities, The European Parliament and The European Economic and Socıal Committee on a Comprehensive EU Policy Against Corruption, Ten Principles for Improving The Fight Against Corruption in Acceding, Candidate and Other Third Countries, Com(2003) 317 final, Brussels, 28.5.2003
  8. Ferrell O. C., Fraedrıch J., and Ferrell L.; (2002), Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases, New York, Houghton Mifflin Company
  9. Fısher L., (2002), “A Dose of Law and Realism for Presidential Studies”, Presidential Studies Quarterly, Volume 32, No 4, p. 686. 10.Fredrıch C. J.; (1966), “Political Pathology”, The Political Quarterly, Volume 37, p.74. 11.Hürcan, Y., Kızıltaş,E.,Yılmaz, H., (2000), “Türk Kamu Mali yönetimi Mali Saydamlık Standartlarının Neresinde –IMF iyi uygulamalar Tüzüğü Temelinde Bir Değerlendirme “, Kamu Maliyesinde Saydamlık, TESEV, İstanbul, s.99-135. 12.Kayrak, M., (2006), “Yolsuzlukla Mücadelede Uluslar arası Örgütler”, SosyoEkonomi, Sayı:2, Ankara,.ss.85-107. 13.Keefer P.; (2003), Democratization and Clientelism: Why are Young Democracies Badly Governed?, The World Bank Publication, p. 5. 14.Khan M. H.; “A Typology of Corrupt Transactions in Developing Countries”, IDS Bulletin, Volume 27, No 2, pp. 12-21. 15.Korkmaz, E. vd. (2001), Türkiye’de Yolsuzluğun Sosyo-Ekonomik Nedenleri, Etkileri ve Çözüm Önerileri, İTO Yayınları, Yayın No.35, İstanbul. 16.Mahon, L. M., (2005), EU Anti-Corruption Policy and 10 Principles for Candidate Countries, Conference on Anti-Corruption, Ankara, Turkey 7-8 July. 17.Moussis, N., (1993) Access to Europe, Guide to Community Policies, 3 rd revised Edition. 18.NAO (National Audit Office) (2000), Finance Au