Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2010 / Sayı: 159

The reforms on the corporation income tax caused by globalization and an evaluating on member of OECD

Globalleşmenin neden olduğu kurumlar vergisi reformları ve OECD üyesi ülkeler üzerine bir değerlendirme

Pages
36–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this sense, the purpose of the study is to examine reasons and results of the reforms on the corporation income taxes based on the data of Deveruex (2002) and Lortetz (2008).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Most of OECD countries have been implemented some important reforms related to corporation income taxes in the last three decades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Statutory corporate tax rates have fallen from average of 48% in the early 1980s to 25% by the end of 2000s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this sense, the purpose of the study is to examine reasons and results of the reforms on the corporation income taxes based on the data of Deveruex (2002) and Lortetz (2008).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Most of OECD countries have been implemented some important reforms related to corporation income taxes in the last three decades. Statutory corporate tax rates have fallen from average of 48% in the early 1980s to 25% by the end of 2000s. Policy maker have worried about this decreasing on the tax because, this could cause some loss of revenue. However the data about GDP show that the rate of the corporate tax revenues in the GDP and total tax revenues has raised among 1982 to 2005. Therefore it could say that changes in tax revenue depend on not only tax rates but also tax base. In this sense, the purpose of the study is to examine reasons and results of the reforms on the corporation income taxes based on the data of Deveruex (2002) and Lortetz (2008).

Özet

Son otuz yılda OECD üyesi ülkelerin çoğunda önemli reformlar yapılmış ve 1980’li yılların başlarında %48 olan yasal kurumlar vergisi oranları 2000’li yılların sonlarında %25’e kadar gerilemiştir. Politikacılar kurumlar vergisi oranlarındaki bu dibe doğru baskının gelir kaybına yol açacağından endişe duymaktadırlar. Ancak veriler tam aksine 1982-2005 yılları arasında kurumlar vergisi gelirlerinin GSYİH ve toplam vergi gelirleri içerisindeki oranının arttığını göstermiştir. Dolayısıyla vergi gelirlerindeki değişim sadece vergi oranındaki değişmeye değil, vergi matrahına da bağlıdır. Bu çalışmada, temel kurumlar vergisi reformlarının (kurumlar vergisi oranlarındaki düşüşün ve kurumlar vergisi matrahındaki genişlemenin) nedenleri ve sonuçları araştırılmakta ve özellikle Devereux (2002) ve Loretz (2008) tarafından yapılan araştırmaların verilerinden yararlanılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİNKAYA, A. (2010). The reforms on the corporation income tax caused by globalization and an evaluating on member of OECD. Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 159, 36–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/79067

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2001), “Globalization and Tax Competition: Implications for Developing Countries”, http://www.fiscalreform.net/library/pdfs/global_tax_ competition.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 26/10/2010)
  2. Bretschger, L. ve Hettich, F. (2002), “Globalization, Capital Mobility and Tax Competition: Theory and Evidence for OECD Countries”, European Journal of Political Economy, 18, 695-716.
  3. Clausing, K. A. (2007), “Corporate Tax Revenues in OECD Countries”, International Tax Public Finance, 14, 115-133.
  4. Devereux, M., Griffith, P. R. ve Alexander, K. (2002), “Corporate Income Tax Reforms and International Tax Competition”, Economic Policy, 17(35), 449- 495. Devereux, M. P. (2008), “Business Taxation in a Globalized World”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24 (4), 625-638.
  5. Diehl, K. A. (2009), “Reversion to the Mean: The Interaction Between GDP and Corporate Tax Rates in the Member Countries of the European Union”, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 16, 31-36.
  6. Edizdoğan, N. ve Ali, Ç. (2010),
  7. Vergilerin Ekonomik Analizi, Dora Yayıncılık, Bursa. Fuest, C. (2008), The European Commission’s Proposal for a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24 (4), 720-739.
  8. Gomes, P. ve Pouget, F. (2008), “Corporate Tax Competition and the Decline of Public Investment”, European Central Bank, Working Paper Series No.928, http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp928.pdf (Erişim Tarihi:28/10/2010) http://www.gib.gov.tr/fileadmin/user_upload/VI/CVI/Tablo_57.xls.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 10/12/2010) http://www.gib.gov.tr/fileadmin/HTML/VI/OECD/Tablo_12.xls.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 10/12/2010)
  9. OECD (2007), “Tax Policy Studies Fundamental Reform of Corporate Income Tax”, No.16. http://www.oecdilibrary.org/docserver/download/fulltext/2307061e. pdf?expires=1287407351&id=0000&accname=ocid56027450&checksum=F7 9816A8A1374006B01D28E0AC1F4903 (Erişim Tarihi: 18/10/2010).
  10. KPMG (2010), KPMG’s Corporate and Indirect Tax Survey 2010, http://www. kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Pages/2010- Global-Corporate-and-Indirect-Tax-Survey.aspx (Erişim Tarihi: 21/10/2010)
  11. Loretz, S. (2008), “Corporate Taxation in the OECD in a Wider Context”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(4), 639-660.
  12. McCarthya, K., van Doornb, F. ve Ungerb, B. (2008), “Globalization, Tax Competition and the Harmonization of Corporate Tax Rates in Europe: A Case of Killing the Patient to Cure the Disease?”, Utrecht School of Economics, Tjalling, C. Koopmans