Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2012 / Sayı: 162

Organizational commitment of public employees: A comparative study

Kamu çalışanlarının örgütsel bağlılığı: Karşılaştırmalı bir çalışma

Pages
266–281
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this research is to determine organizational commitment of the doctors and nurses working at Faculty of Medicine in Selcuk University in comparative way.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Organizational commitment refers to one’s acceptation of goals and values of the institutional and his efforts to achieve its objectives and desire to maintain his membership in the institution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Having significiant benefits for the employees and organizational, organizational commitment may be grouped in three types: emotional (affective), continuous (continuance) and normative.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this research is to determine organizational commitment of the doctors and nurses working at Faculty of Medicine in Selcuk University in comparative way.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Organizational commitment refers to one’s acceptation of goals and values of the institutional and his efforts to achieve its objectives and desire to maintain his membership in the institution. Having significiant benefits for the employees and organizational, organizational commitment may be grouped in three types: emotional (affective), continuous (continuance) and normative. The aim of this research is to determine organizational commitment of the doctors and nurses working at Faculty of Medicine in Selcuk University in comparative way.

Özet

Örgütsel bağlılık, bireyin örgütsel amaç ve değerleri kabul etmesi, bu amaçlara ulaşılması yönünde çaba sarf etmesi ve örgüt üyeliğini devam ettirme isteğidir. Hem örgüt hem de çalışanlar bağlamında önemli yararları bulunan örgütsel bağlılığın duygusal (affective), sürekli (continuance) ve normatif (normative) olmak üzere üç türü bulunmaktadır. Araştırmanın amacı Selçuk Üniversitesi Meram Tıp Fakültesi hastanesinde çalışan hemşire ve doktorların örgütsel bağlılıklarını karşılaştırmalı olarak ortaya koymaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEVİNÇ, İ., ŞAHİN, A. (2012). Organizational commitment of public employees: A comparative study. Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 162, 266–281. https://ajindex.com/articles/79031

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Allen, N.J. ve Meyer, J.P. (1990), The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  2. Allen, N.J. ve Grisaffe, D.B. (2001), Employee Commitment to the Organization and Customer Reactions: Mapping the Linkages, Human Resource Management Review, 11, 209-236.
  3. Becker, T.E. (1992), Foci and Bases of Commitment: Are They Distinctions Worth Making, Academy of Management Journal, 35, 232–244.
  4. Boylu, Y., Pelit, E. ve Güçer, E. (2007), “Akademisyenlerin Örgütsel Bağlılık Düzeyleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 44(511), 55–74.
  5. Brown, B.B. (2003), Employees` Organizational Commitment and Their Perception of Supervisors` Relations-Oriented and Task-Oriented Leadership Behaviors, Dissertation, Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/Employees` Organizational Commitment and Their Perception of Burgess, R. ve Turner, S. (2000), Seven Key Features for Creating and Sustaining Commitment, International Journal of Project Management, 18, 225-233.
  6. Chen, Z.X. ve Francesco, A.M. (2003), “The Relationship between the Three Components of Commitment and Employee Performance in China”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(3), 490-516.
  7. Çakır, B. (2006), “SA 8000 Sosyal Sorumluluk Standardının Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İş Doyumuna Olan Etkileri”, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Toplam Kalite Yönetimi Anabilim Dalı, İzmir.
  8. Durna, U. ve Eren, V. (2005), Üç Bağlılık Unsuru Ekseninde Örgütsel Bağlılık, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 6(2), 210–219.
  9. Hoxley M. (2000), Measuring UK Construction Professional Service Quality: What, How, When and Who, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17, 511–526.
  10. Lyons, S., Duxbury, L.E. ve Higgins, C.A. (2006), “A Comparison of the Values and Commitment of Private Sector, Public Sector and Parapublic Sector Employees”, Public Administration Review, 66 (4), 605-618.
  11. Mathıeu, J.E. ve Zajac, D.M. (1990), A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of Organizational Commitment, Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
  12. Meyer, J.P. ve Allen, N.J. (1991), “A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment, Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.
  13. Meyer, J.P. ve Allen, N.J. (1997), Commitment in the Workplace: Theory Research and Application, London, Sa