Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2012 / Sayı: 163

Exchange rate and IMKB100 index relationship: A new test

Döviz kuru ve İMKB100 endeksi ilişkisi: Yeni bir test

Pages
243–257
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the three tests show that there is a “negative” relationship between two variables and therefore, portfolio balance approach is supported.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are two approaches for the relationship between exchange rates and stock prices including "traditional" and "portfolio balance" approaches.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to traditional approach, changes in exchange rates affect the profitability of firms and finally, results in a change in stock prices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the three tests show that there is a “negative” relationship between two variables and therefore, portfolio balance approach is supported.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There are two approaches for the relationship between exchange rates and stock prices including "traditional" and "portfolio balance" approaches. According to traditional approach, changes in exchange rates affect the profitability of firms and finally, results in a change in stock prices. In this approach, there is a positive relationship between these two variables. On portfolio balance approach, the increase in stock prices has a reducing effect on exchange rate and leads to a negative relationship. In this study questioning of the validity of these approaches for the period 01/04/2002-31/07/2012, the relationship between TL/USD exchange rate and IMKB100 price index is being investigated by using FMOLS, CCR and DOLS methods in Turkey. The results of the three tests show that there is a “negative” relationship between two variables and therefore, portfolio balance approach is supported.

Özet

Döviz kurları ve hisse senedi fiyatları arasındaki ilişkiye yönelik “geleneksel” ve “portföy dengesi” yaklaşımları olmak üzere iki yaklaşım bulunmaktadır. Geleneksel yaklaşıma göre döviz kurunun değişmesi firmaların kârlılığını etkileyerek hisse senedi fiyatlarında bir değişmeye neden olmakta ve bu iki değişken arasında pozitif bir ilişki bulunmaktadır. Portföy dengesi yaklaşımında ise hisse senedi fiyatlarının artması döviz kurunda azaltıcı bir etkiye ve negatif bir ilişkiye neden olmaktadır. Bu yaklaşımların geçerliliğinin sorgulandığı bu çalışmada 01/04/2002-31/07/2012 dönemi için Türkiye’de TL/USD döviz kuru ile İMKB100 fiyat endeksi arasındaki ilişki FMOLS, CCR ve DOLS yöntemleri kullanılarak araştırılmaktadır. Üç testin sonuçları iki değişken arasında “negatif” bir ilişkinin var olduğunu ve bu nedenle portföy dengesi yaklaşımının desteklendiğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BERKE, B. (2012). Exchange rate and IMKB100 index relationship: A new test. Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 163, 243–257. https://ajindex.com/articles/79017

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abdalla, I.S. ve Murinde, V. (1997), “Exchange Rate and Stock Price Interactions in Emerging Financial Markets: Evidence on India, Korea, Pakistan and the Philippines”, Applied Financial Economics, 7, 25-35.
  2. Aggarwal, R. (1981), “Exchange Rates and Stock Prices: A Study of US Capital Markets Under Floating Exchange Rates”, Akron Business and Economics Review, 12, 7-12.
  3. Aggarwal, R. ve Soenen, L. (1989), “Financial Prices as Determinants of Changes in Currency Values”, 25th Annual Meetings of Eastern Finance Association Philadelphia. Ajayi, R.A. ve Mougoue, M. (1996), “On the Dynamic Relation between Stock Prices and Exchange Rates”, Journal of Finacial Research, 19, 193-207.
  4. Ajayi, R.A., Friedman, J. ve Mehdian, A.M. (1998), “On the Relationship between Stock Returns and Exchange Rates: Test of Granger Causality”, Global Finance Journal, 9(2), 241-251.
  5. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. ve Sohrabian, A. (1992), “Stock Prices and Effective Exchange Rate of the Dolar”, Applied Economics, 24, 459-464.
  6. Branson, W.H. (1983), Macroeconomic Determinants of Real Exchange Rate Risk, In R.J. Herring (ed.) Managing Foreign Exchange Risk, Cambridge University Press.
  7. Canova, F. ve DeNicolo, G. (1995), “Stock Markets and Real Activity: A Structural Approach”, European Economic Review, 39, 981-1015.
  8. Cheung, Y.W. ve Lai, K. S. (1993), “Fractional Cointegration Analysis of Purchasing Power Parity”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 11(1), 103-112.
  9. Cornell, B. (1983), “The Money Supply Announcement Puzzle: Review and Interpretation”, American Economic Review, 73, 644-657.
  10. Dickey, D.A. ve Fuller, W.A. (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, 49, 1057-1072.
  11. Dornbusch, R. ve Fisher, S. (1980),“Exchange Rates and the Current Account”, American Economic Review, 70(5), 960-971.
  12. Engle, R.F. ve Granger, C.W.J. (1987),“Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing”, Econometrica, 55, 251-276.
  13. Franck, P. ve Young, A. (1972), “Stock Price Reaction of Multinational Firms to Exchange Realignments”, Financial Management, 1, 66-73.
  14. Granger, C.W.J., Huang, B. ve Yang, C.W. (1998), “A Bivariate Causality between Stock Prices and Exchange Rates: Evidence from Recent Asian Flu”, University of California, San Diego, https://www3.bcb.gov.br/pec/wps/ingl/wps124.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10/10/2012)
  15. Griffin, J., Nardari, F. ve Stulz, R.M. (2004), "Are Daily Cross-Border Equity Flows Pushed or Pulled?", The Review of