Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2008 / Sayı: 155

Economic Criteria of the European Union and Turkey

Avrupa Birliği'nin Ekonomik Kriterleri ve Türkiye

Pages
11–38
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this paper, it is aimed to evaluate Turkey economy in respect to these economic criteria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are some criteria to be fulfilled by the countries in the European Union (EU), which some of them are for joining the EU while some of them are for joining the EU economic and monetary union.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Main indicators in analyzing Copenhagen economic criteria are the existence of a functioning market economy and the capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union, while Maastrich criteria are composed of major macroeconomic indicators, such as inflation rate, interest rate, exchange rate mechanism- ERM-II, and government financial position (budget deficit and government debt).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper, it is aimed to evaluate Turkey economy in respect to these economic criteria.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There are some criteria to be fulfilled by the countries in the European Union (EU), which some of them are for joining the EU while some of them are for joining the EU economic and monetary union. To join the EU, a candidate Member State must meet three criteria (political, economic and ability to take on the obligations of membership). These are called as Copenhagen economic criteria. Also, after being a member, a counry has to fulfill the four criteria, that are called Maastricht convegence criteria. Main indicators in analyzing Copenhagen economic criteria are the existence of a functioning market economy and the capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union, while Maastrich criteria are composed of major macroeconomic indicators, such as inflation rate, interest rate, exchange rate mechanism- ERM-II, and government financial position (budget deficit and government debt). In this paper, it is aimed to evaluate Turkey economy in respect to these economic criteria.

Özet

Avrupa Birliği’nin (AB) aday ve üye ülkelerden yerine getirmesini beklediği bazı kriterler vardır. Bu kriterlerden bazıları AB’ye tam üye olmak için yerine getirilmesi gerekirken, diğerleri hali hazırda AB üyesi olan ülkelerin ekonomik ve parasal birlik (EPB) alanına dahil olmak için gerekli kriterlerdir. AB’ye üye olmak için karşılanması gereken üç kriter (siyasi, ekonomik ve uyum kriterleri) Kopenhag kriterleri olarak bilinmektedir. Kopenhag ekonomik kriterleri açısından aday ülke ekonomisi, işleyen bir serbest piyasa ekonomisi olup olmadığı ve AB içinde rekabet baskısına dayanabilme gücüne sahip olma açısından değerlendirilmektedir. AB üyesi ülkelerin EPB alanına dahil olabilmek için yerine getirmeleri gereken ekonomik kriterler ise Maastricht yakınlaşma kriterleri olarak isimlendirilmekte ve enflasyon, faiz, döviz kuru ve devletin finansal durum kriterlerinden (bütçe ve borç kriteri) oluşmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, AB’nin bu ekonomik kriterler açısından Türkiye ekonomisinin değerlendirmesi yapılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇAY, B. (2008). Economic Criteria of the European Union and Turkey. Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 155, 11–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/78970

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Akalın, G. (2002), Türkiye’de Piyasa Ekonomisi’ne Geçiş Süreci ve Ekonomik Kriz. TİSK Yayınları,
  2. Tşof Plaka Matbaacılık. Akçay, B. (2006), Avrupa Para Sisteminden Ekonomik Parasal Birliğe”, İktisat, İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, 21(248), Kasim. 14-32.
  3. Aktan, C. (1994),
  4. Gerçek Liberalizm Nedir, T Yayınları,
  5. Mart Matbaacılık, İzmir.
  6. Baldwin, R. ve Wyplosz, C. (2005), The Economics of European Integration, Second Edition, The McGraw-Hill Companies. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1998).Turkey 1998 Regular Report. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/1998/package/sec_1426_final_regular_report_tr_en.pdf (07.10.2007). Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1999). Turkey 1999 Regular Report. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/1999/package/sec_1426_final_regular_report_tr_en.pdf (07.10.2007). Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2000). Turkey 2000 Regular Report. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2000/package/sec_1426_final_regular_report_tr_en.pdf (07.10.2007). Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2001). Turkey 2001 Regular Report. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2001/package/sec_1426_final_regular_report_tr_en.pdf (07.10.2007). Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2002). Turkey 2002 Regular Report. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2002/package/sec_1426_final_regular_report_tr_en.pdf (07.10.2007). Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2003). Turkey 2003 Regular Report. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2003/package/sec_1426_final_regular_report_tr_en.pdf (07.10.2007). Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2004). Turkey 2004 Regular Report. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2004/package/sec_1426_final_regular_report_tr_en.pdf (07.10.2007). Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2005). Turkey 2005 Progress Report,http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2005/package/sec_1426_final_progress_report_tr_en.pdf (07.10.2007). Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2006). Turkey 2006 Progress Report. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2006/package/sec_1426_final_progress_report_tr_en.pdf (07.10.2007). Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2007). Turkey 2007 Progress Report. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2007/package/sec_1426_final_progress_report_tr_