Journals / Litera: Dil Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Opinions and suggestions of prospective teachers on the teaching of speaking skill in French: The case of Bursa Uludag University

Pages
219–242
Publication Date
2019-12-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings were then interpreted and presented as a situation assessment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, student views on how speaking should be taught in a beginner’s French class as a foreign language are analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To achieve this, a survey was carried out among the prospective teachers studying at the Department of French Language Teaching of the Faculty of Education at Bursa Uludağ University, at the end of the Fall 2011-2012 semester.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings were then interpreted and presented as a situation assessment.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2011-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Didactics of FFL · prospective teachers of FFL · oral proficiency

Abstract

In this study, student views on how speaking should be taught in a beginner’s French class as a foreign language are analyzed. To achieve this, a survey was carried out among the prospective teachers studying at the Department of French Language Teaching of the Faculty of Education at Bursa Uludağ University, at the end of the Fall 2011-2012 semester. The survey consisted of three open-ended questions. A total of 62 volunteers participated in the survey. The questions were: 1. Which methods and techniques should be used for effective French teaching? What approaches must be used to select these methods and techniques to make students more active and productive inside and outside the classroom? 2. How should the following four fundamental language skills be taught in French language teaching: a. Speaking; b. Reading; c. Writing; d. Listening; 3. Which assessment method(s), e.g. exams, should be used in French Language teaching and how should these methods be used? The link to the Google Docs survey was sent to students via electronic mail. In this survey, the students were asked to respond to the questions and share their opinions in Turkish. This study analyzes the students’ views on how the subject of the second question, speaking skills, should be taught. In this qualitative survey based on the screening model, the views were classified under various topics after undergoing content analysis and discussed in comparison to the literature. The findings were then interpreted and presented as a situation assessment.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARTAL, E., ALPAR, M. (2019). Opinions and suggestions of prospective teachers on the teaching of speaking skill in French: The case of Bursa Uludag University. Litera: Dil Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 219–242. https://ajindex.com/articles/788865

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abe, D., & Regent, O. (1981). Quand les apprenants prennent la parole. Etudes de linguistique appliquée, 41, 64-85.
  2. Abou Haidar, L., & Llorca, R. (éds.) (2016). L’oral par tous les sens: de la phonétique corrective à la didactique de la parole. Le Français dans le monde: recherches et applications (numéro spécial, juillet 2016, n° 60). Paris: Clé International. Alrabadi, E. (2011). Quelle méthodologie faut-il adopter pour l’enseignement/ apprentissage de l’oral ? Didáctica. Lengua y Literatura, 23, 15-34.
  3. Badereddine, A. (2014). Le développement de la compétence discursive à travers Les pratiques de classe de FLE: cas de la production orale en quatrième année de l’enseignement moyen (Mémoire présenté pour l’obtention du diplôme de Master II). Université d’El-Oued, Faculté des Lettres et des Langues, Département des Lettres et Langue Françaises. El-Oued, Algérie. Balighi, M., &Norouzi, M. (2016). L’enseignement / apprentissage de l’oral en français dans les universités iraniennes: le cas de l’Université de Tabriz. Recherches en langue et littérature françaises, 7, 27-56.
  4. Bandera Navarro, J. (2013). Comment parlent les étudiants de FLE ? Sortir de l’étape de mémorisation du discours à l’utilisation spontanée de la langue cible. Opening Writing Doors Journal, 10(1), 63-97.
  5. Bange, P. (1992). À propos de la communication et de l’apprentissage de L2. Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère, 1, 53-85.
  6. Baştürk, S. (2011). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının eğitim fakültesindeki eğitim-öğretim sürecini değerlendirmeleri. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 58-94.
  7. Benamar, R. (2009). Stratégies d’aide à la production orale en classe de FLE. Synergies Algérie, 8, 63-75.
  8. Benamar, R. (2012). Valorisation de l’oral dans les nouveaux programmes de FLE au secondaire algérien: enjeux et perspectives (Thèse de doctorat en didactique). Université Abou BekrBelkaïd Tlemcen, UFR des Lettres et des Langues. Chetouane, Algérie. Bigot, V. (1996). Converser en classe de langue: mythe ou réalité ? Les Carnets du CEDISCO, 4, 33- 46. Bouchard, R. (1984). Pour une méthodologie générale d’analyse des échanges verbaux en classe. In R. Bouchard (éd.), Interactions, les échanges langagiers en classe de langue (pp. 73-110).
  9. France, Grenoble: Centre de Didactique du Français, Université de Grenoble III. Bouchard, R. (1995). De l’enseignement de la langue orale à l’entraînement aux pratiques dialogiques. LIDIL, 12, 97-118.
  10. Boudina, M. Y. (2015). L’enseignement-apprentissage