Journals / Litera: Dil Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Accidental Humor in Consecutive Interpreting: Accidentally Useful Food for Thought

Pages
783–810
Publication Date
2021-12-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future studies may examine, among the others, verbal resources in the simultaneous interpreting context and compare the verbal resources in depth in consecutive with those in simultaneous interpreting.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Unlike humor translation, humor in translation, caused by translation errors, is underresearched in translation studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the study, a total of 38 accidentally humorous instances are found.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future studies may examine, among the others, verbal resources in the simultaneous interpreting context and compare the verbal resources in depth in consecutive with those in simultaneous interpreting.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Accidental humor · consecutive interpreting · humor

Abstract

Unlike humor translation, humor in translation, caused by translation errors, is underresearched in translation studies. Accidental humor, as a subgroup of humor, has been analyzed in translation contexts, but to the best knowledge of the author, not in the interpreting context. This descriptive study, being the first of its kind dealing with the accidental humor in consecutive interpreting, is intended to fill the gap in the verbal manifestations of resources in the English-Turkish interpreting context along with the possible reasons for resources of accidental humor in consecutive interpreting class. As a result of the study, a total of 38 accidentally humorous instances are found. The verbal resources are analyzed and divided into main and sub-categories, and for each, examples from the corpus are discussed. In addition, new linguistic resources were discovered, which may be exclusive to this context. The detected items are by no means meant to be exhaustive, as also stated by the former studies, but nevertheless enables greater understanding about the types and possible causes of accidental humor which may occur during the consecutive interpreting process. Given the dearth of literature on accidental humor in consecutive interpreting, this study may provide some insight for remedial teaching/learning in interpreting studies, as well as linguistics. Future studies may examine, among the others, verbal resources in the simultaneous interpreting context and compare the verbal resources in depth in consecutive with those in simultaneous interpreting.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKOÇ, N. Y. (2021). Accidental Humor in Consecutive Interpreting: Accidentally Useful Food for Thought. Litera: Dil Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 783–810. https://ajindex.com/articles/788822

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Agbedo, C. U., & Krisagebedo, E. C. (2014). ‘My Oga at the top’: Pragmatic failures in the Nigerian inter-lingual communication context and the linguistic mechanism of accidental humor. Innovare Journal of Social Sciences, 2(4), 28-34. google scholar Ageli, N. (2014). For better or for worse: The challenges of translating English humour into Arabic. Journal of Human Science, 23, 414-426. Retrieved from https://journal.uob.edu.bh/bitstream/handle/123456789/1229/ JHS20140209. pdf?sequence=1 google scholar Al-Kharabsheh, A. (2008). Unintentional humour in the translation of Jordanian shop signs. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 17, 1-21. Retrieved from http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr17/kharabsheh. pdf google scholar Askildson, L. (2005). Effects of humor in the language classroom: Humor as a pedagogical tool in theory and practice. Arizona Working Papers in SLAT, 12(1), 45-61. google scholar Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 4(3/4), 293-347. https://doi.Org/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293 google scholar Bainum, C, Lounsleury, K., & Pollio, H.R. (1984). The development of laughing and smiling in nursery school and children. Child Development, 55, 1946-1957. doi:10.1111/J.1467-8624.1984.TB00436.X google scholar Beckett, S. (1953). Watt. Paris: The Olimpia Press. google scholar Bröne, G. (2008). Hyper- and misunderstanding in interactional humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (12), 2027-2061. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.011 google scholar Bucaria, C. (2004). Lexical and syntactic ambiguity as a source of humor: The case of newspaper headlines. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research, 17(3), 279-310. google scholar Consalvo, C. (1989). Humor in management: No laughing matter. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 2, 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1989.2.3.285 google scholar Corder, S.P. (1973). Introducing Applied Linguistics. Middlesex: Penguin. google scholar Court. (2021, 25 February). In Merriam Webster. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ court#:~:text=(Entry%201%20of%202),king%20held%20a%20general%20court. google scholar Cousins, N. (1991). Anatomy of an illness as perceived by the patient. New York: Bantam. google scholar Critchley, S. (2002). On humour. London & New York: Routledge. google scholar Deneire, M. (1995). Humor and foreign language teaching. Humor: International Journal of