SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2018 / Sayı: 175

The Comparison of EU Reverse Charge Mechanism with Tax Witholding Procedure of Turkish Value Added Tax System

Avrupa Birliği KDV Tevkifatı Mekanizmasının Türk KDV Sistemindeki KDV Tevkifatı Müessesesi ile Karşılaştırılması

HİLMİ ÜNSAL
Birol UBAY
Pages
275–298
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mechanism differs from the tax witholding system which is effective in Turkish VAT system in respect to its procedure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:EU gives importance to Business to Business transactions within internal market.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For fighting against VAT fraud, EU introduced reverse charge mechanism for cross border B2B transactions within internal market.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mechanism differs from the tax witholding system which is effective in Turkish VAT system in respect to its procedure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

EU gives importance to Business to Business transactions within internal market. Functioning of internal market and ensuring free competition are linked with common Value Added Tax (VAT) system. According to EU VAT system, in respect to transactions between member states, VAT is charged by the destination country. It is because both sides of transactions are VAT taxpayers in their member states. But it lays the groundwork for VAT evasions by using missing trader fraud scheme. For fighting against VAT fraud, EU introduced reverse charge mechanism for cross border B2B transactions within internal market. The mechanism differs from the tax witholding system which is effective in Turkish VAT system in respect to its procedure.

Özet

Avrupa Birliği iç pazarda işletmeler arasında gerçekleşen sınır ötesi ticarete önem vermektedir. İç pazarın işleyişi ve serbest rekabet ortamının sağlanması ortak KDV sisteminin işleyişi ile bağlantılıdır. AB KDV sistemine göre iç pazarda üye ülkeler arasında gerçekleşen ticari işlemlerde KDV çıkış ülkesinde değil varış ülkesinde tahsil edilmektedir. Bunun nedeni ticari işlem taraflarının her ikisinin birden kendi ülkelerinde KDV mükellefi olmalarıdır. Ancak bu kayıp tacir hileciliğine zemin hazırlamaktadır. AB, KDV kaçakçılığı ile mücadele için Topluluk içinde gerçekleşen işletmeden işletmeye (B2B) satışlarda KDV tevkifatı (reverse charge) mekanizmasını uygulamaya sokmuştur. KDV stopajı mekanizması, Türk KDV sistemindeki vergi tevkifatı ile yöntem bakımından ayrışmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNSAL, H., UBAY, B. (2018). The Comparison of EU Reverse Charge Mechanism with Tax Witholding Procedure of Turkish Value Added Tax System. Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 175, 275–298. https://ajindex.com/articles/78871

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Andersson, H. ve Franzén, K. (2008), Value Add Value Added Tax-The Right to Deduct in Case of Carousel Fraud, Master Thesis, Jönköpinginter National Business School, Jönköping University, 18. Batrı, M. (2017), Is the Reverse Charge Mechanism an Effective Solution to European Union’s Value Added Tax Fraud? L.L.M. Dissertation, Tilburg University, 3. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1925/2004 of 29 October 2004 Laying Down Detailed Rules for Implementing Certain Provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 Concerning Administrative Cooperation in the Field of Value-Added Tax, OJ L 331, 5.11.2004, 13. Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the Common System of Value Added Tax, Official Journal of the European Union, L 347/1. Council Directive 2013/42/EU of 22 July 2013 Amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the Common System of Value Added Tax, As Regards a Quick Reaction Mechanism against VAT fraud, Official Journal of the European Union, L 201/1. Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the Harmonisation of the Laws of the Member States Relating to Turnover Taxes-Common System of Value-Added Tax: Uniform Basis Of Assessment. EU Business (2018), VAT Fraud Costs the EU EUR 50 Billion a Year, https://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/vat-fraud.21hk (Erişim Tarihi: 21.11.2018) Europex Assocation of European Energy Exchanges (2017),
  2. VAT Fraud-A Persisting Threat to Gas, Electricity and Emissions Trading, https://www.europex.org/consultation-responses/vat-fraud-a-persistingthreat- to-gas-electricity-and-emissions-trading-need-for-a-prolongationof- existing-derogation-and-an-extension-to-all-member-states/ (Erişim Tarihi: 21.11.2018)
  3. European Commission (2004), Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Use of Admintrative Cooperation Arrangements in the Fight Against VAT Fraud, 6. European Commission (2014), Assessment of the Application and Impact of the Optional “Reverse Charge Mechanism” within the EU VAT System, ISBN: 978-92-79-44429-6, Specific Contract No.6 TAXUD/2013/DE/333 Implementing Framework Contract No TAXUD/2012/CC/117, Final Report November, European Union, 4. European Commission (2018), VAT GAP, https://ec.europa.eu/taxation _customs/business/tax-cooperation-control/vat-gap_en (Erişim Tarihi: 23.07.2018)
  4. European Commission, Communication from the Commision to the Council in Accordance with Article 395 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC, Brussels, 28.10.2015,
  5. COM(2015)538 Final. Fedelli, S. ve Forte, F. (