Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2018 / Sayı: 175

Monetary Policy Independence under Flexible Exchange Rates after the 2008 Global Crisis:The Cases of Turkey and Brazil

2008 Küresel Kriz Sonrası Esnek Döviz Kuru Rejiminde Para Politikası Bağımsızlığı: Türkiye ve Brezilya Örneği

Pages
1–30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to these results, US Federal Reserve decisions influence both countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study, is to investigate the impact of the US Federal Reserve decisions on the policy stance of the Central Banks of Turkey and Brazil.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, an analysis was performed with a multiple structural breaks test in time series for the period of 2008:M1-2017:M12.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to these results, US Federal Reserve decisions influence both countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study, is to investigate the impact of the US Federal Reserve decisions on the policy stance of the Central Banks of Turkey and Brazil. In this context, an analysis was performed with a multiple structural breaks test in time series for the period of 2008:M1-2017:M12. The existence of the cointegration relationship between the series was analyzed with the cointegration test of Maki (2012) and it was detected that the series was cointegrated. The short and long term relationships examined by FMOLS method was found to be statistically significant. According to these results, US Federal Reserve decisions influence both countries.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı ABD Merkez Bankası faiz kararlarının Türkiye ve Brezilya Merkez Bankası politika duruşuna etkisini araştırmaktır. Bu kapsamda 2008:M1-2017:M12 dönemi için çoklu yapısal kırılmalı zaman serisi ile analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Seriler arasındaki eşbütünleşme ilişkisinin varlığı Maki (2012) eşbütünleşme testi ile analiz edilmiş ve serilerin eşbütünleşik olduğu belirlenmiştir. FMOLS yöntemi ile incelenen kısa ve uzun dönem ilişkisi ise istatistiki olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlara göre ABD Merkez Bankası kararları her iki ülkede etkilidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKER, O., SÜMER, A. L., AYDIN, N. (2018). Monetary Policy Independence under Flexible Exchange Rates after the 2008 Global Crisis:The Cases of Turkey and Brazil. Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 175, 1–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/78868

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alper, K., Kara, H. ve Yörükoğlu, M. (2012), “Rezerv Opsiyon Mekanizması”, TCMB Ekonomi Notları, 28, 1-14.
  2. Alper, K., Altunok, F. ve Çapacıoğlu, T. (2015), “ABD Merkez Bankası (Fed) Politikaları ve Bankacılık Sektörü Dış Borçlanması”, TCMB Ekonomi Notları, 2015-14, 1-13.
  3. Banco Central Do Brasil (2018), Interest Rates, https://www.bcb.gov.br/ Pec/Copom/Ingl/taxaSelic-i.asp (Erişim Tarihi: 20.12.2017)
  4. Bailliu, J., Lafrance, R. ve Peeroult, J.F. (2002), “Does Exchange Rate Policy Matter for Growth”, Bank of Canada Working Paper, 17(2002), 1-41.
  5. Başçı, E. ve Kara, H. (2011), “Finansal İstikrar ve Para Politikası”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 26(302). Borenstein, E., Zettelmeyer, J. ve Philippon, T. (2001), “Monetary Independence in Emerging Markets: Does the Exchange Rate Make a Difference”, IMF Working Papers, 1(1), 4-5.
  6. Calvo, G.A. ve Reinhart, C.M. (2002), “Fear of Floating”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(2), 379-408.
  7. Calvo, G.A. ve Mishkin, F.S. (2003), “The Mirage of Exchange Rate Regimes for Emerging Market Countries”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 99-118. Capistrán, C. ve Ramos-Francia, M. (2009), “Inflation Dynamics in Latin America, Banco de México Working Papers, No:2006-11.
  8. Capraru, B. ve Ihnatov, I. (2011), “The Effect of Exchange Rate Arrangements on Transmission of Interest Rates And Monetary Policy Independence: Evidence from A Group of New Eu Member Countries”, EconPapers, 58, 71-81.
  9. Ciarreta, A. ve Zarraga, A. (2009), “Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth in Spain”, Applied Economics Letters, 17(14), 1417-1421.
  10. Craigwell, R., Grenidge, K. ve Maynard, T. (2009), “Exchange Rate Regimes and Monetary Autonomy: Empirical Evidence from Selected Caribbean Countries”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 33437, 1-27.
  11. Çetin, M.Ö. (2016), “Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası (TCMB) Para Politikası Uygulamalarının Gelişimi”, Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 8(14), 67-101, ISSN:1309-1123, DOI: 10.14784/jfrs.87278. Çetin, M. ve Şeker, F. (2013), “Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar ve İhracat İlişkisi: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler Üzerine Bir Nedensellik Analizi”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 8(1), 121-142.
  12. Dolado, J.L. ve Lütkepohl, H. (1996), “Making Wald Tests Work for Cointegrated VAR Systems”, Econometric Reviews, 15, 369-386.
  13. Dornbusch, R. (1976), “Expectations and Exchange Rate Dynamics”, The Journal of Political Economy, 1161-1176.
  14. Edwards, S. (2015), “Monetary Policy Independence Under Flexible Exchange Rat