Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2018 / Sayı: 174

An Analysis of Relationship between Military Expenditure and Economic Growth in Turkey (1960-2016)

Türkiye’de Askeri Harcamalar ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişkinin Bir Analizi (1960-2016)

Pages
175–202
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, Maki’s (2012) cointegration test with multiple breaks results show that there is no relationship between military expenditıres and GDP per capita.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A growth number of empirical studies have investigated the relationship between military expenditures and economic growth in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is re-examining the relationship between military expenditures and economic growth covering the period of 1960 and 2016 within the context of cointegration and causality analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, Maki’s (2012) cointegration test with multiple breaks results show that there is no relationship between military expenditıres and GDP per capita.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A growth number of empirical studies have investigated the relationship between military expenditures and economic growth in Turkey. However, there is no consensus on the relationship between military expenditures and economic growth in literature. The aim of this study is re-examining the relationship between military expenditures and economic growth covering the period of 1960 and 2016 within the context of cointegration and causality analysis. In addition to traditional analysis, we employed cointegration test with multi structural breaks and time-varying causality analysis. According toBayer and Hanck’s (2013) standart cointegration test results the military expenditures negatively affect long-run GDP per capita. However, Maki’s (2012) cointegration test with multiple breaks results show that there is no relationship between military expenditıres and GDP per capita. On the other hand, time-varying causality results also indicate that the causal linkage between military expenditures and economic growth has disappeared due to economic and politic shifts in Turkey after the middle of 1970s.

Özet

Türkiye’de askeri harcama-ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi üzerine çok sayıda çalışma yapılmıştır. Bununla beraber daha önceki çalışmaların sonuçları fikir birliği sağlamaktan uzaktır. Bu çalışmanın amacı 1960-2016 dönemi için askeri harcamalar ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkiyi eşbütünleşme ve nedensellik bağlamında yeniden araştırmaktır. Araştırmada, geleneksel analizlere ilave olarak çoklu yapısal kırılmalı eşbütünleşme ve zamanla değişen nedensellik analizleri de uygulanmıştır. Bayer ve Hanck (2013) standart güçlü eşbütünleşme testi sonuçlarına göre askeri harcamalar uzun dönem kişi başı milli geliri negatif yönde etkilemektedir. Bununla beraber Maki (2012) çoklu yapısal kırılmalı eşbütünleşme testi sonuçları askeri harcamalar ile kişi başı milli gelir arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olmadığını göstermektedir. Öte yandan zamanla değişen nedensellik analizi sonuçları ekonomik ve politik gelişmeler nedeniyle 1970’li yılların ortalarından itibaren Türkiye’de askeri harcamaekonomik büyüme bağının ortadan kalktığını ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPAL, M. H. (2018). An Analysis of Relationship between Military Expenditure and Economic Growth in Turkey (1960-2016). Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 174, 175–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/78859

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Abu-Bader, S. ve Abu-Qarn, A.S. (2003), “Government Expenditures, Military Spending and Economic Growth: Causality Evidence From Egypt, Israel, and Syria”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 25(6), 567-583.
  2. Aizenman, J. ve Glick. R. (2006), “Military Expenditure, Threats, and Growth”, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 15(2), 129-155.
  3. Alper, A.E. (2017), “The Impact of Defense, Health and Education Expenditures on Economic Growth in Turkey”, Uluslararası Ticaret ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 59-70.
  4. Antonakis, N. (1999), “Guns Versus Butter: A Multisectoral Approach to Military Expenditure and Growth with Evidence from Greece, 1960- 1993”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 43(4), 501-520.
  5. Ateşoğlu, H.S. (2002), “Defense Spending Promotes Aggregate Output in The United States- Evidence From Cointegration Analysis”, Defence and Peace Economics, 13(1), 55–60.
  6. Augier, M., Mcnab, R., Guo, J. ve Karber, P. (2017), “Defense Spending and Economic Growth: Evidence from China, 1952-2012”, Defence and Peace Economics 28(1), 65-90.
  7. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. ve Mestre, R. (1998), “Error-Correction Mechanism Tests for Cointegration in a Single-Equation Framework”, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267-283.
  8. Barro, R.J. (1990), “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 103-125.
  9. Bayer, C. ve Hanck, C. (2013), “Combining Non‐Cointegration Tests”, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 34(1), 83-95.
  10. Benoit, E. (1978), “Growth and Defense in Developing Countries”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26(2), 271-280.
  11. Biswas, B. ve Ram. R. (1986), “Military Spending and Economic Growth in Less Developed Countries: An Augmented Model and Further Evidence”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 34(2), 361-372.
  12. Boswijk, H.P. (1994), “Testing for an Unstable Root in Conditional and Structural Error Correction Models”, Journal of Econometrics, 63(1), 37-60.
  13. Canbay, Ş. ve Mercan, D. (2017), “Savunma Harcamalarının Ekonomik Büyüme ve Cari İşlemler Dengesine Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği”, Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 2(2), 86-104.
  14. Candar, Ö. (2003), Military Expenditures and Economic Growth in Turkey. Doctoral Dissertation, Bilkent University The Department of Management, Ankara.
  15. Chang, T., Fang, W., Wen, L.F. ve Liu, C. (2001), “Defence Spending, Economic Growth and Temporal Causality: Evidence from Taiwan and Mainland China, 1952-1995”, Applied Economics, 33(10), 1289-1299.
  16. Chang, H.C., Huan