Journals / Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Ovarian Torsion and Surgical Treatment: Five-year’s experience of a tertiary center

Over Torsiyonu ve Cerrahi Tedavisi: Tersiyer bir merkezin 5 yıllık deneyimi

Pages
33–42
Publication Date
2018-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Organ-sparing surgery should be the first choice preferably with a laparoscopic approach.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In current study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and laboratory findings and surgical methods in patients treated with a surgical approach for ovarian torsion in a period of five years in our institute.Materials and Methods: The demographic characteristics, clinical and laboratory findings of patients who admitted to emergeny unit of our hospital and underwent a surgery for a diagnosis of ovarian torsion in between January 2013 and January 2018 and surgical methods used were collected via digital patient database.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The relevant data was assessed.Results: The mean age of the patient 32 patients who had eligible medical records was 27.2±10.5.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Organ-sparing surgery should be the first choice preferably with a laparoscopic approach.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:over torsiyonu · laparoskopik cerrahi · ultrason

Abstract

Objective: In current study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and laboratory findings and surgical methods in patients treated with a surgical approach for ovarian torsion in a period of five years in our institute.Materials and Methods: The demographic characteristics, clinical and laboratory findings of patients who admitted to emergeny unit of our hospital and underwent a surgery for a diagnosis of ovarian torsion in between January 2013 and January 2018 and surgical methods used were collected via digital patient database. The relevant data was assessed.Results: The mean age of the patient 32 patients who had eligible medical records was 27.2±10.5. Nine (28.1%) of 32 patients was virgo. All the patients had abdominal or pelvic pain. 15 (46.7%) patients had nausea, 7 (6.2%) had vomitting and 2 (6.2%) had fever. Two of patients were pregnant during diagnosis. 19 (59.35) patients had righ-sided ovarian torsion and 13(40.7) had left-sided. The mean average diameter of the torsioned ovary was 92.5±46.3 mm. Ovarian blood flow was compromised in 15 (46.8%) patients in color doppler sonographic evaluation. Laparoscopic surgery was preferred for 23 (71.9%) patients and laparotomy for 9.Conclusion: The early intervention of a torsioned ovary, a gynecologic emergency, has a critical role to secure the affected organ and to preserve its functions with the evaluation of the patient’s physical examination findings, laboratory and imaging findings. Organ-sparing surgery should be the first choice preferably with a laparoscopic approach.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda son 5 yılda hastanemizde over torsiyonu tanısı ile opere ettiğimiz hastaların klinik ve laboratuvar bulguları ile uygulanan cerrahi tedavi yöntemlerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Elektronik ortamda arşiv taraması yapılarak Ocak 2013 ile Ocak 2018 tarihleri arasında hastanemizin acil servis servisine başvuran ve over torsiyonu tanısı ile opere edilen hastaların demografik özelliklerinin yanı sıra klinik ve laboratuvar bulguları ile uygulanan cerrahi tedavi yaklaşımları kaydedildi ve bulguların analizi yapıldı. Bulgular: Kayıtlarına ulaşılan toplam 32 hastanın yaş ortalaması 27.2±10.5 olarak bulundu ve 9(%28.1) hasta virgo idi. Acil servise başvuran bütün hastalarda abdominal ve/veya pelvik ağrı mevcut olup, 15(%46.8) hastada bulantı, 7(%21.8) hastada kusma ve 2(%6.2) hastada ateş görüldü. Over torsiyonu saptanan 2 hastada gebelik mevcuttu. Olguların 19(%59.3)’unda torsiyon sağ tarafta iken 13(%40.7) olguda sol taraftaydı. Torsiyone olan kitlenin boyutu ortalama 92.5±46.3 mm olup olguların 15(%46.8)’inde ultrasonografik incelemede ovaryen akım saptanmadı. Hastaların 23(%71.9)’ünde laparoskopik yaklaşım uygulanırken 9(%28.1) hastada laparatomi tercih edildi. Sonuç: Over torsiyonu jinekolojik acil bir durum olup hastanın fizik muayene bulguları başta olmak üzere laboratuvar ve görüntüleme sonuçları ile değerlendirilerek erken müdahalesi torsiyone olmuş organların korunabilmesi ve fonksiyonlarını devam ettirebilmesi için kritik önemdedir. Cerrahi yaklaşımda da laparoskopi ön planda tercih edilmeli ve organ koruyucu yaklaşımlar tedavide ilk seçenek olmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAY, T., YARDIMCI, O. D., HOCAOĞLU, M., BÖR, E. D., ERDEM, G. (2018). Ovarian Torsion and Surgical Treatment: Five-year’s experience of a tertiary center. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 33–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/783360

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Pansky M, Smorgick N, Herman A, Schneider D, Halperin R. Torsion of normal adnexa in postmenarchal women and risk of recurrence. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:355-9.
  2. White M, Stella J. Ovarian torsion: 10-year perspective. Emerg Med Australas 2005;17:231-7.
  3. Rousseau V, Massicot R, Darwish AA, Sauvat F, Emond S, Thibaud E, et al. Emergency management and conservative surgery of ovarian torsion in children: a report of 40 cases. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2008;21:201-6.
  4. Eitan R, Galoyan N, Zuckerman B, Shaya M, Shen O, Beller U. The risk of malignancy in post-menopausal women presenting with adnexal torsion. Gynecol Oncol 2007;106:211-4.
  5. Bider D, Mashiach S, Dulitzky M, Kokia E, Lipitz S, Ben-Rafael Z. Clinical, surgical and pathologic findings of adnexal torsion in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;173:363-6.
  6. Mazouni C, Bretelle F, Menard JP, Blanc B, Gamerre M. Diagnosis of adnexal torsion and predictive factors of adnexal necrosis]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2005;33:102-6.
  7. Tsafrir Z, Azem F, Hasson J, Solomon E, Almog B, Nagar H, et al. Risk factors, symptoms, and treatment of ovarian torsion in children: the twelve-year experience of one center. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012;19(1):29-33.
  8. Houry D, Abbott JT. Ovarian torsion: a fifteen-year review. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:156-9.
  9. Kart C, Aran T, Guven S, Karahan SC, Yulug E. Acute increase in plasma D-dimer level in ovarian torsion: an experimental study. Hum Reprod 2011;26:564-8.
  10. Tobiume T, Shiota M, Umemoto M, Kotani Y, Hoshiai H. Predictive factors for ovarian necrosis in torsion of ovarian tumor. Tohoku J Exp Med 2011;225:211-4
  11. Shadinger LL, Andreotti RF, Kurian RL. Preoperative sonographic and clinical characteristics as predictors of ovarian torsion. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27(1):7-13
  12. Lee JH, Park SB, Shin SH, Jang JC, Lee WC, Jeong AK, et al. Value of intraadnexal and extra-adnexal computed tomographic imaging features diagnosing torsion of adnexal tumor. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009;33:872-6
  13. Lee EJ, Kwon HC, Joo HJ, Suh JH, Fleischer AC. Diagnosis of ovarian torsion with color Doppler sonography:depiction of twisted vascular pedicle. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17(2):83-9.
  14. Hasson J, Tsafrir Z, Azem F, et al. Comparison of adnexal torsion between pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202(6):536-9.
  15. Bayer AI, Wiskind AK. Adnexal torsion: can the adnexa be saved? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171(6): 1506-10
  16. Comerci JT Jr, Licciardi F, Bergh PA, Gregori C, Breen JL. Mature cystic teratoma