SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Universal Mathematics / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

INTERPRETATION OF PHYSICAL CONDITIONS OF SCHOOLS WITH FUZZY MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING

Feride TUĞRUL
Mehmet ÇİTİL
Beyza KARASOLAK
Mehmet DAĞLI
Pages
46–52
Publication Date
2020-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results have been compared with the official data.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The education system has 4 basic elements.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These; education system, educator, student (education student) and physical facility.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results have been compared with the official data.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fuzzy sets · multi criteria decision making

Abstract

The education system has 4 basic elements. These; education system, educator, student (education student) and physical facility. In this study, the physical condition is researched. The aim of this study is to evaluate and interpret the suitability of the physical structures of schools in terms of education and training according to teachers by the multi-criteria decision making method in fuzzy logic. One of the factors affecting success is the physical structure. This study has been conducted with the help of teachers' ideas to determine whether physical structure has an impact on student achievement. This study is an application of a multi-criteria decision-making method, as there are many factors affecting physical structure. In this study 'individual interview' technique has been applied to interpret physical conditions of schools. Scores obtained as a result of individual interviews have been interpreted using multi criteria decision making method. Teachers' ideas aecting success have been taken into consideration. The results have been compared with the official data.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUĞRUL, F., ÇİTİL, M., KARASOLAK, B., DAĞLI, M. (2020). INTERPRETATION OF PHYSICAL CONDITIONS OF SCHOOLS WITH FUZZY MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING. Journal of Universal Mathematics, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 46–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/782206

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Zadeh. L.A. Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control, Vol.8, pp.338-353, (1965).
  2. Atanassov, K. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.20, No.1, pp.87-96, (1986).
  3. Majumder. M, Multi Criteria Decision Making, Chapter 2, Springer, pp.35-47, (2015).
  4. Nadaban. S, Dzitac. S, Dzitac. I, Fuzzy TOPSIS: A General View, Information Technology and Quantitative Management, 823-831, (2016).
  5. Hwang CL, Yoon KP. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, A State-of-the-Art Survey. Berlin: Springer-Verlang; (1981).
  6. Akbaba. A, Turhan. M, Ilköğretim Okul Binalarının Fiziksel Sorunlarına İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi (Van İli Örneği), KTÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(12), (2016).
  7. Şensoy. S, Sağsöz. A, Öğrenci Başarısının Sınıfların Fiziksel Koşulları ile İlişkisi, Ahi Evran Universitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol.16, No.3, pp.87-104, (2015).
  8. Yımaz. A, İlköğretim Okullarının Fiziksel Yapılarının Eğitim Ve Öğretim Açısından Değerlendirilmesi,Balikesir University The Journal of Social Sciences Institute, Vol.15, No.28, pp.77-107, (2012).
  9. Aydoğan. İ, Okul Binalarının Özellikleri ve Öğrenciler Üzerine Etkileri, Milli Eğitim Dergisi, Vol.193, pp.29-43, (2012).
  10. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Eğitim Yapıları Asgari Tasarım Standartları Kılavuzu, (2015).
  11. Tuğrul. F, Çitil. M, Yılmaz. B, School Success Ranking in Multi Criteria Decision Making, Turk. J. Math. Comput. Sci., Vol.10, pp.1-6, (2018).
  12. Tzeng. G.H, Huang. J.J, Multiple Attribute Decision Making, CRC press, Unites States of America, (2011).