Journals / Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Removal of Zinc from an Aqueous Solution Using Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) with Surfactants

Pages
691–700
Publication Date
2018-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that by adding SDS anionic surfactant, the permeate flux and the removal efficiency of zinc increased.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the present study, the optimum conditions have been investigated for the separation of Zn2+ ions from aqueous media by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF).
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, optimum conditions for the concentration of surface active agent in the feed solution (sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS), cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB), triton-X-100 (TX100)), filtering pressure, stirring rate and for the membrane porosity have been determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that by adding SDS anionic surfactant, the permeate flux and the removal efficiency of zinc increased.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration · SDS · CTAB

Abstract

In the present study, the optimum conditions have been investigated for the separation of Zn2+ ions from aqueous media by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF). For this purpose, optimum conditions for the concentration of surface active agent in the feed solution (sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS), cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB), triton-X-100 (TX100)), filtering pressure, stirring rate and for the membrane porosity have been determined. It is shown that the filtering pressure has a significant effect on the permeate flux but a relatively insignificant impact on rejection of Zn2+. Permeate flux increased linearly with increasing pressure, ranging from 0.32 mLmin-1m-2 at 3 bar to 0.72 mLmin-1m-2 at 4 bar. The results showed that by adding SDS anionic surfactant, the permeate flux and the removal efficiency of zinc increased. Best results in terms of zinc rejection coefficient is 97.5 % at 5.0 x 10-4 M zinc concentration, 1.0 x 10-2 M SDS concentration (~x 8 cmc), stirring rate 500 rpm and transmembrane pressure 4 bar.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞ, D. Ş. (2018). Removal of Zinc from an Aqueous Solution Using Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration (MEUF) with Surfactants. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 691–700. https://ajindex.com/articles/781407

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Goldfrank LR, Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies, 8th Edition, McGraw Hill, New York, 2006
  2. Vega M, Augusto M, Talío MC, Fernández LP. Surfactant Enhanced Chemofiltration of Zinc Traces Previous to Their Determination by Solid Surphase Fluorescence American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2011 Dec; 2: 902-908
  3. Lenntech, www.lenntech.com/periodic/ water/zinc/zinc-and-water.htm 4. Trıvunac K, Sekulıc Z and Stevanovıc S. Zinc removal from wastewater by a complexation–microfiltration process. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2012; 77(11): 1661-1670
  4. Fu F and Wang Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. Journal of Environmental Management. 2011 Mar; 92(3):407-413
  5. Rahmanian B, Pakizeh M and Maskooki A. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of zinc in synthetic wastewater using spiral-wound membrane Journal of hazardous materials. 2010 Dec; 184(1-3): 261-267
  6. Scamehorn J, Dunn Jr, Christian S. Simultaneous removal of dissolved organics and divalent metal cations from water using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Colloids and Surfaces, 1989; 35(1): 49-56
  7. Hankins N, Hilal NO, O Ogunbiyi, Azzopardi B. Inverted polarity micellar enhanced ultrafiltration for the treatment of heavy metal polluted wastewater. Desalination, 2005; 185(1-3):185–202
  8. Landaburu-Aguirre J, García V, Pongrácz E, Keiski R. The removal of zinc from synthetic wastewaters by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration: statistical design of experiments. Desalination. 2009 May; 240(1-3): 262-269
  9. Landaburu-Aguirre J, Pongrácz E, Perämäki, Keiski R. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for the removal of cadmium and zinc: Use of response surface methodology to improve understanding of process performance and optimisation. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2010 Aug; 180(1): 524–534
  10. Scamehorn, J.F., Ellington, R.T. and Christian, S.D. Removal of Multivalent Metal Cations from Water using Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration, Recent Separation Techniques-Ill, AICE symposium Series 250, p. 48-58 (1986)
  11. Scamehom, J.F, Christian, S.D. and Ellington, R.T. Use of Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration to Remove Multivalent Metal Ions from Aqueous Streams. In: Surfactant-Based Separation Process, edited by Scamehorn, J.F. and Harwell, J.H., Surfactant Science Series, Vol. 33, p. 29-51, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY (1989)
  12. Akita S, Takeuchi H, Yang L. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of gold(III) with nonionic surfactant. J. Membr. Sci. 1997; 133(2): 189-194
  13. Staszak K, Re