Journals / Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF FLUORIDE, ACETATE, FORMATE, CHLORIDE, NITRATE, AND SULFATE IN DISTILLED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITH ION CHROMATOGRAPHY/CONDUCTIVITY DETECTOR

Pages
661–674
Publication Date
2020-10-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The validated method was applied to the three kinds of commercial samples: Turkish raki, vodka, and gin.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A novel ion chromatography with suppressed conductivity detection method was developed for simultaneous determination of fluoride, acetate, formate, chloride, nitrate, and sulphate in distilled alcoholic beverages.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The chromatographic conditions were as follows: the suppressor current was 31 mA; the flow rate of the mobile phase was 0.25 mL min-1; the column and detector compartment temperature were 35 °C and 40 °C, respectively; sample loop volume was 10 μL.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The validated method was applied to the three kinds of commercial samples: Turkish raki, vodka, and gin.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ion chromatography · anion analysis · distilled alcoholic beverages

Abstract

A novel ion chromatography with suppressed conductivity detection method was developed for simultaneous determination of fluoride, acetate, formate, chloride, nitrate, and sulphate in distilled alcoholic beverages. In this study, bromide was used as an internal standard. The separation of the anions was accomplished by utilising an anion exchange column with gradient eluent program. The chromatographic conditions were as follows: the suppressor current was 31 mA; the flow rate of the mobile phase was 0.25 mL min-1; the column and detector compartment temperature were 35 °C and 40 °C, respectively; sample loop volume was 10 μL. All the calibration curves showed good linearity (r2 ≥ 0.999). The limits of detection (LOD) values were between 0.56 and 13.2 μg L-1 while the limits of quantification (LOQ) values were between 1.80 and 43.9 μg L-1. To evaluate the accuracy, a raki sample was spiked with standard solutions at three different concentration levels and the average recoveries were found in the range of 94.90% - 101.71%. Intra-day and inter-day precision studies were also investigated and the relative standard deviations (RSDs %) were less than 5.99%. The validated method was applied to the three kinds of commercial samples: Turkish raki, vodka, and gin.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLER, M., DESTANOĞLU, O., YILMAZ, G. G. (2020). SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF FLUORIDE, ACETATE, FORMATE, CHLORIDE, NITRATE, AND SULFATE IN DISTILLED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITH ION CHROMATOGRAPHY/CONDUCTIVITY DETECTOR. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 661–674. https://ajindex.com/articles/781182

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Destanoğlu O, Ateş İ. Determination and Evaluation of Methanol, Ethanol and Higher Alcohols in Legally and Illegally Produced Alcoholic Beverages. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society, Section A: Chemistry. 2019;6(1):21-8
  2. Hovda KE, Urdal P, Jacobsen D. Increased serum formate in the diagnosis of methanol poisoning. Journal of analytical toxicology. 2005;29(6):586-8
  3. Zakharov S, Navrátil T, Pelclova D. Analysis of serum anion gap and osmolal gap in diagnosis and prognosis of acute methanol poisoning: clinical study in 86 patients. Monatshefte für Chemie-Chemical Monthly. 2015;146(5):787-94
  4. Destanoğlu O, İsmail A. Evaluation of Formic Acid Concentrations in Postmortem Blood Samples Using Hs-GcMs System. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Sciences. 2019;16(3):155-63
  5. Treichel JL, Henry MM, Skumatz CM, Eells JT, Burke JM. Antioxidants and ocular cell type differences in cytoprotection from formic acid toxicity in vitro. Toxicological sciences. 2004;82(1):183-92
  6. Grzybowski A, Zülsdorff M, Wilhelm H, Tonagel F. Toxic optic neuropathies: an updated review. Acta ophthalmologica. 2015;93(5):402-10
  7. US.EPA. Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values for Formic Acid. 2010. Contract No.: EPA/690/R-10/015F 8. Cortés S, Gil ML, Fernández E. Volatile composition of traditional and industrial Orujo spirits. Food Control. 2005;16(4):383-8
  8. Osobamiro T. Analysis of some contaminants commonly found in alcoholic beverages. Am-Eur J Sci Res. 2013;8(1):53-6
  9. Kamphorst JJ, Chung MK, Fan J, Rabinowitz JD. Quantitative analysis of acetyl-CoA production in hypoxic cancer cells reveals substantial contribution from acetate. Cancer & metabolism. 2014;2(1):23
  10. US.EPA. Reassessment of One Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance for Ethyl Acetate and One Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance for Amyl Acetate. 2006
  11. Browne D, Whelton H, O'Mullane D. Fluoride metabolism and fluorosis. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33(3):177-86
  12. DenBesten P, Li W. Chronic fluoride toxicity: dental fluorosis. Fluoride and the oral environment. 22: Karger Publishers; 2011. p. 81-96
  13. Martínez-Mier EA. Fluoride: its metabolism, toxicity, and role in dental health. Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine. 2012;17(1):28-32
  14. Buldini PL, Cavalli S, Trifirò A. State-of-the-art ion chromatographic determination of inorganic ions in food. Journal of Chromatography A. 1997;789(1-2):529-48
  15. Jagadish R, S