Journals / Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Potential Barriers to Sustainable Construction: A Model Proposal

Pages
440–449
Publication Date
2020-10-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of this study; it is thought that it will make important contributions to the literature by revealing the factors that prevent sustainable practices in the Turkish Construction Industry and by enriching the developed scale with different and various factors in future studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to identify potential barriers to sustainable construction in the Turkish Construction Industry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, a survey was conducted covering architects, civil engineers and other (project manager, mechanical engineers, ets.) professionals working in the Turkish Construction Industry.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of this study; it is thought that it will make important contributions to the literature by revealing the factors that prevent sustainable practices in the Turkish Construction Industry and by enriching the developed scale with different and various factors in future studies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sustainable Construction · Barriers · Factor Analysis

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to identify potential barriers to sustainable construction in the Turkish Construction Industry. To this end, a survey was conducted covering architects, civil engineers and other (project manager, mechanical engineers, ets.) professionals working in the Turkish Construction Industry. Based on the data obtained from the survey, the scale of “Potential Barriers to Sustainable Construction” has been developed. Explanatory factor analysis was performed first to determine the factor structure of the research scale. As a result of the explanatory factor analysis, information deficiency barrier, education disability barrier, high investment cost barrier, awareness barrier, academic inadequacy barrier, insufficient legal framework barrier, inadequate incentive barrier was identified as potential barriers to sustainable construction. The findings show that participants see the education and awareness barrier on sustainability as a higher level than investment costs compared to other factors. The results of this study; it is thought that it will make important contributions to the literature by revealing the factors that prevent sustainable practices in the Turkish Construction Industry and by enriching the developed scale with different and various factors in future studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİVİCİ, T. (2020). Potential Barriers to Sustainable Construction: A Model Proposal. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 440–449. https://ajindex.com/articles/780806

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. YEM,Türk Yapı Sektörü Raporu (Özet Rapor),Yapı-Endüstrisi Merkezi, (2010)
  2. Yorgancıoğlu P., “Sürdürülebilir Yapım Kavramının Uygulamaya Aktarılmasındaki Araç, Yöntem ve Yaklaşımlara İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme”, İTÜ Fen Bilimleri, Mimarlık Anabilim Dalı, Bina Yapım Yönetimi Programı, Y. Lisans Tezi, (2004), 1-128
  3. Paker B., Taş N., “Sürdürülebilir Yapım Sürecinde Mimarın Yapısal Atık Oluşumuna Etkisinin İrdelenmesi: Bursa Örneği”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Yalvaç Akademi Dergisi, 2 (1), (2017), 88-98
  4. Vyas S., Ahmed S. and Parashar A.,“BEE (Bureau of energy efficiency) and Green Buıldıngs, International Journal of Research, 1(3), (2014), 23-32
  5. Sev, A., Sürdürülebilir Mimarlık: Yem Yayın, İstanbul, (2009)
  6. Geçer E., Şentürk İ., Büyükgüngör H., “Yeşil Bina Tasarımında Su ve Enerji Yönetimi Üzerine Uygulama Örneği”, Güfbed 9 (2), (2019), 332-343
  7. Yılmaz M., Bakış A., “Sustainability in Construction Sector World Conference on Technology”, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, (2015 ), 2253 – 2262
  8. Willmott-Dixon Group, “The Impacts of Construction and the Built Environment”, Briefing Notes, (2010)
  9. Osuizugbo I., Oyeyipo O., Lahanmi A., Morakinyo A. Olaniyi O., “Barriers to the Adoption of Sustainable Construction”, European Journal of Sustainable Development 9 (2), (2020), 150-162
  10. Khalfan M., Noor M. Maqsood A., T., Alshanbri N., Sagoo A., “Perceptions towards Sustainable Construction amongst Construction Contractors in State of Victoria, Australia”. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(10), (2015), 940-947
  11. Gezen, A. F., “İnşaat Sektöründe Sürdürülebilir Kent Yaşamı ve Karayolunda Uygulama Alanları”, Beykent Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İnşaat Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, Tasarım ve Yapım Yönetimi Bilim Dalı, Y. Lisans Tezi, (2015), 1-131
  12. Al-Yami A. and Price, A. D. F., “Assessing the Feasibility of Using Value Management to Accelerate the İmplementation of Sustainability”, Proceeding of the 6th International Postgraduate Research Conference in the Built And Research Institute For The Built And Human Environment, 6-7th April, 1,. (2006),765-774
  13. Yavuz A., “Sürdürülebilirlik Kavramı ve İşletmeler Açısından Sürdürülebilir Üretim Stratejileri”, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(14), (2010), 63-86
  14. Davies O.O.A, Davies I.O.E, “Barriers to Implementation of Sustainable Construction Techniques”, MAYFEB Journal of Environ