Journals / Journal of Surgery and Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

The relationship between corrected QT interval and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Pages
158–162
Publication Date
2021-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The AUC value of NLR to predict in-hospital mortality was 0.711 (95% CI: 0.653-0.769; P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aim: In recent years, prolonged corrected QT (QTc) interval is thought to be an independent risk factor in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, 649 patients with ACS were enrolled from January 2017 to July 2019, out of which ninety-two patients died during follow-up.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The AUC value of NLR to predict in-hospital mortality was 0.711 (95% CI: 0.653-0.769; P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Systemic inflammation · early mortality · electrocardiography

Abstract

Background/Aim: In recent years, prolonged corrected QT (QTc) interval is thought to be an independent risk factor in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Our aim in this study is to determine whether there is a relationship between the Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), which is a new inflammatory parameter, and prolonged QTc corrected (QTc) interval in patients with ACS. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, 649 patients with ACS were enrolled from January 2017 to July 2019, out of which ninety-two patients died during follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups according to the prolonged QTc interval (QTc ≥450 msec). The relationship between QTc interval prolongation and NLR was evaluated. The primary endpoint was early all-cause death. Results: Thirty-one of 135 patients (22.9% P=0.002) with QTc interval prolongation and 61 of 514 patients without QTc prolongation (11.8% P=0.002) died. Prolonged QTc interval was positively correlated with NLR (r=0.20, P=0.001). Both NLR (OR: 1,016; 95% CI: 1.004–1.028; P=0.01) and QTc interval (OR: 1.016; 95% CI: 1.004–1.028; P=0.006) independently predicted early mortality. In the ROC curve analysis, the AUC value of QTc interval to predict in-hospital mortality was 0.680 (95% CI: 0.597-0.763; P=0.001), with a sensitivity of 35%, a specificity of 82% and an optimum cut-off value of ≥450 msec. The AUC value of NLR to predict in-hospital mortality was 0.711 (95% CI: 0.653-0.769; P

🔖

Cite This Article

INCİ, S. D., ERAT, M. (2021). The relationship between corrected QT interval and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 158–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/780074

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Smith JN, Negrelli JM, Manek MB, Hawes EM, Viera AJ. Diagnosis and Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Evidence-Based Update. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2015;28(2):283-93
  2. Jiménez-Candil J, Diego M, Cruz González IC, Matas J M G, Martín F, Pabón P, et al: Relationship between the QTc interval at hospital admission and the severity of the underlying ischaemia in low and intermediate risk people studied for acute chest pain. Int J Cardiol. 2008;126:84–9
  3. Lazzerini PE, Capecchi PL, Laghi-Pasini F. Long QT syndrome: an emerging role for inflammation and immunity. Front Cardiovasc Med 2015;2:26. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2015.00026
  4. Fiechter M, Ghadri JR, Jaguszewski M, Siddique A, Vogt S, Haller RB, et al. Effect of inflammation on adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2013;14(11):807-14
  5. Choi DH, Kobayashi Y, Nishi T, Kim HK, Ki YJ, Kim SS, et al. Combination of mean platelet volume and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts long-term major adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention. Angiology. 2019;70:345–51
  6. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Harvey D, Jaffe AS, Apple FS, Galvani M, et al. White on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2525–38
  7. Hamm C, Bassand JP, Agewall S, Bax J, Boersma E, Bueno H, et al. E SC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2999–3054
  8. Savonitto S, Ardissino D, Granger CB, Morando G, Prando MD, Mafrici A, et al. Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes. JAMA.1999;281:707
  9. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS, et al: AHA/ACC/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocadiogram part IV: The ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009