Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2016 / Sayı: 171

Gain-Based Public Procurement: An Assessment within the Framework of EU Countries

Kazanım Temelli Kamu Satın Alması: Avrupa Birliği Üyesi Ülkeler Çerçevesinde Bir Değerlendirme

Pages
55–80
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, in terms of activating the procurement cycle, life cycle costing has not yet become prevalent and only 15 EU member states have included environmental criteria in the technical specification phase.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Gain-based public procurement method is a type of strategic public procurement within the scope of the EU 2020 Strategy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accordingly, it has been seen that the proposal for the preparation of the National Action Plan in EU member states has made a significant contribution to the formation of the legal and political framework.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, in terms of activating the procurement cycle, life cycle costing has not yet become prevalent and only 15 EU member states have included environmental criteria in the technical specification phase.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Gain-based public procurement method is a type of strategic public procurement within the scope of the EU 2020 Strategy. Gain-based public procurement is the use of public purchasing power for the development of environment-friendly products/services and environment technology markets. In this study, success factors of the gain-based public procurement method are evaluated in the EU member states. Accordingly, it has been seen that the proposal for the preparation of the National Action Plan in EU member states has made a significant contribution to the formation of the legal and political framework. However, in terms of activating the procurement cycle, life cycle costing has not yet become prevalent and only 15 EU member states have included environmental criteria in the technical specification phase.

Özet

Kazanım temelli kamu satın alma yöntemi AB 2020 Stratejisi kapsamında ortaya çıkan stratejik kamu satın alması türlerinden biridir. Kazanım temelli satın alma kamunun satın alma gücünü çevreye duyarlı ürün ve hizmetler ile çevre teknolojileri piyasasının geliştirilmesi amacıyla kullanmasıdır. Çalışmada kazanım temelli satın alma yönteminin başarı unsurları AB üyesi ülkeler çerçevesinde değerlendirilmiştir. Buna göre AB üyesi ülkelerde Ulusal Eylem Planı hazırlanmasına ilişkin önerinin yasal ve politik çerçevenin oluşmasına önemli bir katkı sağladığı görülmüştür. Ancak satın alma sürecinin etkinleştirilmesi açısından yaşam döngüsü maliyetleme yönteminin henüz yaygınlık kazanmadığı ve sadece 15 AB üyesi ülkenin teknik şartname aşamasında çevre kriterlerine yer verdiği görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

İPEK, E. A. Ş., ACAR, İ. A. (2016). Gain-Based Public Procurement: An Assessment within the Framework of EU Countries. Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 171, 55–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/78005

References (8)

  1. ADELPHI (2010), Strategic Use of Public Procurement in Europe, Final Report to the EC, markt/2010/02/C. Brenton, J., Dawar, K. ve Kuntze, J.-C. (2011), Issues and Tensions in Public Procurement of Green Inno vation: A Cross-Countrt Study, CTEI Working Paper, CTEI-2011-09.
  2. Bouwer, M., Jonk,M., Berman T., Bersani, R., Lusser, H., Nappa, V., Nissinen, A., Parikka, K., Szuppinger, P. ve Vigano, C. (2006), Green Procurement in Europe 2006-Conclusions and Recommendations, Virage Millieu&Management bv., Korte Spaarne 31, 2011 AJ Haarlem, the Netherlands. CEPS-Centre for European Studies (2012), The Uptake of Green Public Procurement in the EU27, Brussels. Commission of the European Committees (2008), Public Procurement for a Better Environment, COM(2008)400 Final, Brussels. Day, C. (2005), "Buying Green: The Crucial Role of Public Authorities", Local Environment, April, 10(2), 201-209.
  3. European Commission (2010), Europe-2020-A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, Communication from the Commission, COM(2010) 2020
  4. Final. European Commission (2015), Study on "Strategic Use of Public Procurement in Promoting Green, Social and Innovation Policies", Final Report, December. European Commission (2016a), GPP National Action Plans, ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/action_plan_en.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 01.07.2016) European Commission (2016b), EU Public Procurement Directives, ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/eu_public_directives_en.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 01.07.2016) European Commission (2016c), Life-Cycle Costing, ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/lcc.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 01.07.2016)
  5. Handler, H. (2015), Strategic Public Procurement: An Overview, Policy Paper No. 28, November. Kamu İhale Kurumu (2016), "Türk Kamu Alımları Sistemi ve Kamu İhale Kanununda 5812 sayılı Kanunla Yapılan Değişiklikler", http://www.tepav.org.tr/upload/files/haber/1282137265- 2.Turk_Kamu_Alimlari_Sistemi_ve_Kamu_Ihale_Kanununda_Degisikli kler.pdf Li, L. ve Geiser, K. (2005), "Environmentally Responsible Public Procurement (ERPP) and Its Implications for Integrated Product Policy (IPP)", Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 705-715.
  6. Lundberg, S. ve Marklund, P.-O. (2012), "Green Public Procurement as an Environmental Policy Instrument: Cost-Effectiveness", http://www.usbe.umu.se/digitalAssets/103/103592_ues847.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 13.11.2016)
  7. Marron, D. (2003), "Greener Public Purchasing as an Environmental Policy Instrument", OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3(4), 71-105.
  8. OECD (2010), Survey on Public Procuremen