Journals / Journal of Surgery and Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

The risk of developing colorectal cancer in individuals aged 50-70 years and behavioral changes in high-risk individuals regarding a fecal occult blood test

Pages
14–19
Publication Date
2022-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: With the use of risk determination tools, individuals' lifestyle characteristics can be determined, and health education can be provided to change them.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aim: The prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is highly associated with its stage; therefore, it is important to determine the risk factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to determine the risks of getting CRC in individuals aged 50-70 years and the early diagnosis behaviors of individuals, who were deemed at high risk based on a Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: With the use of risk determination tools, individuals' lifestyle characteristics can be determined, and health education can be provided to change them.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Colorectal cancer · Fecal occult blood test · Stage of change

Abstract

Background/Aim: The prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is highly associated with its stage; therefore, it is important to determine the risk factors. Risk determination tools such as CRC-PRO are patient-friendly since they are non-invasive, and highly successful in predicting the cancer risk. This study aimed to determine the risks of getting CRC in individuals aged 50-70 years and the early diagnosis behaviors of individuals, who were deemed at high risk based on a Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT). Methods: This single-group quasi-experimental follow-up study was conducted in a family health center in Turkey between December 2016-December 2017. The data were collected using the “CRC Predicted Risk Online (CRC-PRO)” and “stages of change form.” The patients were educated at the risk determination stage. Along with telephone counseling conducted with individuals in the first and sixth months, the changes in FOBT were noted. Results: The CRC-PRO mean risk scores of the males and females were 1.37 (0.74), and 0.79 (0.40), respectively. Among them, 33.5% of males and 25.8% of females had a risk of CRC. After they were educated for FOBT, their behaviors positively and significantly changed from the risk determination stage until the 6th-month follow-up. Conclusion: With the use of risk determination tools, individuals' lifestyle characteristics can be determined, and health education can be provided to change them.

🔖

Cite This Article

DÖNMEZ, R. Ö., ÖZSOY, S., ARDAHAN, M. (2022). The risk of developing colorectal cancer in individuals aged 50-70 years and behavioral changes in high-risk individuals regarding a fecal occult blood test. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 14–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/779757

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
  2. Turkey Statistical Institute (TSI). Statistics of Death Cause, 2014. Available from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=18855. Accessed April 15, 2018
  3. Gao Z, Guo B, Gao R, Zhu Q, Qin H. Microbiota disbiosis is associated with colorectal cancer. Front Microbiol. 2015;6(20):1-9. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00020
  4. Kim DJ, Rockhill B, Colditz G A. Validation of the Harvard Cancer Risk Index: a prediction tool for individual cancer risk. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(4):332-40
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). What i s colorectal cancer screening? Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/basic_info/screening/. Accessed October 14, 2018
  6. Wells B J, Kattan MW, Cooper GS, Jackson L, Koroukian S. Colorectal cancer predicted risk online (CRC-PRO) calculator using data from the multi-ethnic cohort study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014;27(1):42-55. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.01.130040
  7. Wei EK, Colditz GA, Giovannucci EL, Fuchs CS, Rosner BA. Cumulative risk of colon cancer up to age 70 years by risk factor status using data from the nurses’ health study. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(7):863-72
  8. Yeoh EE, Botten RJ, Butters J, Di Matteo AC, Holloway RH, Fowler J. Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma: final results of phase III randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81(5):1271-8
  9. Ilgaz A, Gözüm S. Determination of colorectal cancer risk levels, colorectal cancer screening rates, and factors affecting screening participation of ındividuals working in agriculture in turkey. Cancer Nurs.2018;41(4):E46-54. doi: 10.1097/NCC.000000000000053
  10. Spring B, King AC, Pagoto SL, Van Horn L, Fisher JD. Fostering multiple healthy lifestyle behaviors for primary prevention of cancer. Am Psychol. 2015;70(2):75
  11. Muliira JK, D’Souza MS, Ahmed SM, Al-Dhahli SN, Al-Jahwari FRM. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in primary care settings: attitudes and knowledge of nurses and physicians. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol Nurs. 2016;3(1):98. doi: 10.4103/2347-5625.177391
  12. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more ıntegrative model of change. Psychotherapy. 1982;19(3):276-88
  13. Bui NC, Cho HN, Lee YY, Suh M,