Journals / Journal of Surgery and Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

New generation genome sequencing methods

Pages
503–506
Publication Date
2022-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In general, sequencing methods are separated as first-, second-, and third-generation sequencing methods, with the latter called ‘new-generation sequencing:’ our review focuses on these specific sequencing methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sequencing procedures, which present information related to events in the living metabolism, are performed by genetic methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Gene structure and genetic control mechanisms can be determined by sequencing methods, as they represent significant contributions to transcriptomic, ecological, and epidemiological studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In general, sequencing methods are separated as first-, second-, and third-generation sequencing methods, with the latter called ‘new-generation sequencing:’ our review focuses on these specific sequencing methods.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:DNA · Genome · New generation sequencing

Abstract

Sequencing procedures, which present information related to events in the living metabolism, are performed by genetic methods. Gene structure and genetic control mechanisms can be determined by sequencing methods, as they represent significant contributions to transcriptomic, ecological, and epidemiological studies. Thus, chromosomal abnormalities in living things with a whole genome analysis of different organisms (e.g., plants, bacteria, yeast, fungi, and viruses) are detected quickly, so that clinical disease can be diagnosed with reliable data from biomedical research. The nucleic acid sequencing processes have a history of about fifty years. With the technology developed in recent years, second and third-generation methods, known as next-generation sequencing (NGS), found their rightful place in the sector approximately 15 years ago. New-generation sequencing promotes inexpensive, routine, and comprehensive analyses of the living genome. In general, sequencing methods are separated as first-, second-, and third-generation sequencing methods, with the latter called ‘new-generation sequencing:’ our review focuses on these specific sequencing methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

KEKEÇ, I., SİPAHİ, N., İKİZ, S. (2022). New generation genome sequencing methods. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 503–506. https://ajindex.com/articles/779680

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Kizmaz MZ, Paylan İC, and Erkan S. Historical development of DNA sequencing. Gaziosmanpaşa University Gbad. 2017;6(2):47-53
  2. Darcan C, Türkyılmaz O. Overview of next generation sequencing technology. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University J of Sci. 2018;5(1):41–9
  3. McCombie WR, McPherson JD, Mardis ER. Next generation sequencing technologies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2019;9(11):a036798
  4. Ustek D, Abaci N, Sirma S, Cakiris A. New generation DNA sequencing. Experimed. 2011;1(1):11–8
  5. Akyol İ, Yildiz MA, Tutar E. Yeni nesil nükleotid dizileme metotlarının biyokimyasal temelleri. Tarim ve Doga Dergisi. 2017;20(1):1-15
  6. Liu L, Li Y, Li S, Hu N, He Y, Pong R, et al. Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:1-11. doi: 10.1155/2012/251364
  7. Kamps R, Brandão RD, Bosh BJ van den, Paulussen ADC, Xanthoulea S, Blok MJ, et al. Next-Generation sequencing in oncology: Genetic diagnosis, risk prediction and cancer classification. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18(2):308. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020308
  8. Dogan M, Eroz R, Yuce H, Ozmerdivenli R. The known about next-generation sequencing (NGS). Duzce Med J. 2017;19(1):27–30
  9. Kchouk M, Gibrat J, Elloumi M. Generations of sequencing technologies: from first to next generation. Biol Med. 2017;9(3):1-8. doi: 10.4172/0974-8369.1000395 10. Bruijns B, Tiggelaar R, Gardeniers H. Massively parallel sequencing techniques for forensics: a review. Electrophoresis. 2018;39(21):2642-54
  10. Kanagal-Shamanna R. Emulsion PCR. Techniques and Applications. Clinical applications of PCR. Humana Press, New York, NY. 2016;1392:33-42
  11. Verma V, Gupta A, Chaudhary VK. Emulsion PCR made easy. BioTechniques. 2020;69(1):64-9
  12. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(7):581-3
  13. Melamede RJ. U.S. Patent No. 4,863,849. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. 1989 15. Luo C, Tsementzi D, Kyrpides N, Read T, Konstantinidis KT. Direct comparisons of Illumina vs. Roche 454 sequencing technologies on the same microbial community DNA sample. PloS One. 2012;7(2):1-12
  14. White RA, Callister SJ, Moore RJ, Baker ES, Jansson JK. The past, present and future of microbiome analyses. Nat Protocols. 2016;11(11):2049-53
  15. Manley LJ, Ma D, Levine SS. Monitoring error rates in Illumina sequencing. Journal of biomolecular techniques: JBT. 2016;27(4):125
  16. Schirmer M, D’Amore R, Ij