SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Research in Business / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

BOARD STRUCTURES OF DEPOSIT BANKS OPERATING IN TURKEY AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP: A PANEL DATA ANALYSIS

TÜRKİYE’DE FAALİYET GÖSTEREN MEVDUAT BANKALARININ YÖNETİM KURULU YAPILARI VE FİNANSAL PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİ: BİR PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

Damla EKER
Pages
46–62
Publication Date
2022-06-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As the result of the analysis, a statistically significant relationship was found between independent, expert members and the financial performance of the bank.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine whether the structures of boards of banks affect financial performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, a panel data analysis was carried out using annual data from 2018 to 2020 of 16 deposit banks operating in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As the result of the analysis, a statistically significant relationship was found between independent, expert members and the financial performance of the bank.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kurumsal yönetim · yönetim kurulları · Türk bankacılık sektörü

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine whether the structures of boards of banks affect financial performance. In this context, a panel data analysis was carried out using annual data from 2018 to 2020 of 16 deposit banks operating in Turkey. The dependent variable as a financial performance indicator consists of return on equity and independent variables representing the board structures consist of independent members, expert members, and female members. As the result of the analysis, a statistically significant relationship was found between independent, expert members and the financial performance of the bank.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, bankaların yönetim kurulu yapılarının finansal performansları üzerinde etkisi olup olmadığını incelemektir. Bu bağlamda, Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren 16 mevduat bankasının 2018-2020 tarihlerini kapsayan yıllık verileri kullanılarak bir panel veri analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Finansal performans göstergesi olarak alınan bağımlı değişken öz sermaye kârlılığı; yönetim kurulu yapılarını temsil eden bağımsız değişkenler ise bağımsız üyeler, uzman üyeler ve kadın üyelerden oluşmaktadır. Analiz sonucunda, bağımsız üyeler ve uzman üyelerle banka finansal performansları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişkiler tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKER, D. (2022). BOARD STRUCTURES OF DEPOSIT BANKS OPERATING IN TURKEY AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP: A PANEL DATA ANALYSIS. Journal of Research in Business, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 46–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/778436

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Adams, Renée B. and Ferreira, D. (2007). A Theory of Friendly Boards. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217-250.
  2. Adams, Renée B. and Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in The Boardroom and Their İmpact on Governance and Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
  3. Almazan, A. and Suarez, J. (2003). Entrenchment and Severance Pay in Optimal Governance Structures. Journal of Finance 58(2), 519-547.
  4. Baltagi, Badi, H. (2013), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (3. Edition). England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Basuony, Mohamed A., Mohmed, Ehab K.A. and Al- Baidhani, Ahmed M. (2014). The Effect Of Corporate Governance On Bank Financial Performance: Evidence From the Arabian Peninsula. Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(2), 178-191.
  5. Beycan, M. (2013). Kurumsal Yönetim ve Türk Bankacılık Sektörü Üzerine Etkileri, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi SBE Doktora Tezi, İzmir.
  6. Cebeci Bhagat, S. ve Black, B. (1999). The Uncertain Relationship Between Board Composition and Firm Performance. Business Lawyer, 54(3), 921-963.
  7. BIS (2006). Enhancing Corporate Governance For Banking Organizations. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, February. Bourez, V. (2005), Womenonboards: Moving Beyond Tokenism. www.EuropeanPWN.net (Erişim Tarihi: 1.8.2018).
  8. Brancato, C. K. and Patterson, D. J. (1999). Board Diversity in U. S. Corporations: Best Practices for Broadening the Profile of Corporate Boards Research Report. 1230-99-RR, the Conference Board. Branson, D. (2006), No Seat at the Table: How Corporate Governance Keeps Women Out of America’s Boardrooms, New York University Press,
  9. New York. Carleton, W T., Nelson, J.M., Weisbach, M.S. (1998). The Influence of İnstitutions on Corporate Governance Through Private Negotiations: Evidence From TIAA-CREF. Journal of Finance 53, 1335-1362.
  10. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., and Simpson, W. G. (2003).
  11. Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33-53.
  12. Charitou, A., Louca, C., and Vafeas, N. (2007).
  13. Boards, Ownership Structure, And İnvoluntary Delisting From The New York Stock Exchange. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(2), 249-262.
  14. Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., and Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does One Size Fit All?. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 329-356.
  15. Eker, D. (2021). Yönetim Kurullarının Yapısı ve Firma Performansı: Borsa İstanbul’a Kayıtlı Firmalar Örneği. Yayımlanmış Doktora Tezi, KTÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Eker, D. ve Kurtaran, A. (2017). Bankaların Yönetim Kurullarındaki Cinsiyet Çeşitliliğ