Journals / Journal of Language Research / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

A Comparative Study on Polar Questions in Turkish and English: Realizing the Dichotomy While Teaching

Pages
26–37
Publication Date
2019-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was found that the coursebooks do not sufficiently practice negative polar questions for learners to raise awareness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the common instruments in daily communication, questions are categorized into three major groups in most of the languages: polar questions, wh- questions, and alternative questions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Contents of the coursebooks designed for the grades 5, 6, 7, and 8 were descriptively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was found that the coursebooks do not sufficiently practice negative polar questions for learners to raise awareness.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:polar questions · negative polar questions · teaching polar questions

Abstract

One of the common instruments in daily communication, questions are categorized into three major groups in most of the languages: polar questions, wh- questions, and alternative questions. When it is considered that the main purpose of teaching and learning a language is to communicate, it is expected for language learners to acquire good skills in exchanging information by asking and answering questions. In this context, polar questions should be paid close attention, as several studies revealed that the most frequently used question type in English spoken language is polar questions. However, it is argued that different answering systems for polar questions across languages cause language learners to have difficulties in learning how to answer polar questions appropriately, specifically, negative polar questions. Turkish and English languages employ different answering systems. Accordingly, Turkish learners of English must be aware of the differences and raise awareness on the issue to become proficient in the target language. Therefore, this study aims to explore the nature of the national coursebooks of English used in Turkey in terms of the activities they include related to polar questions. Contents of the coursebooks designed for the grades 5, 6, 7, and 8 were descriptively analyzed. As a result, it was found that the coursebooks do not sufficiently practice negative polar questions for learners to raise awareness. Based on the results, certain suggestions were proposed to enhance the quality of the coursebooks on the current topic.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYAR, A. C. (2019). A Comparative Study on Polar Questions in Turkish and English: Realizing the Dichotomy While Teaching. Journal of Language Research, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 26–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/777530

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Al-Hassaani, A. M. A. (2016). A Case Study of Question Formations of the Saudi EFL Lear-ners at Bisha University. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 54-64. doi:10.5539/elt.v9n5p54 Baytok, A. (2006). Kırgız Türkçesinde Evet/Hayır Soruları. Modern Türklük Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 78-99.
  2. Biber, D. & Johansson, S. & Leech, G. & Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, England: Longman. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Lear-ning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, U.K: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. Demircan, F., Akıskanlı G., Bereket, A., & Günay, F. (2019). İngilizce 6 Ders Kitabı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.
  3. Dinçer, S. (2018). Content Analysis in Scientific Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(1), 176-190. doi: 10.14686/buefad.363159 Dirgeyasa, I. W. (2017). Model Answers for Yes/No Questions from EFL Students in Public Senior High Schools. Studies in English Language and Education, 4(2), 235-246.
  4. Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Erdem, A. A., Balcı, T., & Özdil, K. D. (2019). İngilizce 7 Ders Kitabı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.
  6. Freed, A. F. (1994). The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 621–644. González-Fuente, S., Tubau, S., Espinal, M. T., & Prieto, P. (2015). Is there a universal answering strategy for rejecting negative propositions? Typological evidence on the use of prosody and gesture. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00899 Gruet-Skrabavola, H. (2016). Yes or no, or how to answer a negative question. Linguistica, 56(1), 127-142.
  7. Holmberg, A. (2013). The syntax of answers to polar questions in English and Swedish. Lingua, 128, 31–50. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.018 Holmberg, A. (2014). Answering Yes/No-Questions in English and Other Languages. The EFL Journal, 5(2), 23–42.
  8. Holmberg, A. (2016). The Syntax of Yes and No. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. İlter, B., İzgi, İ., Özdemir, E. Ç., Yeter, A. T., & Çavuşer Yünlü, Z. T. (2019). Mastermind İngilizce 8 Ders Kitabı. Ankara:
  10. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.
  11. Ji, X., Wang, X., & Li, A. (2009). Intonation patterns of yes-no questions for Chinese EFL learners. 2009 Oriental COCOSDA International Conference on Speech Database and Assessments. d