Journals / Journal of Surgery and Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux disease

Pages
102–105
Publication Date
2022-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, radiation exposure can be minimalized in clinical practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aim: The gold standard in the diagnosis of VUR (vesicoureteral reflux) is voiding cystouretrography (VCUG), but it is an invasive test with risk of radiation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: 760 kidneys of 380 patients were examined in this cohort study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, radiation exposure can be minimalized in clinical practice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ultrasonography · Voiding cystourethrography · Vesicoureteral reflux

Abstract

Background/Aim: The gold standard in the diagnosis of VUR (vesicoureteral reflux) is voiding cystouretrography (VCUG), but it is an invasive test with risk of radiation. The aim of the study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) of ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of VUR. Methods: 760 kidneys of 380 patients were examined in this cohort study. The patients were grouped by three age groups; 0-2, 3-5 and 6-17 years old. US reports included the data of anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter (APRPD), kidney parenchyma, kidney size, and the size of ureters. For all age groups, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were evaluated separately in two circumstances; APRPD is accepted pathologic when >5 mm and >10 mm. Results: A correlation was found between VCUG and US results in all age groups (P5 mm, sensitivity, specifity and NPV of US were 86.99%, 60.26% and 88.13% respectively, regardless of age. In contrast, when pathologic APRPD was >10 mm, sensitivity, specifity and NPV were 79.45%, 79.91% and 71.17%, respectively. Sensitivity and NPV of US were found highest in group of 0-2 age. Conclusion: If US are performed by radiologists experienced in the pediatric urinary system US and if it includes other parameters with APRPD, it will guide for VCUG in the diagnosis of VUR. Thus, radiation exposure can be minimalized in clinical practice.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, G. M., SIĞIRCI, A., ELMAS, A. T., TABEL, Y. (2022). The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux disease. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 102–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/777397

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adibi A, Gheysari A, Azhir A, Merikhi A, Khami S, Tayari N. Value of Sonography in the Diagnosis of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2013;24(2):297-302. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.109582
  2. Lim R. Vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infection: Evolving practices and current controversies in pediatric imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;92(5):1197-208. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2187
  3. Roberts KB. Urinary tract infection: clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of the initial UTI in febrile infants and children 2 to 24 months. Pediatrics. 2011;128(3):595-610. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1330
  4. Nguyen HT, Benson CB, Bromley B, Jampbell JB, Chow C, Coleman B, et al. Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(6):982–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.002 5. Onen A. An alternative grading system to refine the criteria for severity of hydronephrosis and optimal treatment guidelines in neonates with primary UPJ-type hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol. 2007;3(3):200–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.08.002
  5. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: Introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol. 1993;23(6):478–80. doi: 10.1007/BF02012459
  6. Davey MS, Zerin JM, Reilly C, Ambrosius WT. Mild renal pelvic dilatation is not predictive of vesicoureteral reflux in children. Pediatr Radiol. 1997;27(12):908–11. doi: 10.1007/s002470050268
  7. Lebowitz RL, Olbing H, Parkkulainen KV, Smellie JM, Tamminen-Mobius TE. International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux. International Reflux Study in Children. Pediatr Radiol. 1985;15(2):105–9. doi.org/10.1007/bf02388714
  8. Nafisi-Moghadam R, Malek M, Najafi F, Shishehsaz B. The Value of Ultrasound in Diagnosing Vesicoureteral Reflux in Young Children with Urinary Tract Infection. Acta Med Iran. 2011;49(9):588-91. PMID: 22052149
  9. Szymanski KM, Oliveira LM, Silva A, Retik AB, Nguyen HT. Analysis of indications for ureteral reimplantation in 3738 children with vesicoureteral reflux: a single institutional cohort. J Pediatr Urol. 2011;7(6):601–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.06.002
  10. Massanyi EZ, Preece J, Gupta A, Lin SM, Wang MH. Utility of screening ultrasound after first febrile UTI among patients with clinically significant vesicoureteral reflux. Urology. 2013;82(4):905e9