Journals / Journal of Surgery and Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of manual and automatic cell count methods for synovial fluid: A prospective study

Pages
98–101
Publication Date
2022-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a significant positive correlation between BFM and MC in WBC counts (r=0.633, P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aim: Cell count measurement methods in the synovial fluid are still a current problem in orthopedic practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The WBC and RBC count in the synovial fluid of 43 patients undergoing gonarthrosis surgery were determined by a Mindray BC-6800 hematology analyzer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a significant positive correlation between BFM and MC in WBC counts (r=0.633, P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Synovial fluid · Hematology analyzer · Cell count

Abstract

Background/Aim: Cell count measurement methods in the synovial fluid are still a current problem in orthopedic practice. Knowing the cell count in the synovial fluid is important for the assessment of a variety of orthopedic and rheumatologic diseases. We aimed to assess the correlation of WBC and RBC results obtained with a complete blood count analyzer with that obtained by a manual cell count. Methods: The WBC and RBC count in the synovial fluid of 43 patients undergoing gonarthrosis surgery were determined by a Mindray BC-6800 hematology analyzer. The study groups were defined as manual cell count (MC), hemogram mode (HM), and body fluid mode (BFM). All samples were analyzed twice consecutively, and the mean results were calculated. Cell counting was performed using different methods in the same samples and compared statistically. Results: The mean age of the patients was 60.9 years, and there were 17 males (39.5%) and 26 females (60.5%). The WBC and RBC counts in the synovial fluid samples were determined using manual cell count, and the HM and BFM on a Mindray BC-6800 automatic hematology analyzer. WBC counts significantly differed between MC and BFM, and RBC counts significantly differed between HM-MC and HM-BFM (P=0.001, P=0.001, P=0.001, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation between BFM and MC in WBC counts (r=0.633, P

🔖

Cite This Article

ALIÇ, T., ŞAHİN, M., SAVCI, Ü., ÇALBIYIK, M., KAYADİBİ, H. (2022). Comparison of manual and automatic cell count methods for synovial fluid: A prospective study. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 98–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/777376

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Buoro S, Seghezzi M, Manenti B, Mecca T, Candiago E, Vidali M, et al. Reliability of automated synovial fluid cell counting with Mindray BC-6800 body fluid mode. International journal of laboratory hematology. 2017;39(3):337–46
  2. Sternbach GL, Baker FJ. The emergency joint: arthrocentesis and synovial fluid analysis. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians. 1976;5(10):787-92
  3. Cho J, Oh J, Lee SG, Lee YH, Song J, Kim JH. Performance Evaluation of Body Fluid Cellular Analysis Using the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800, Sysmex XN-350, and UF-5000 Automated Cellular Analyzers. Annals of laboratory medicine. 2020;40(2):122-30
  4. Sandhaus LM. Body fluid cell counts by automated methods. Clinics in laboratory medicine. 2015;35(1):93-103
  5. Fleming C, Russcher H, Lindemans J, de Jonge R. Clinical relevance and contemporary methods for counting blood cells in body fluids suspected of inflammatory disease. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2015;53(11):1689-706
  6. Karataş Ö, Tuncer T. Pseudo-septic arthritis developed after hyaluronic acid injection: A case report. J Surg Med. 2019;3(3):278-9
  7. Fuster O, Andino B, Pardo A, Laiz B. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, ascitic and pleural body fluids evaluation with the Mindray BC-6800 hematology analyzer. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 2018;32(2):e22240
  8. Pascual E, Batlle-Gualda E, Martínez A, Rosas J, Vela P. Synovial fluid analysis for diagnosis of intercritical gout. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1999;131(10):756-9
  9. Abdullah S, Young-Min, SA, Hudson SJ, Kelly CA, Heycock CR, Hamilton JD. Gross synovial fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of joint effusion. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2007;60(10):1144-7
  10. Brown W, Keeney M, Chin-Yee I, Johnson K, Lantis K, Finn W, et al. Validation of body fluid analysis on the Coulter LH 750. Laboratory Hematology: Official Publication of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology. 2003;9(3):155-9
  11. Punzi L, Oliviero F. Arthrocentesis and synovial fluid analysis in clinical practice: value of sonography in difficult cases. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009;1154(1):152-8
  12. Walker TJ, Nelson LD, Dunphy BW, Anderson DM, Kickler TS. Comparative evaluation of the Iris iQ200 body fluid module with manual hemacytometer count. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2009;131(3):333-8
  13. De Smet D, Van Moer G, Martens GA, Nanos N, Smet L, Jochmans K, et al. Use of the Cell-Dyn Sap