Journals / Journal of Innovations in Civil Engineering and Technology / 2021 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

The Characterization of Crushed Natural Stone Aggregates

Kırılmış Doğal Taş Agregaların Karakterizasyonu

Pages
55–77
Publication Date
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Test results show that crushed marble concrete has the highest workability, followed by crushed basalt and crushed andesite aggregates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Marble and volcanic rocks are a widespread aggregate resource and are increasingly being used in concrete constructions worldwide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Water absorption, material finer than 63 µm, Los Angeles abrasion test, Mg2SO4 soundness, and alkali-silica reaction indicate that andesite aggregate is of lower quality than basalt marble aggregates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Test results show that crushed marble concrete has the highest workability, followed by crushed basalt and crushed andesite aggregates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Beton · Agrega · Doğal taş

Abstract

Marble and volcanic rocks are a widespread aggregate resource and are increasingly being used in concrete constructions worldwide. This paper presents a study's results to compare the properties of concretes prepared with marble, andesite, and basalt used as aggregates. Three aggregate types were supplied locally from three different areas in Turkey. Chemical, petrographic, and mineralogical analysis was carried out on all these samples. A variety of laboratory tests determined the physical and mechanical properties of all aggregates. Water absorption, material finer than 63 µm, Los Angeles abrasion test, Mg2SO4 soundness, and alkali-silica reaction indicate that andesite aggregate is of lower quality than basalt marble aggregates. Test results show that crushed marble concrete has the highest workability, followed by crushed basalt and crushed andesite aggregates.

Özet

Mermer ve volkanik kayaçlar yaygın bir agrega kaynağıdır ve dünya çapında beton yapılarda giderek daha fazla kullanılmaktadır. Bu makalede agrega olarak kullanılan mermer, andezit ve bazaltın karakterizasyonu amacıyla hazırlanmıştır. Türkiye'deki üç farklı bölgeden üç agrega türü tedarik edilmiştir. Tüm bu numuneler üzerinde kimyasal, petrografik ve mineralojik analizler yapılmıştır. Çeşitli laboratuvar testleri ile tüm agregaların fiziksel ve mekanik özellikleri belirlenmiştir. Su emme, 63 µm'den az malzeme, Los Angeles aşınma testi, Mg2SO4 sağlamlığı ve alkali-silika reaksiyonu, andezit agregasının bazalt mermer agregalarından daha düşük kalitede olduğunu göstermektedir. Test sonuçları, kırılmış mermer agregaların en yüksek beton işlenebilirliğine sahip olduğunu, ardından kırılmış bazalt ve andezit agregalarının geldiğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, M. Y., AKBULUT, H., ŞAHBAZ, A. (2021). The Characterization of Crushed Natural Stone Aggregates. Journal of Innovations in Civil Engineering and Technology, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 55–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/777232

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Al-Oraimi, S.K., Taha, R., Hassan, H.F. (2006) The effect of the mineralogy of coarse aggregate on the mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Constr Build Mater, 20:499–503
  2. Alonso, E., Martínez, L., Martínez, W., Villaseñor, L. (2002) Mechanical properties of concrete elaborated with igneous aggregates. Cement Concr Res, 32:317–321 ASTM C 597 (2002) Standard test method for pulse velocity through concrete. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Vol. 04.02. West Conshohocken, PA. ASTM C 1260-94 (1997) Standard test method for potential alkali reactivity of aggregates, Annual Book of ASTM Standards; Section Concrete and Mineral Aggregates, Philadelphia Black, P.M. (2005) Andesites as resources for roading and concrete industries, North Island of New Zealand. Proceedings of the 2005 New Zealand Minerals Conference, pp 328-338,
  3. Crown Minerals, Ministry of Economic Development, and the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, New Zealand Branch. Donza, H., Cabrera, O., Irassar, E.F. (2002) High-strength concrete with different fine aggregate. Cement Concr Res, 32:1755–1761
  4. El-Dash, K.M., Ramadan, M.O. (2006) Effect of aggregate on the performance of confined concrete. Cement Concr Res, 36:599 – 605 Etxeberria, M., Mari, A.R., Va´zquez, E. (2007) Recycled aggregate concrete as structural material. Mater Struct, 40:529–541
  5. Ikeda, T., Kawabata, Y., Hamada, H., Sagawa, Y. (2008) Alkali-silica reactivity of andesite in NaCl saturated solution. International Conference on Durability of Concrete Structures (ICDCS 2008): 26-27 November 2008:
  6. Hangzhou, China p1-8 Kawabata, Y., Yamada, K., Matsushita, H. (2007) Petrological study on evaluating of alkali-silica reactivity and expansion analysis of andesite. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu E, 63:689-703
  7. Kılıç, A., Atiş, C.D., Teymen, A., Karahan, O., Özcan, F., Bilim, C., Özdemir, M. (2008) The influence of aggregate type on the strength and abrasion resistance of high strength concrete. Cement Concr Res, 30 (4):290-296
  8. Korkanç, M., Tugrul, A. (2004) Evaluation of selected basalts from Niğde, Turkey, as source of concrete aggregates. Eng Geol, 75:291–307
  9. Lamond, J.F., Pielert, J.H. (2006) Significance of tests and properties of concrete and concrete-making materials. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 337-354.
  10. Le Bas, M.J., Streckeisen, A.L. (1991) The IUGS systematics of igneous rocks, Journal of the Geological Society, London, 148:825-833
  11. Le Bas, M.J., Le Maitre, R.W., Woolley, A.R. (1992) T