SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Mediastinal lymphnode positivity clinical scoring system for lung adenocarsinoma-mediastinal lymph node evaluation and staging

İsmail AĞABABAOĞLU
Ozgur Omer YİLDİZ
Dilek YAPAR
Hasan ERSÖZ
Seray HAZER
Özant HELVACI
Selim Şakir Erkmen GÜLHAN
Nurettin KARAOGLANOGLU
Pages
831–838
Publication Date
2022-05-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The low FDG affinity in the lepidic pattern was statistically significant in the study (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The study-cohort aims to assess PET-CT's correlation with adenocarcinomas' subtypes and propose a scoring system for mediastinal lymph nodes staging.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: The patient cohort is a multicenter, retrospective analysis of 268 patient that underwent surgery for NSCLC adenocarcinoma.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The low FDG affinity in the lepidic pattern was statistically significant in the study (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lung Cancer · Adenocarcinomas · Mediastinal Staging

Abstract

Aim: The study-cohort aims to assess PET-CT's correlation with adenocarcinomas' subtypes and propose a scoring system for mediastinal lymph nodes staging. Material and Method: The patient cohort is a multicenter, retrospective analysis of 268 patient that underwent surgery for NSCLC adenocarcinoma. Preoperative PET-CT results for mediastinal lymph node staging was pathologically confirmed on tissue specimens obtained at anatomical resection. Statistical evaluation of PET CT, radiological and pathological outcomes were performed on all subgroups. Results: The low FDG affinity in the lepidic pattern was statistically significant in the study (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AĞABABAOĞLU, İ., YİLDİZ, O. O., YAPAR, D., ERSÖZ, H., HAZER, S., HELVACI, Ö., GÜLHAN, S. Ş. E., KARAOGLANOGLU, N. (2022). Mediastinal lymphnode positivity clinical scoring system for lung adenocarsinoma-mediastinal lymph node evaluation and staging. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 831–838. https://ajindex.com/articles/776555

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Hochhegger B, Alves GR, Irion KL, et al. PET/CT imaging in lung cancer: indications and findings. J Bras Pneumol 2015 May-Jun; 41: 264-74.
  2. Zhao L, He ZY, Zhong XN, Cui ML. (18)FDG-PET/CT for detection of mediastinal nodal metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 2012; 21: 230-6.
  3. Schmidt-Hansen M, Baldwin DR, Hasler E, Zamora J, Abraira V, Roqué I Figuls M. PET-CT for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients with suspected resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014(11): CD009519. Sara V, Jason MA, Angela T, Adam P, Giuseppe A, Aman SC. The role of positron emission tomography in the diagnosis, staging and response assessment of non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6: 95. Erasmus JJ, Macapinlac HA. Low-sensitivity FDG-PET studies: less common lung neoplasms. Semin Nucl Med 2012; 42: 255-60.
  4. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6: 244-85.
  5. Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11: 39-51.
  6. Mountain CF, Dresler CM. Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging. Chest 1997; 111: 1718-23.
  7. Hamacher K, Coenen HH, Stöcklin G. Efficient stereospecific synthesisof no-carrier-added 2-(18F)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose using aminopolyether supported nucleophilic substitution. J Nucl Med 1986; 27: 235-8.
  8. Öztaş S, Öztürk AV,Acartürk E, et al. The role of tumor SUVmax/lymph node SUVmax ratio viewed on PET-CT in the detection of mediastinal metastasis in patients with lung cancer. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2012; 20: 544-51. Obuchowski NA. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 2003; 229: 3–8. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 1978; 8: 283–98.
  9. Böhning D, Holling H, Patilea V. A limitation of the diagnostic-odds ratio in determining an optimal cut-off value for a continuous diagnostic test. Stat Methods Med Res 2011; 20: 541-50.
  10. Zogheib E, Cosse C, Sabbagh C, et al. Biological scoring system for early prediction of acute bowel ischemia after cardiac surgery: the PALM score. Ann Intensive Care 2018; 8: 46. Groheux D, Quere G, Bla