Journals / Artuklu Akademi / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Prophets and Physical Defects (A Theological Comparative Study between Sunnies and Mu'tazila)

Peygamberlerde Bulunmayan Biyolojik Kusurlar (Sünnî ve Mutezilî Kelamına Dair Bir Araştırma)

Pages
149–169
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The paper attempts to answer these questions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:God has created Man and guided him through his Messengers so thatMan is not left to the hesitations and volatilities of his intellect.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Messengerswere human chosen from among the best so that people could accept them andhad no pretext not to follow their path.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The paper attempts to answer these questions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İsmet · Tiksindiren Hastalıklar · Mutezile

Abstract

God has created Man and guided him through his Messengers so thatMan is not left to the hesitations and volatilities of his intellect. The Messengerswere human chosen from among the best so that people could accept them andhad no pretext not to follow their path. Being human, Messengers had the samehuman needs like food, drink and marriage. They were also exposed to sicknessand death. However, the question is whether Messengers could suffer fromdiseases such as leprosy and effect that such disease would have on theirmission as Messengers of God. Would infallibility include protection from suchcontagious and repulsive diseases? Is there a difference between the Sunnis andMu'tazila's on this issue? The paper attempts to answer these questions.

Özet

Allah insanları yaratmış ve sadece akıllarına dayanarak şaşkın bir şekilde

🔖

Cite This Article

ALKHATTAF, H. (2017). Prophets and Physical Defects (A Theological Comparative Study between Sunnies and Mu'tazila). Artuklu Akademi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 149–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/77612

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Adevî, Ahmed b. Muhammed, el-Haritetü’l-Behiyye fi İlmi’t-Tevhîd, tah. Abdusselam b. Abdulhadi Şennar, Beyrut-Dimeşk 2004. Buhârî, Ebû A bdillâh M uhammed b. İ smâîl b. İ brâhîm e l-Cu‘fî el-Buhârî, Sahîhü’l-Buhârî, tah. Muhammed Zuheyr b. Nasır en-Nasır, 1. Baskı, Dârü’s-Selâm, Riyâd 1999. Kurtubî, Ebû Abdillâh Muhammed b. Ahmed b. Ebî Bekr b. Ferh, Tefsîru’l- Kurtûbî, tah. Ahmed el-Berdûnî- İbrahim Ateş, Daru’l-Kutubi’l- Mısriyye, Kahire tsz. Keylânî, Muhammed Edip, Avnü’l-Murîd li Şerh-I evherü’t-Tevhîd, Daru’l- Beşair, 2. Baskı, Dimeşk 1999. Kirmânî, Muhammed b. Yûsuf, el-Kevâkibü’d-Dürârî fi Şerhi’l-Buhârî, Dâru İhyai’t-Türasi’l-Arebî, Beyrut-Lübnan 1937. Lâî, Hüseyn b. Muhammed b. Saîd el-Mağribî, el-Bedrü’t-Tihâm Şerhu Bulûği’l-Merâm, tah. Ali b. Abdullah ez-Zîn, Daru Hicr. y.y. tsz. Nevevî, Ebû Zekeriya Yahya b. Şeref b. Mürî, Riyazu’s-Sâlihîn, Daru İbn Kesir, 1. Baskı, Dimeşk-Beyrut 2007. Râzî, Ebu Abdillâh (Ebü'l-Fazl) Fahrüddîn Muhammed b. Ömer b. Hüseyn, Tefsîru’r-Râzî, Daru İhyai’t-Turasi’l-Arabi, 3. Baskı, Beyrut tsz. Suyûtî, Ebü’l-Fazl Celâlüddîn Abdurrahmân b. Ebî Bekr b. Muhammed el- Hudayrî, ed-Durrü’l-Mensûr Fi’Tefsîri’l-Me’sûr, Daru’l-Fıkr, Beyrut tsz. Türkmen, Hasan, “Ahbari-Usuli Ayrışmasında Sehvu'n-Nebi Meselesi”, İslami Araştırmalar Dergisi, 25/1, 2015.
  2. Ünverdi, Veysi, “Mu'tezile'de Peygamberlerin İsmeti”, Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, c. 15, sy. 1, 2015.
  3. Zuhayli, Vehbe, et-Tefsîru’l-Munîr Fi’l-Akîdeti ve’ş-Şerîati ve’l-Menheci, Daru’l- Fikri’l-Muasır, 2. Baskı, Dimeşk 1418.