SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Artuklu Akademi / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Mu’tazila’s Faith System; Usûl-i Hamse/Five Principles and Background

Mu’tezile’nin İnanç Sistemi; Usûl-i Hamse/Beş İlke ve Arka Planı

Veysi ÜNVERDİ
Pages
1–28
Publication Date
2017-12-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, this article is the product of an effort totake a closer look at religious discourse which is not distant to political contextand is woven with reason, philosophy and justice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mu’tazila, a founding school of Islamic thought, has frequentlyspoken in every period by its distinctive kalam system, rationalist, libertarianand inquisitive religious discourse and the original language it uses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mu’tazila,that systematically revealed the belief field for the first time, declared the beliefsystem in five essentials.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, this article is the product of an effort totake a closer look at religious discourse which is not distant to political contextand is woven with reason, philosophy and justice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mu’tezile · Beş Esas · Usûl-i Hamse

Abstract

Mu’tazila, a founding school of Islamic thought, has frequentlyspoken in every period by its distinctive kalam system, rationalist, libertarianand inquisitive religious discourse and the original language it uses. Mu’tazila,that systematically revealed the belief field for the first time, declared the beliefsystem in five essentials. These principles, known as Usul-i hamse, are almostidentical to Mu’tazila.Usûl-i hamse are the main points that Mu’tazila differentiates from the Ahlas-Sunnah in terms of religious interpretation. These principles are not merelyprinciples of religious justification and content. On the contrary, these principles,which have emerged under a number of socio-political factors, also have anumber of political aspects. Knowing the background of these essentials canlead to better understanding of the form of Mu’tazilite thought. For this reason,our article is based on a thorough analysis of these five essentials. In the study,the religious discourse of Mu’tazila was analyzed along with the content andbackground of the five essentials. Thus, this article is the product of an effort totake a closer look at religious discourse which is not distant to political contextand is woven with reason, philosophy and justice.

Özet

İslâm düşüncesinin kurucu bir okulu olan Mu’tezile, ortaya koyduğu kelâm

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNVERDİ, V. (2017). Mu’tazila’s Faith System; Usûl-i Hamse/Five Principles and Background. Artuklu Akademi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 1–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/77594

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abdeh, Muhammed-Abdulhalîm Tarık, el-Mu’tezile beyne’l-Kadîm ve’l-Hadîs, Dârü’l-Erkam, Birmingham 1987.
  2. Abdülhamid, İrfan, İslâm’da İtikadi Mezhepler ve Akâid Esasları, trc. M. Saim Yeprem, Marifet Yay., İstanbul 1994.
  3. Alpyağıl, Recep, Din Felsefesi Açısından Mu’tezile Gelen-Ek-i, İz Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2014. Ammâra, Muhammed, Mu’tezile ve Devrim, trc. İbrâhîm Akbaba, İstanbul 1988. _____,Mu’tezile’de İnsanın Özgürlüğü, trc. Vahdettin İnce, İstanbul 1998. Amracî, A. Şevkî İbrâhîm, el-Mu’tezile fî Bağdad ve Eserihim fi’l-Hayati’l- Fikriyyeti ve’s-Siyaseti, Mektebetü Madbulî, Kahire 2000.
  4. Ay, Mahmut, “Kelâmda Adalet, Kudret ve Hikmet Bağlamında Tanrı Tasavvurları”, Eskiyeni, 2015, sayı: 31, ss. 25-50. _____,Mu’tezile ve Siyaset, Pınar Yayınları, İstanbul 2002.
  5. Aydınlı, Osman, Akılcı Din Söylemi, Hitit Kitap, Ankara 2010. _____, “Mu’tezile Ekolü Teşekkülü, İlkeleri ve İslâm Düşüncesine Katkıları”, Marife, 2003, sayı: 3, ss. 27-54. _____, İslâm Düşüncesinde Aklîleşme Süreci, Ankara Okulu Yayınları, Ankara 2013.
  6. Aytepe, Mahsum, “Mu’tezile Kelâmında Ötekine Ulaşma Kaygısı Olarak Emr-i bi’l-Maruf Neyh-i ani’l-Münker İlkesi”, Mukaddime, Mardin 2017, c. 8, sayı: 1, ss. 83-97. Bâkıllânî, Kitâbu’t-Temhîd, nşr. İ. Ahmed Haydar, Beyrut 1987. Bedevî, Abdurrahman, Mezâhibü’l-İslâmiyyîn, Beyrut: 1997. Belhî, Ebû’l-Kâsım, Zikrü’l-Mu’tezile, nşr. Fuâd Seyyid, Tunus 1393. Cârullah, Zühdî, el-Mu’tezile, Beyrut 1974.
  7. Cengiz, Yunus, Mu’tezile’de Eylem Teorisi, Düşün Yay., İstanbul 2012. Cüveynî, Kitâbü’l-İrşâd, nşr. M. Yusuf Musa-A. Abdulmünim Abdulhamid, Mısır 1950.
  8. Çağrıcı, Mustafa, “el-Emru bi’l-Maruf ve’n-Nehyu ani’l-Münker”, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi, TDV Yay., Ankara 1995, c. 11, ss. 138-141.
  9. Çelebi, İlyas, “Menzile beyne’l-Menzileteyn”, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi, TDV Yay., Ankara 2004, c. 29, ss. 161-162. _____, “Mu’tezile”, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi, TDV Yay., Ankara 2006, c. 31, ss. 391-401. _____, İslâm İnanç Sisteminde Akılcılık ve Kâdî Abdülcebbâr, Rağbet Yayınları, İstanbul 2002. _____, Şerhu’l-Usûli’l-Hamse Tercümesi, Türkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Başkanlığı, İstanbul 2013.
  10. Dertli, Yahya, Kur’an’ı Kerim’in İyiliği Emretme ve Kötülükten Kaçındırma İlkesinin Mu’tezile Düşüncesindeki Kullanım Alanı, (Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Kahramanmaraş 2006.
  11. Dugaym, Semih, Felsefetü’l-Kader fi Fikri’l-Mu’tezile, Dâru’l-Fikri’l-Lübnânî, Beyrut 1996. Eş’arî, Ebû’l-Hasen, Makalatü’l-İslâmiyyin ve İhtilafu’l-Musallin, nşr. Helmut