SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Biotechnology and Strategic Health Research / 2020 / COVID-19 Özel Sayı

Community Behavior and Health Literacy in Outbreaks

Salgınlarda Toplum Davranışı ve Sağlık Okuryazarlığı

Seçil ÖZKAN
Hakan TÜZÜN
Asiye UĞRAŞ DİKMEN
Mustafa Necmi İLHAN
Pages
105–110
Publication Date
2020-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

During the epidemic, the effect of health literacy was mentioned in the success of crisis communication.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In outbreaks, human behavioral responses have been shown to affect social outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For emergency intervention, it is important to integrate approaches and interventions based on public science.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:During the epidemic, the effect of health literacy was mentioned in the success of crisis communication.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:salgın · toplum davranışı · sağlık iletişimi

Abstract

In outbreaks, human behavioral responses have been shown to affect social outcomes. For emergency intervention, it is important to integrate approaches and interventions based on public science. The perception and implementation of interventions by the community is closely related to the level of health literacy of individuals. In this review, individual behavior models and effective factors were examined in outbreaks. During the epidemic, the effect of health literacy was mentioned in the success of crisis communication.

Özet

Salgınlarda, insanların davranışsal tepkilerinin toplumsal sonuçları etkilediği görülmüştür. Acil müdahale için toplum bilimlerine dayalı yaklaşımları ve müdahaleleri entegre etmek önemlidir. Müdahalelerin toplum tarafından algılanması ve uygulanması ise bireylerin sağlık okuryazarlığı düzeyi ile yakından ilişkilidir. Bu derlemede salgınlarda birey davranış modelleri ve etkili faktörler incelenmiştir. Salgın esnasında uygulana kriz iletişiminin başarısında sağlık okuryazarlığının etkisine değinilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, S., TÜZÜN, H., DİKMEN, A. U., İLHAN, M. N. (2020). Community Behavior and Health Literacy in Outbreaks. Journal of Biotechnology and Strategic Health Research, COVID-19 Özel Sayı, 105–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/774499

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. World Health Organization What is a pandemic? World Health Organization https://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/frequently_asked_questions/pandemic/en/. Accessed 7.4.2020 2. World Health Organization Risk communication World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/risk-communication/socialnet/en/. Accessed 7.4.2020 3.Ilona Kickbusch, Jürgen M. Pelikan, Franklin Apfel & Agis D. Tsouros. Eds. Health literacy: the solid facts. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. 2013 4. Norman P, Boer H, Seydel ER: Protection Motivation Theory. In Predicting health behaviour Edited by: Conner M, Norman P. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press
  2. Champion VL, Skinner CS: The Health Belief Model. In Health behaviour and health education
  3. theory, research, and practice Edited by: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass
  4. Witte K: Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the EPPM to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In The handbook of communication and emotion Edited by: Andersen PA, Guerrero LK. New York: Academic Press
  5. Weinstein ND, Sandman PM, Blalock SJ: The Precaution Adoption ProcessModel. InHealthbehaviourandhealtheducation
  6. theory,research, and practice Edited by: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass
  7. De Hoog N, Stroebe W, de Wit JBF: The impact of vulnerability to and severity of a health risk on processing and acceptance of fear-arousing communications:Ameta-analysis. ReviewofGeneralPsychology 2007, 11:258-285. 9. Ruiter RAC, Abraham C, Kok G: Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology & Health 2001, 16:613-630. 10. Markel H, Lipman HB, Navarro JA, Sloan A, Michalsen JR, Stren AM, Cetron MS: Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented by US cities during the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic. JAMA 2007, 298:644-654. 11. Bish A., Michie S., Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review, British Journal of Health Psychology 15(Pt 4):797-824 · November 2010, British Journal of Health Psychology 15(Pt 4):797-824 · November 2010 Doi:10.1348/135910710X485826 12. Lau JT, Tsui H, Lau M, Yang X., SARS transmission, risk factors, and prevention in Hong Kong., Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Apr
  8. 10(4):587-92. 13. Leung et al. The epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome in the 2003 Hong Kong epidemic: an analysis of all 1755 patients. Ann Int