Journals / Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Hazardous Waste Management in Turkey

Pages
312–318
Publication Date
2019-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These efforts will greatly aid decision makers such as municipal authorities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An increase in population, energy demand, industrial activities and other technological developments inevitably cause large amount of waste to be produced.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Any deficiency in the management of hazardous wastes, which constitute a significant part of solid wastes, has a range of negative effects for environmental health and safety.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These efforts will greatly aid decision makers such as municipal authorities.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:hazardous waste · waste generation

Abstract

An increase in population, energy demand, industrial activities and other technological developments inevitably cause large amount of waste to be produced. It is a known fact that traditional methods for the collection, transportation and disposal of wastes are not capable anymore to prevent health problems and economic losses. Any deficiency in the management of hazardous wastes, which constitute a significant part of solid wastes, has a range of negative effects for environmental health and safety. The aim of this study is to assess the situation of hazardous solid-waste management in Turkey. This was achieved by reviewing the rates of waste generation across the country. Current requirements and challenges in hazardous waste management are also discussed, and suggestions for solving problems are presented. The study results that the Kocaeli and Izmir, as the two cities with the larger population and industrial activities of Turkey, produces the largest amount of hazardous waste in Turkey. On the other side, Istanbul, which is the mostly populated city with advanced health service, is by far the largest medical waste producer across the country. This is followed by Ankara, the capital city of Turkey and Izmir. Although hazardous waste management in Turkey has improved because of a strong governance and institutional involvement in recent years, efforts directed by scientific research are still required to enable robust waste management. These efforts will greatly aid decision makers such as municipal authorities.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, N. (2019). Hazardous Waste Management in Turkey. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 312–318. https://ajindex.com/articles/773728

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akkoyunlu, A., Avsar, Y. and Erguven, G.O. (2017). “Hazardous Waste Management in Turkey”. Journal of Hazardous Toxic and Radioactive Waste 21(4). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000373 Alagoz, B. A. Z. & Kocasoy, G. (2007). Treatment and disposal alternatives for health-care waste in developing countries - a case study in Istanbul, Turkey. Waste Management & Research 25(1): 83-89.
  2. Alagoz, A. Z. & Kocasoy, G. (2008). Determination of the best appropriate management methods for the health-care wastes in Istanbul.Waste Management 28(7): 1227-1235.
  3. Alvim-Ferraz, M., & Afonso, S. (2003). Incineration of different types of medical wastes: Emission factors for particulate matter and heavy metals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37:3152–3157.
  4. Aydemir, I. (2017). Turkiye’de Cevre Bilinci Kapsaminda Tibbi Atik Uretim Surecleri ve Yonetimi. Bingol University Social Sciences Institute Journal: 7 (13): 295 – 311 Aydogan, O., Varank, G. and Bilgili, M. S. (2010). Medical waste management in Gaziantep. Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 3:132-140
  5. Birpinar, M. E., Bilgili, M. S. and Erdogan, T. (2009). Medical waste management in Turkey: A case study of Istanbul. Waste Management 29(1): 445-448.
  6. Ciplak, N. & Barton, J. R. (2012). A System Dynamics Approach for Healthcare Waste Management: A Case Study in Istanbul Metropolitan City, Turkey. International Solid Waste Association; Waste Management & Research 30(6): 576–586.
  7. Ciplak, N. (2015). Assessing future scenarios for healthcare waste management using a multi- criteria decision analysis tool: A case study in the Turkish West Black-Sea Region. The Journal of Air and Waste Management Association 65(8): 919-929
  8. Ciplak, N. & Kaskun, S. (2015). Healthcare waste management practice in the West Black Sea Region, Turkey: A comparative analysis with the developed and developing countries. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association 65(12):1387-9
  9. Couto N., Silva, V, Monteiro, E. and Rouboa, A. (2013). Hazardous Waste Management in Portugal: An Overview. Energy Procedia 36: 607-611
  10. Duan, H., Huang, Q., Wang, Q., Zhou, B. and Li, J. (2008). Hazardous waste generation and management in China A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials 158:221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.106. Fagnani, E. & Guimaraes, J. R. (2017). Waste management plan for higher education institutions in developing countries: The Continuous Improvement Cycle model. Journal of Cleaner Production 147: 108-118
  11. Fazzo, L.,