SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Academic Perspective on Social Studies / 2019 / Sayı: 1

DELAYING BEHAVIOR IN INSTITUTIONS: PROCRASTINATION

Seda Uyar(Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi)0000-0001-8051-8464
Pages
40–43
Publication Date
2019-04-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the correlated dimensions and the results from the point of institutions were discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Human-resource, whose importance cannot be denied for institutions, can contribute to the institution with the knowledge and skills they have.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Procrastination, interpreted as a coping mechanism (Burka and Yuen, 1983, p.60), is a complex fact that has behavioral, emotional, and cognitive features (Kovylin, 2013, p. 27).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the correlated dimensions and the results from the point of institutions were discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Procrastination · Delay · Workplace procrastination

Abstract

Human-resource, whose importance cannot be denied for institutions, can contribute to the institution with the knowledge and skills they have. On the other hand, they can punish the institution with different behaviors. Procrastination, interpreted as a coping mechanism (Burka and Yuen, 1983, p.60), is a complex fact that has behavioral, emotional, and cognitive features (Kovylin, 2013, p. 27). In this study, the procrastination term was defined and the factors that cause the procrastination behavior were explained. In addition, the correlated dimensions and the results from the point of institutions were discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uyar, S. (2019). DELAYING BEHAVIOR IN INSTITUTIONS: PROCRASTINATION. Journal of Academic Perspective on Social Studies, Sayı: 1, 40–43. https://doi.org/10.35344/japss.529729

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Ariely, D. ve Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment. Psychological Science, 13(3), 219-224.
  2. Blunt, A. K. ve Pychyl, T. A. (2000). Task aversiveness and procrastination: A multi-dimensional approach to task aversiveness across stages of personal projects. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(1), 153-167.
  3. Burka,J.B. ve Yuen, L.M. (1983). Procrastination: why you do ıt, what to do abaut ıt. New York Addison-Wessley.
  4. Çavuşoğlu, C. ve Karataş, H. (2015). Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Self-determination theory and academic motivation. Anthropologist, 20(3), 735-743.
  5. Ferrari, J. R. ve Diaz-Morales, J. F. (2007). Procrastination: Different time orientations reflect different motives. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 707-714.
  6. Ferrari, J. R. (1992). Procrastination in the Workplace: Attrıbutıons for Faılure Among Indıvıduals Wıth Sımılar Behavıoral Tendencıes. Person. individ. Diff., 13(3), 315-319.
  7. Ferrari, J. R. (1994). Dysfunctional Procrastinatıon and its Relatıonshıp Wıth Self-Esteem, Interpersonal Dependency, and Self-Defeatıng Behavıors. Person. individ. Diff., 17(5), 673-679.
  8. Gafni, R. ve Geri, N. (2010). Time management: Procrastination tendency in individual and collaborative tasks. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 5, 115-125.
  9. Garrett, K. R., ve Danziger, J. N. (2008a). On cyberslacking:Workplace status and personal internet use at work. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11, 287–292.
  10. Garrett, K. R., ve Danziger, J. N. (2008b). Disaffection or expected outcomes: Understanding personal internet use during work. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 937–958.
  11. Kandemir, M. ve Palancı, M. (2014). Academic functional procrastination: Validity and reliability study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 152, 194 – 198.
  12. Kovylin, V. S. (2013). Teoreticheskiye osnovy izucheniya fenomena prokrastinatsii. Lichnost’ v Menyayushchemsya Mire: Zdorov’ye, Adaptatsiya, Razvitiye, 2, 22-41.
  13. Metin, U. B., Taris, T. W., ve Peeters, M. C. V. (2016). Measuring procrastination at work and its associated workplace aspects, Personality and Individual Differences 101, 254–263.
  14. Milgram, N. A., Marshevsky, S. ve Sadeh, C. (1995). Correlates of academic procrastination: Discomfort, task aversiveness and task capability. Journal of Psychology, 129(2), 145- 15
  15. Milgram,N. ve Tenne, R. (2000). Personality correlates of decisional and task avoidant procrastination. European Journal of Personality 14: 141-156 Platonov, K. K. (2004). Kratkiy slovar’ sistemy psihologicheskih ponyatiy. Moskva: Visshaya Shkola.
  16. Rakes, G. C. ve Dunn, K. E. (2014). The influence of perfectionism on procrastination in online graduate education students. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & Teacher education international conference 2014 (pp. 799-803).
  17. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  18. Sadykova, G. (2016). İş Güvencesizliği İle İşyeri Prokrastinasyonu (Erteleme Alışkanlığı) İlişkisi. Int. Journal of Management Economics and Business, 12(30) 97-120., Solomon, L. J. & Rothblum, E. D. (1984). Academic procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 503-509.
  19. Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65-94.
  20. Wan, H. C., Downey, L. A. ve Stough, C. (2014). Understanding Non-Work Presenteeism: Relationships Between Emotional İntelligence, Boredom, Procrastination and Job Stress. Personality and Individual Differences. 65, 86–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.018.