Journals / International Journal of Public Finance / 2019 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of the Expansionary Fiscal Policies on economic growth in OECD Countries Abstract

OECD Ülkelerinde Genişletici Maliye Politikalarının Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Etkisi

Pages
59–74
Publication Date
2019-07-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results; the expansionary effect of fiscal policies has no effect on economic growth between the period of 2011 – 2017.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although monetary and fiscal policies are discussed in different economic approaches, the main discussion is focused on fiscal policy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we analyze the relationship between economic growth and fiscal impulse which is used to measure changes in public budget impacts by using the panel data analysis with fixed effects in 33 OECD countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results; the expansionary effect of fiscal policies has no effect on economic growth between the period of 2011 – 2017.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 – 2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Mali etki · Keynesyen iktisat · Maliye Politikası

Abstract

Although monetary and fiscal policies are discussed in different economic approaches, the main discussion is focused on fiscal policy. Because while the central bank leads the monetary policy independently with its own policy goals and tools, the government leads the fiscal policy via budget as a basic tool of the economic policy. In this study, we analyze the relationship between economic growth and fiscal impulse which is used to measure changes in public budget impacts by using the panel data analysis with fixed effects in 33 OECD countries. We use the International Monetary Fund and World Bank data. According to the results; the expansionary effect of fiscal policies has no effect on economic growth between the period of 2011 – 2017.

Özet

Para ve maliye politikaları farklı ekonomik yaklaşımlar içinde ele alınan politikalar olmasına rağmen, yaklaşımlar arasındaki temel tartışma maliye politikası üzerindedir. Bunun nedeni, para politikasına amaç ve araç bağımsızlığı çerçevesinde merkez bankası yön verirken; hükümetin bütçe aracılığı ile maliye politikasını temel iktisat politikası aracı olarak kullanmasıdır. Bu çalışmada, kamu bütçesindeki meydana gelen değişmeleri ölçmek içinde kullanılan mali etki ile ekonomik büyüme arasında ilişki 33 OECD için panel veri analizi sabit etkiler modeli kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada Uluslararası Para Fonu ve Dünya Bankası verileri kullanılmıştır. 2011 – 2017 yılları arasını kapsayan analiz sonuçlarına göre; maliye politikalarının genişletici etkisinin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisinin olmadığı görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEYNELİ, F., ÇOBAN, H. (2019). The Effect of the Expansionary Fiscal Policies on economic growth in OECD Countries Abstract. International Journal of Public Finance, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 59–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/768362

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Afonso, A. & Claeys, P. (2008). The Dynamic Behaviour of Budget Components and Output. Economic Modelling, 25, 93-117.
  2. Ay, H. & Uçar, Ö. (2015) Üç Küresel Ekonomik Krizin Analizi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 17(1). 11-32.Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (4th ed.). Chichester, UK; John Wiley & Sons. Barro, R. J. (1995). Inflation and Economic Growth (NBER Working Paper No. 5326). Barro, R. J. (1996). Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study (NBER Working Paper No. 5698). Cambridge, MA. Bassanini, A., Scarpetta, S., & Hemmings, P. (2001). Economic Growth: The Role of Policies and Institutions. Panel Data Evidence from OECD Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.265091.
  3. Brown, E. Cary. (1949). Some Evidence on Business Expectations. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 31(3). 236-238.
  4. Brown, E. Cary. (1956). Fiscal Policy in the 'Thirties: A Reappraisal. The American Economic Review. 46(5). 857-879.
  5. Buluş, A.& Kabaklarlı, E. (2010). 1929 Ekonomik Buhran İle Son Dönem Global Krizin Karşılaştırılması. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi. 10(19). 1 – 22. Burda, M., & Wyplosz, C. (2001). Macroeconomics (Third Edit). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  6. Caldentey, Esteban P. (2003).
  7. Chicago, Keynes and Fiscal Policy. Investigación Económica. 62(246) 15-45. Câmara, A. F. N. & and Vernengo, M. (2004) Fiscal Policy and the Washington Consensus: A Post Keynesian Perspective. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 27(2). 333- 343. Chand, S.K. (1977). Summary Measures of Fiscal Influence. IMF Staff Papers. 24(2). ss. 405-449
  8. Chand, S.K. (1977). Summary Measures of Fiscal Influence. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers. XXIV(2). 405-449.
  9. Chand, S.K. (1992) Fiscal Impulses and Their Fiscal Impact. International Monetary Fund Working Paper. 92/38. Charbit, Yves. (2002). The Political Failure of an Economic Theory: Physiocracy. Population-E. 57(6). 855-884.
  10. Cole, H. L. & Ohanian Lee E. (1999). The Great Depression in the United States From a Neoclassical Perspective. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review. 23(1). Crafts, N. & and Fearon, P. (2010) Lessons from the 1930s Great Depression. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 26(3). 285-317
  11. Dökmen, G. & Vural, T. (2011). Maliye Politikalarının Keynesyen Olmayan Etkileri: Türkiye Örneği. Maliye Dergisi. 161. 118-132.
  12. Eecke, W. Ver.(2003) Adam Smith and Musgrave’s Concept of Merit Good. Journal of Socio-Economics. 31(6). 701–720