Journals / International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Special Education Candidate Teachers’ Metaphors about Social Media

Pages
185–194
Publication Date
2020-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The forms were filled by 87 participants and the results show that they have developed 81 different metaphors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Because technology is developing each day and internet is getting easier to access, the types of communication among the people also have a constant alteration.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Studies in this context suggest that students do not use social media only to communicate with each other but also to exchange information, cooperate and share their class materials.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The forms were filled by 87 participants and the results show that they have developed 81 different metaphors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Social media · metaphor · special education

Abstract

Because technology is developing each day and internet is getting easier to access, the types of communication among the people also have a constant alteration. Social media being one of the leads, especially the students undergoing an education frequently use these new communication styles. Studies in this context suggest that students do not use social media only to communicate with each other but also to exchange information, cooperate and share their class materials. In this regard, the perspectives of those who will be teaching students with special needs regarding social media are important to focus on. Therefore, this inquiry aims to identify the approaches of special education candidate teachers about social media courses through metaphors. The phenomenological research design was applied in this study. Participants were chosen from the candidate teachers who studied Special Education Teaching at Sakarya University Education Faculty in 2017 and 2018. The data was collected through the forms which had expressions as “because it is … social media is like … “and content analysis was used to examine this data. The forms were filled by 87 participants and the results show that they have developed 81 different metaphors. Based on the reasons for these metaphors researchers formed 6 categories: life colour, side effect, object, dependency, necessity and waste of time. It was also observed that the perspectives of special education candidate teachers about social media courses were typically positive.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAĞCI, H., BAĞCI, Ö. A. (2020). Special Education Candidate Teachers’ Metaphors about Social Media. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 185–194. https://ajindex.com/articles/768236

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Ajjan, H. & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71−80. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002. Aktekin, S. (2010). Hayat boyu öğrenme ve sürekli mesleki gelişim. (Ed. M.Safran), Tarih Nasıl Öğretilir? Tarih Öğretmenleri İçin Özel Öğretim Yöntemleri (377-384), İstanbul:
  2. Yeni İnsan Yayınevi.
  3. Aküzüm, C. & Saraçoğlu, M. (2017). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal medyaya ilişkin tutumlarının incelenmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 803-817. doi: 10.14582/DUZGEF.789. Alav, O. (2014). Sosyal medya’nın birey ve toplumsal yapıya etkileri. Elektronik Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(1), 1-22.
  4. Aslan-Bağcı, Ö. & Bağcı, H. (2016). Çocuk gelişimi programı öğrencilerinin sosyal medya kullanım amaçları ve sosyal medya hakkındaki görüşleri. International Academic Research Congress. 3-5 November 2016. Antalya- Side. 1186-1191.
  5. Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & De Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in human behavior, 26(2), 247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003. Council for Exceptional Children (CEC, 2014). CEC Professional Standards. https://www.cec.sped.org/Standards.
  6. Gül, Ş. & Diken, E. H. (2018). Fen bilgisi öğretmeni adaylarının sosyal medya bağımlılıklarının incelenmesi. Kafkas Üniversitesi, e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 41-50. doi: 10.30900/kafkasegt.386531. Güven, B. & Güven S., (2009). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin sosyal bilgiler dersinde metafor oluşturma becerilerine ilişkin nicel bir araştırma. Kastamonu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 503-512.
  7. Horzum, M. B. (2016). Examining the relationship to gender and personality on the purpose of Facebook usage of Turkish university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.010 Jensen, F.N. (2006). Metaphors as a bridge to understanding educational and social contexts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1-17. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500104. Jones, N., Blackey, H., Fitzgibbon, K., & Chew, E. (2010). Get out of MySpace. Computers&Education, 54, 776- 782. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.008. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 Karaboğa, M. T. (2018). Üniversite öğrencilerinin bir sosyalleşme