SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Analysis And Improvement Of Prospective Teachers’ Educational Facebook Use and Development A Model For Educational Purposes

Onur İŞBULAN
Mübin KIYICI
Pages
50–71
Publication Date
2020-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the end of the study, Acceptance of Facebook Use for Educational Purposes Model was created based on Technology Acceptance Model 2, and through the educational purpose Facebook activity, a significant increase was achieved in prospective teachers’ level of acceptance to Facebook use for educational purposes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Within the scope of this research, prospective teachers’ opinions on Facebook use for educational purposes was examined, and a modeling study was conducted in accordance with these views.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study in which mixed method research patterns were used as research model, opinions were taken from 462 prospective teachers with a view to develop Acceptance of Facebook Use for Educational Purposes Scale and Acceptance of Facebook Use for Educational Purposes Model; scale development and model development studies were completed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end of the study, Acceptance of Facebook Use for Educational Purposes Model was created based on Technology Acceptance Model 2, and through the educational purpose Facebook activity, a significant increase was achieved in prospective teachers’ level of acceptance to Facebook use for educational purposes.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Social Network · Technology Acceptance Model · Facebook

Abstract

Within the scope of this research, prospective teachers’ opinions on Facebook use for educational purposes was examined, and a modeling study was conducted in accordance with these views. In this study in which mixed method research patterns were used as research model, opinions were taken from 462 prospective teachers with a view to develop Acceptance of Facebook Use for Educational Purposes Scale and Acceptance of Facebook Use for Educational Purposes Model; scale development and model development studies were completed. With Facebook Use for Educational Purposes Activity in accordance with the developed model, level of acceptance of Facebook use for educational purposes among prospective teachers was analyzed. Pilot application of Facebook use for educational purposes activities was carried out with 76 students, and its application was carried out with 67 students; at the end of application, interviews were made with 17 students through semi-structured interview form. At the end of the study, Acceptance of Facebook Use for Educational Purposes Model was created based on Technology Acceptance Model 2, and through the educational purpose Facebook activity, a significant increase was achieved in prospective teachers’ level of acceptance to Facebook use for educational purposes.

🔖

Cite This Article

İŞBULAN, O., KIYICI, M. (2020). Analysis And Improvement Of Prospective Teachers’ Educational Facebook Use and Development A Model For Educational Purposes. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 50–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/768224

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1289-1295. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018 Bailey, D. (1987). Methods of Social Research. New York: The Free Press.
  2. Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History and Scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
  3. Bryman, A., and Cramer, D. (1999). Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS Release 8 for Windows. Taylor and Francis e-Library, Routledge. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö., Demirel, F., & Özkahveci, Ö. (2004). Güdülenme ve Öğrenme Stratejileri Ölçeği’nin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, (2), 207-239.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara:
  5. Pegem Yayınları.
  6. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programmings. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocatiates, Publishers.
  7. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides, Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 236-295). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Creswell, J. (2013).
  8. Research Design, Fourth Edition.
  9. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. CA SAGE Publications, Inc. Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. CA:Sage: Thousands Oaks. Davis, F. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Unpublished dissertation thesis). Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975).
  10. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  11. Franklin, T., & van Harmelen, M. (2007). Web 2.0 for Content for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Franklin Consulting. Guion, L., Diehl, D., & McDonald, D. (2011). Triangulation: Establishing the Validity of Qualitative Studies. Youth and Community Sciences. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: Structur